Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1996 Sep 1;134(5):1109–1125. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.5.1109

Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing

PMCID: PMC2120985  PMID: 8794855

Abstract

The preconditions and early steps of meiotic chromosome pairing were studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome- specific DNA probes to mouse and human testis tissue sections. Premeiotic pairing of homologous chromosomes was not detected in spermatogonia of the two species. FISH with centromere- and telomere- specific DNA probes in combination with immunostaining (IS) of synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins to testis sections of prepuberal mice at days 4-12 post partum was performed to study sequentially the meiotic pairing process. Movements of centromeres and then telomeres to the nuclear envelope, and of telomeres along the nuclear envelope leading to the formation of a chromosomal bouquet were detected during mouse prophase. At the bouquet stage, pairing of a mouse chromosome-8- specific probe was observed. SC-IS and simultaneous telomere FISH revealed that axial element proteins appear as large aggregates in mouse meiocytes when telomeres are attached to the nuclear envelope. Axial element formation initiates during tight telomere clustering and transverse filament-IS indicated the initiation of synapsis during this stage. Comparison of telomere and centromere distribution patterns of mouse and human meiocytes revealed movements of centromeres and then telomeres to the nuclear envelope and subsequent bouquet formation as conserved motifs of the pairing process. Chromosome painting in human spermatogonia revealed compacted, largely mutually exclusive chromosome territories. The territories developed into long, thin threads at the onset of meiotic prophase. Based on these results a unified model of the pairing process is proposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong S. J., Kirkham A. J., Hultén M. A. XY chromosome behaviour in the germ-line of the human male: a FISH analysis of spatial orientation, chromatin condensation and pairing. Chromosome Res. 1994 Nov;2(6):445–452. doi: 10.1007/BF01552867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashley T. Mammalian meiotic recombination: a reexamination. Hum Genet. 1994 Dec;94(6):587–593. doi: 10.1007/BF00206950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellvé A. R., Cavicchia J. C., Millette C. F., O'Brien D. A., Bhatnagar Y. M., Dym M. Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):68–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellvé A. R., Millette C. F., Bhatnagar Y. M., O'Brien D. A. Dissociation of the mouse testis and characterization of isolated spermatogenic cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1977 Jul;25(7):480–494. doi: 10.1177/25.7.893996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackburn E. H. Telomeres: no end in sight. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):621–623. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyle A. L., Ward D. C. Isolation and initial characterization of a large repeat sequence element specific to mouse chromosome 8. Genomics. 1992 Mar;12(3):517–525. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90443-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinkley B. R., Brenner S. L., Hall J. M., Tousson A., Balczon R. D., Valdivia M. M. Arrangements of kinetochores in mouse cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis. Chromosoma. 1986;94(4):309–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00290861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng Y. E., Gartler S. M. A fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of X chromosome pairing in early human female meiosis. Hum Genet. 1994 Oct;94(4):389–394. doi: 10.1007/BF00201599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cherry L. M., Hsu T. C. Antitubulin immunofluorescence studies of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Chromosoma. 1984;90(4):265–274. doi: 10.1007/BF00287034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chikashige Y., Ding D. Q., Funabiki H., Haraguchi T., Mashiko S., Yanagida M., Hiraoka Y. Telomere-led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. Science. 1994 Apr 8;264(5156):270–273. doi: 10.1126/science.8146661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins C., Kuo W. L., Segraves R., Fuscoe J., Pinkel D., Gray J. W. Construction and characterization of plasmid libraries enriched in sequences from single human chromosomes. Genomics. 1991 Dec;11(4):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90025-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooke H. J., Hindley J. Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jul 25;6(10):3177–3197. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.10.3177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dawe R. K., Sedat J. W., Agard D. A., Cande W. Z. Meiotic chromosome pairing in maize is associated with a novel chromatin organization. Cell. 1994 Mar 11;76(5):901–912. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90364-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Rooij D. G. Regulation of the proliferation of spermatogonial stem cells. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1988;10:181–194. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1988.supplement_10.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dietrich A. J., Kok E., Offenberg H. H., Heyting C., de Boer P., Vink A. C. The sequential appearance of components of the synaptonemal complex during meiosis of the female rat. Genome. 1992 Jun;35(3):492–497. doi: 10.1139/g92-072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dym M., Fawcett D. W. Further observations on the numbers of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids connected by intercellular bridges in the mammalian testis. Biol Reprod. 1971 Apr;4(2):195–215. doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/4.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferguson M., Ward D. C. Cell cycle dependent chromosomal movement in pre-mitotic human T-lymphocyte nuclei. Chromosoma. 1992 Aug;101(9):557–565. doi: 10.1007/BF00660315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilson E., Laroche T., Gasser S. M. Telomeres and the functional architecture of the nucleus. Trends Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;3(4):128–134. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90175-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goetz P., Chandley A. C., Speed R. M. Morphological and temporal sequence of meiotic prophase development at puberty in the male mouse. J Cell Sci. 1984 Jan;65:249–263. doi: 10.1242/jcs.65.1.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guacci V., Hogan E., Koshland D. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(3):517–530. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haaf T., Steinlein C., Schmid M. Nucleolar transcriptional activity in mouse Sertoli cells is dependent on centromere arrangement. Exp Cell Res. 1990 Nov;191(1):157–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(90)90051-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haaf T., Ward D. C. Rabl orientation of CENP-B box sequences in Tupaia belangeri fibroblasts. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995;70(3-4):258–262. doi: 10.1159/000134047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hawley R. S., Arbel T. Yeast genetics and the fall of the classical view of meiosis. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):301–303. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90108-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Heng H. H., Chamberlain J. W., Shi X. M., Spyropoulos B., Tsui L. C., Moens P. B. Regulation of meiotic chromatin loop size by chromosomal position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):2795–2800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heyting C., Dettmers R. J., Dietrich A. J., Redeker E. J., Vink A. C. Two major components of synaptonemal complexes are specific for meiotic prophase nuclei. Chromosoma. 1988;96(4):325–332. doi: 10.1007/BF00286921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiraoka Y., Dernburg A. F., Parmelee S. J., Rykowski M. C., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W. The onset of homologous chromosome pairing during Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(3):591–600. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hopman A. H., van Hooren E., van de Kaa C. A., Vooijs P. G., Ramaekers F. C. Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations using in situ hybridization in paraffin sections of routinely processed bladder cancers. Mod Pathol. 1991 Jul;4(4):503–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hsu T. C., Cooper J. E., Mace M. L., Jr, Brinkley B. R. Arrangement of centromeres in mouse cells. Chromosoma. 1971;34(1):73–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00285517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hulspas R., Houtsmuller A. B., Krijtenburg P. J., Bauman J. G., Nanninga N. The nuclear position of pericentromeric DNA of chromosome 11 appears to be random in G0 and non-random in G1 human lymphocytes. Chromosoma. 1994 Jul;103(4):286–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00352253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Johannisson R., Winking H. Synaptonemal complexes of chains and rings in mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian translocations. Chromosome Res. 1994 Mar;2(2):137–145. doi: 10.1007/BF01553492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kleckner N., Weiner B. M. Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic, and premeiotic cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993;58:553–565. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1993.058.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kluin P. M., de Rooij D. G. A comparison between the morphology and cell kinetics of gonocytes and adult type undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse. Int J Androl. 1981 Aug;4(4):475–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1981.tb00732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kohli J. Meiosis. Telomeres lead chromosome movement. Curr Biol. 1994 Aug 1;4(8):724–727. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00160-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lammers J. H., Offenberg H. H., van Aalderen M., Vink A. C., Dietrich A. J., Heyting C. The gene encoding a major component of the lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes of the rat is related to X-linked lymphocyte-regulated genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1137–1146. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Loidl J., Klein F., Scherthan H. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(6):1191–1200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Loidl J., Nairz K., Klein F. Meiotic chromosome synapsis in a haploid yeast. Chromosoma. 1991 May;100(4):221–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00344155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Loidl J., Scherthan H., Kaback D. B. Physical association between nonhomologous chromosomes precedes distributive disjunction in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):331–334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Loidl J. The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view. Genome. 1990 Dec;33(6):759–778. doi: 10.1139/g90-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Maguire M. P. Is the synaptonemal complex a disjunction machine? J Hered. 1995 Sep-Oct;86(5):330–340. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Maguire M. P., Riess R. W. The relationship of homologous synapsis and crossing over in a maize inversion. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):281–288. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Meuwissen R. L., Offenberg H. H., Dietrich A. J., Riesewijk A., van Iersel M., Heyting C. A coiled-coil related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):5091–5100. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05616.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mitchell A. R., Gosden J. R., Miller D. A. A cloned sequence, p82H, of the alphoid repeated DNA family found at the centromeres of all human chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1985;92(5):369–377. doi: 10.1007/BF00327469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miyazaki W. Y., Orr-Weaver T. L. Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:167–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.001123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moens P. B., Heyting C., Dietrich A. J., van Raamsdonk W., Chen Q. Synaptonemal complex antigen location and conservation. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):93–103. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moens P. B. Molecular perspectives of chromosome pairing at meiosis. Bioessays. 1994 Feb;16(2):101–106. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moens P. B., Pearlman R. E. Telomere and centromere DNA are associated with the cores of meiotic prophase chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1990 Dec;100(1):8–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00337598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moens P. B. Quantitative electron microscopy of chromosome organization at meiotic prophase. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:99–107. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Moses M. J., Dresser M. E., Poorman P. A. Composition and role of the synaptonemal complex. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38:245–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Moyzis R. K., Buckingham J. M., Cram L. S., Dani M., Deaven L. L., Jones M. D., Meyne J., Ratliff R. L., Wu J. R. A highly conserved repetitive DNA sequence, (TTAGGG)n, present at the telomeres of human chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(18):6622–6626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. OAKBERG E. F. A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am J Anat. 1956 Nov;99(3):391–413. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000990303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Offenberg H. H., Dietrich A. J., Heyting C. Tissue distribution of two major components of synaptonemal complexes of the rat. Chromosoma. 1991 Nov;101(2):83–91. doi: 10.1007/BF00357057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Oud J. L., Reutlinger A. H. Chromosome behaviour during early meiotic prophase of mouse primary spermatocytes. Chromosoma. 1981;83(3):395–407. doi: 10.1007/BF00327361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pardue M. L., Gall J. G. Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science. 1970 Jun 12;168(3937):1356–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3937.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Parvinen M., Söderström K. O. Chromosome rotation and formation of synapsis. Nature. 1976 Apr 8;260(5551):534–535. doi: 10.1038/260534a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ragg S., Härle M., Scherthan H. Analysis of sex chromosome distribution in the gonadal tissue of a 45,X/47,XYY mosaic by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 1995 Apr;8(3):295–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. Mechanics of meiosis. Hereditas. 1980;93(2):187–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1980.tb01360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rickards G. K. Prophase chromosome movements in living house cricket spermatocytes and their relationship to prometaphase, anaphase and granule movements. Chromosoma. 1975;49(4):407–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00285133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Roeder G. S. Chromosome synapsis and genetic recombination: their roles in meiotic chromosome segregation. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):385–389. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90297-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Salonen K., Paranko J., Parvinen M. A colcemid-sensitive mechanism involved in regulation of chromosome movements during meiotic pairing. Chromosoma. 1982;85(5):611–618. doi: 10.1007/BF00330775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Scherthan H., Bähler J., Kohli J. Dynamics of chromosome organization and pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;127(2):273–285. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Scherthan H., Loidl J., Schuster T., Schweizer D. Meiotic chromosome condensation and pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae studied by chromosome painting. Chromosoma. 1992 Oct;101(10):590–595. doi: 10.1007/BF00360535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmekel K., Daneholt B. The central region of the synaptonemal complex revealed in three dimensions. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;5(6):239–242. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Selig S., Okumura K., Ward D. C., Cedar H. Delineation of DNA replication time zones by fluorescence in situ hybridization. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):1217–1225. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05162.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Speed R. M. Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. I. An analysis at the light microscope level using surface-spreading. Chromosoma. 1982;85(3):427–437. doi: 10.1007/BF00330366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Svoboda A., Bähler J., Kohli J. Microtubule-driven nuclear movements and linear elements as meiosis-specific characteristics of the fission yeasts Schizosaccharomyces versatilis and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Chromosoma. 1995 Nov;104(3):203–214. doi: 10.1007/BF00352185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Therman E., Sarto G. E. Premeiotic and early meiotic stages in the pollen mother cells of Eremurus and in human embryonic oocytes. Hum Genet. 1977 Feb 11;35(2):137–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00393963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vergouwen R. P., Jacobs S. G., Huiskamp R., Davids J. A., de Rooij D. G. Proliferative activity of gonocytes, Sertoli cells and interstitial cells during testicular development in mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1991 Sep;93(1):233–243. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0930233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vourc'h C., Taruscio D., Boyle A. L., Ward D. C. Cell cycle-dependent distribution of telomeres, centromeres, and chromosome-specific subsatellite domains in the interphase nucleus of mouse lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1993 Mar;205(1):142–151. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wandall A., Svendsen A. Transition from somatic to meiotic pairing and progressional changes of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of Aedes aegypti. Chromosoma. 1985;92(4):254–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00329808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Weimer R., Haaf T., Krüger J., Poot M., Schmid M. Characterization of centromere arrangements and test for random distribution in G0, G1, S, G2, G1, and early S' phase in human lymphocytes. Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;88(6):673–682. doi: 10.1007/BF02265296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Weiner B. M., Kleckner N. Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):977–991. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zickler D. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the "recombination nodules" during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma. 1977 Jun 23;61(4):289–316. doi: 10.1007/BF00288615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. de Lange T. Human telomeres are attached to the nuclear matrix. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):717–724. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05104.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. von Wettstein D., Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:331–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES