Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2015 Apr 22;1:15002. doi: 10.1038/npjparkd.2015.2

Common Genetic Variant Association with Altered HLA Expression, Synergy with Pyrethroid Exposure, and Risk for Parkinson’s Disease: An Observational and Case–Control Study

G T Kannarkat 1, D A Cook 1, J-K Lee 1, J Chang 1, J Chung 1, E Sandy 1, K C Paul 2, B Ritz 2, J Bronstein 3, S A Factor 4, J M Boss 5,*, M G Tansey 1,*
PMCID: PMC4853162  NIHMSID: NIHMS758414  PMID: 27148593

Abstract

Background/Objectives

The common non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3129882 in HLA-DRA is associated with risk for idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD). The location of the SNP in the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) locus implicates regulation of antigen presentation as a potential mechanism by which immune responses link genetic susceptibility to environmental factors in conferring lifetime risk for PD.

Methods

For immunophenotyping, blood cells from 81 subjects were analyzed by qRT-PCR and flow cytometry. A case-control study was performed on a separate cohort of 962 subjects to determine association of pesticide exposure and the SNP with risk of PD.

Results

Homozygosity for G at this SNP was associated with heightened baseline expression and inducibility of MHC class II molecules in B cells and monocytes from peripheral blood of healthy controls and PD patients. In addition, exposure to a commonly used class of insecticide, pyrethroids, synergized with the risk conferred by this SNP (OR = 2.48, p = 0.007), thereby identifying a novel gene-environment interaction that promotes risk for PD via alterations in immune responses.

Conclusions

In sum, these novel findings suggest that the MHC-II locus may increase susceptibility to PD through presentation of pathogenic, immunodominant antigens and/or a shift toward a more pro-inflammatory CD4+ T cell response in response to specific environmental exposures, such as pyrethroid exposure through genetic or epigenetic mechanisms that modulate MHC-II gene expression.

Introduction

The etiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains largely unknown with less than 10% of cases attributable to an identifiable causative genetic mutation1. The clinical diagnosis of PD by its hallmark motor symptoms may be preceded by various non-motor symptoms, including depression, anosmia, constipation, and REM-sleep behavior abnormalities some of which have been postulated to be fueled by inflammatory processes2,3

Genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding glucocerebrosidase, α-synuclein, tau, and others have been reported to modify PD risk1. Environmental exposures, such as pesticide exposure and head trauma are associated with increased risk for developing PD4,5. Like other age-related diseases, current hypotheses suggest that genetic susceptibility must synergize with lifetime environmental exposures to initiate the development of PD pathology6,7. The major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) that is responsible for antigen presentation to the adaptive immune system may be particularly important in linking genetic background to environmental exposures8. Inflammation has been implicated as a key driver of PD pathogenesis9. Post-mortem examination of PD brains has revealed microglial activation and lymphocyte infiltration in areas of degeneration10,11. Increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, altered composition of peripheral immune cells, and the protective effects of chronic ibuprofen consumption further implicate inflammation in PD pathogenesis10,12,13.

The MHC-II locus contains the most highly polymorphic genes in the human population and mediates antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells and induction of adaptive immunity8,26. MHC-II molecules present antigenic peptides on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as B cells, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and microglia8,26. The MHC-II locus encodes three different α/β heterodimeric isotypes (HLA-DR, -DQ, and -DP)8. Each isotype has the potential to present distinct antigenic subsets to CD4+ T cells and induce their differentiation in a specified manner8. Differentiated CD4+ T cells (Th1, Th2, Th17, etc.) promote specific inflammatory effector responses or as regulatory T cells (Tregs), suppress inflammation26. Given its key role in adaptive immunity, the MHC-II locus is an ideal candidate for linking the environment and genetic susceptibility to PD pathogenesis through inflammation.

Supporting a disease-promoting role for antigen presentation, multiple studies have identified associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MHC-II region and risk for late-onset PD1423. In several genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the rs3192882 SNP has been associated with altered risk for PD14,15,24,25; yet ethnic background appears to influence the allele associated with increased risk. In the largest GWAS to look at this SNP, homozygous carriers of the high-risk G allele (21% of PD patients and 16% of CTRLs) were found to have a 1.7 fold increased relative risk of developing PD in people of European ancestry14. Additionally, the G allele carried by 46% of PD patients and 40% of CTRLs was associated with increased levels of MHC-II as an expression-quantitative trait locus (eQTL) in subjects of European ancestry18 and more strongly associated with risk for sporadic PD rather than familial PD17. As an eQTL, this SNP could be associated with genetic or epigenetic regulatory elements that modify the expression of the MHC-II locus. These data led us to hypothesize that the rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with increased surface and mRNA expression and greater inducibility of the MHC-II locus in peripheral immune cells relative to the AA genotype.

Given that the rs3129882 SNP is located in the first intron of the monomorphic HLA-DRA gene and has not been associated with particular MHC-II haplotypes,18 it was somewhat surprising that a common genetic variant in an immune locus could influence the risk for a complex neurologic disorder. Clearly, the genetic association between the MHC-II locus and risk for PD is complex and may depend on a variety of factors such as ethnic background, environmental exposures, etc. As such, we hypothesized that this SNP would synergize with pesticide exposure, a known PD-relevant risk factor, to increase risk for PD and this risk might be further modifiable by ethnicity and race. Given the heterogeneity of findings in various GWAS for MHC-II and risk for PD, the rs3129882 SNP warranted further exploration as a possible genetic marker in certain populations associated with complex genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms that modulate risk for PD by affecting antigen presentation.

Results

MHC-II Expression Study Population

To assess the effect of rs3129882 on MHC-II expression, 81 homozygous non-PD control (CTRL) and PD subjects were recruited into four groups: CTRL AA (n=25), CTRL GG (n=12), PD AA (n=15), and PD GG (n=29). This strategy allowed us to examine the effect of SNP genotype, as well as disease status, on MHC-II expression. The groups of this study population were balanced with respect to factors that modify PD risk2729, including age, smoking, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, caffeine intake, mean Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score, levodopa equivalence dose, and duration of disease for the PD groups (Table S1).

The rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with increased surface MHC-II expression

Given that the rs3129882 G SNP was associated with increased levels of MHC-II eQTL in subjects of European ancestry18, we tested the hypothesis that in people of European ancestry, homozygosity for the G SNP would be associated with higher MHC-II expression compared to homozygosity for the A SNP. Flow cytometry was used to measure the frequency of cells expressing both HLA-DR and –DQ (DR/DQ double-positive cells) on the cell surface of APCs. We focused our analyses on B cells and monocytes because they are the major APCs in the peripheral blood. Nearly all peripheral B cells and monocytes were HLA-DR positive (Fig S1). In our cohort, 80% of peripheral blood B cells were HLA-DR/DQ double-positive in all four groups of subjects (Fig 1A). Similarly, nearly all monocytes were HLA-DR positive but only 20–30% of peripheral blood monocytes were HLA-DR/DQ double-positive in all four groups of subjects (Fig 1A). Using flow cytometry, the average level of HLA-DR or HLA-DQ surface expression was also measured, reported as median fluorescence intensity (MFI). In both B cells and monocytes from the CTRL GG group, there was a significant two-fold increase in the MFI of HLA-DR compared to the CTRL AA group (Fig 1B). The MFI of HLA-DQ on B cells from GG individuals was also significantly increased in both CTRL and PD patients by 1.5- to 2-fold (Fig 1C). In this cohort, having the GG genotype was associated with increased MFI of HLA-DR on both B cells and monocytes and of HLA-DQ on B cells.

Fig 1. The high-risk rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with an increased level of MHC-II expression in B cells and monocytes and with increased inducibility of surface HLA-DQ expression.

Fig 1

A) Frequency of HLA-DR/DQ double-positive, B) average level of HLA-DR expression, C) average level of HLA-DQ expression in B cells and monocytes was determined by flow cytometry staining of total PBMCs. One-tailed student’s T-test between high risk and low risk allele groups was used to test for significance. * p <0.05. HLA-DR MFI: CTRL AA vs CTRL GG B cells t(33) = 2.28 p < 0.05; Monocytes t(34) = 2.14 p < 0.05. HLA-DQ MFI CTRL AA vs CTRL GG B cells t(28) =1.76, p < 0.05; PD AA vs PD GG t(35) = 1.82, p < 0.05. Surface MHC-II expression in paramagnetically, positively-sorted monocytes stimulated with various concentrations of IFN-γ was measured by flow cytometry staining to measure increase in D) frequency of HLA-DR/DQ double-positive cells, E) level of HLA-DR expression, and F) level of HLA-DQ expression. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test for significance between GG and AA groups. *** p < 0.001. 2A) PD GG vs PD AA F(1,190) = 11.97 p < 0.001. 1F) CTRL GG vs CTRL AA F(1, 163) = 10.39 p < 0.001. Inset for DQ MFI (1F) panel shows sorted monocytes from PD patients stimulated with 1000 U/mL IFN-γ. One-tailed T-test was performed for significance. t(31) = 1.52; p = 0.05.

The rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with increased IFN-γ inducibility of HLA-DQ expression

Given that MHC-II expression increases upon cellular activation8,30, we also measured disease- and genotype-specific effects on induction of this locus using IFN-γ, a potent stimulator of MHC-II gene expression30,31. In response to IFN-γ, the frequency of monocytes that became HLA-DR/DQ double-positive cells was significantly higher in the PD GG group relative to the PD AA group (Fig 1D). The level of induction of HLA-DR surface expression on monocytes was the same in all four groups of subjects (Fig 1E). In contrast, the HLA-DQ surface expression was significantly increased on IFN-γ stimulated monocytes from CTRL GG individuals compared to CTRL AA individuals (Fig 1F). In PD GG patients, HLA-DQ surface expression was significantly increased relative to PD AA patients at the highest dose of IFN-γ (Fig 1F inset). In summary, the rs3129882 GG genotype was associated with increased HLA-DQ expression on monocytes in response to IFN-γ.

The rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with increased baseline expression and IFN-γ inducibility of MHC-II mRNA

Next, we interrogated transcriptional levels of MHC-II to determine possible mechanisms underlying the association of rs3129882 with altered surface MHC-II expression. To assess the extent to which APCs from AA versus GG individuals expressed differences in mRNA levels of the various MHC-II isotypes, we performed quantitative RT-PCR for the four MHC-II genes in closest proximity to rs3129882: HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-DQB1 that are common among all MHC-II haplotypes. In B cells from CTRL subjects, the high-risk genotype was significantly associated with increased mRNA levels of HLA-DRA, -DRB1, and -DQB1 (Fig 2A). In monocytes, the GG genotype was associated with increased HLA-DQB1 mRNA expression in both PD patients and CTRLs and with increased HLA-DRB1 mRNA expression in PD subjects (Fig 2B). In addition to these statistically significant 10- to 20-fold increases in mRNA expression, there were clear upward trends in expression of HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 mRNA in B cells from PD GG patients and HLA-DRB1 mRNA expression in monocytes from CTRL GG subjects.

Fig 2. The high-risk rs3129882 GG genotype is associated with increased baseline expression and inducibility of MHC-II mRNA.

Fig 2

RNA was isolated from paramagnetically, positively sorted A) B cells and B) monocytes. MHC-II mRNA expression was quantified relative to 18s rRNA with RT-PCR.* p < 0.05, ** p <0.01, **** p < 0.0001. B cell CTRL GG vs CTRL AA HLA-DRA t(35) = 2.01 p < 0.05; HLA-DRB1 t(34) =2.04 p < 0.05; HLA-DQB1 t(33) = 3.28 p < 0.01. B cell PD GG vs PD AA HLA-DRB1 t(25) = 1.59 p = 0.06; HLA-DQB1 t(33) = 1.64 p = 0.06. Monocytes CTRL GG vs CTRL AA HLA-DRB1 t(32) =1.90 p < 0.05; HLA-DQB1 t(35) = 2.08 p < 0.01; PD GG vs PD AA HLA-DRB1 t(26) = 2.24 p < 0.05; HLA-DQB1 t(30) = 2.28 p < 0.05 C) Fold change in MHC-II expression with or without 100 U/mL IFN-γ stimulation in paramagnetically, positively sorted monocytes was measured by RT-PCR after normalization to 18s rRNA levels. One-tailed T-test was performed as indicated. **** p < 0.0001 ** p <0.01, * p < 0.05. CTRL AA vs GG HLA-DRA t(33) = 1.77 p < 0.05; HLA-DQA1 t(13) = 1.80 p < 0.05; PD AA vs PD GG HLA-DRA t(36) = 1.76 p < 0.01; HLA-DRB1 t(29) = 1.65 p < 0.01; HLA-DQA1 t(24) = 1.82 p < 0.01; HLA-DQB1 t(30) = 2.53 p < 0.0001.

Following IFN-γ stimulation, monocytes from PD GG patients displayed a >200-fold increase in mRNA levels of all measured MHC-II genes relative to PD AA patients and CTRLs of either genotype (Fig 2C). With the exception of significantly decreased inducibility of HLA-DQA mRNA in the CTRL GG group, the inducibility of the rest of the MHC-II genes was the same in PD AA patients and CTRLs of either genotype. In summary, the GG genotype was associated with significantly increased HLA-DRA, -DRB1, and -DQB1 mRNA expression in resting B cells independent of disease. In resting monocytes, the high-risk genotype was also associated with increased HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 mRNA expression independent of disease. Finally, monocytes treated with IFN-γ from the PD GG group displayed higher levels of all MHC-II mRNA.

The rs3129882 high-risk genotype is associated with increased plasma CCL-3 (MIP-1α) levels in PD patients but not with altered frequencies of B cells and monocytes in the peripheral blood

In conjunction with cell-specific markers, differences in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) composition and blood levels of cytokines/chemokines can indicate an active inflammatory process. Flow cytometry analysis of Ficoll-Paque separated PBMCs demonstrated no change in B cell or monocyte frequency between any of the study groups (Fig S2A). The levels of 17 selected immunomodulatory cytokines and chemokines were measured by multiplexed chemiluminescent immunoassays (Fig S2B). Individuals in the PD GG group displayed increased circulating plasma levels of CCL-3 (also known as MIP-1α) greater than two-fold over the PD AA group. The levels of the other 16 cytokines and chemokines were not significantly different between the four groups (Fig S2B).

Pyrethroid exposure and the high-risk rs3129882 genotype increases odds for PD

To determine whether there are interactions between pesticide exposure and rs3129882 in PD, 465 incident PD patients (diagnosed within 3 years of recruitment) and 497 population controls of European ancestry from the Parkinson’s Environment and Gene (PEG) case-control study were examined. Basic demographic characteristics for the PEG study population can be found in Table S2. As expected, patients were more likely to be male and have a family history of PD, and less likely to have ever been smokers2,29,32. Our control population was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for HLA rs3129882 (p= 0.18). Genotype alone did not significantly influence PD risk, assuming previously reported genetic models (additive model: OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.86, 1.24 for those with one risk allele (AG) and OR=1.07, 95% CI=0.74, 1.55 for those with two risk alleles (GG); recessive model: OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.59, 1.16; Table 1)14,25. We did not detect interactions with organophosphates, dithiocarbamates, or paraquat and rs3129882.

Table 1. HLA-DRA rs3129882 marginal effects in PEG population, n=962 (patients=465, controls=497).

An additive model was used to assess the association between the rs3129882 G allele and Parkinson’s disease in the PEG population. Increased odds of developing PD was not associated with genotype alone in this population.

Genotype Cases n (%) Controls n (%) Adjusted OR (95% CI)a P- Value
AA 142 (0.31) 175 (0.35) 1.00 (ref) --
AG 243 (0.52) 227 (0.46) 1.03 (0.86, 1.24) 0.72
GG 80 (0.17) 95 (0.19) 1.07 (0.74, 1.55)
AA vs GG: 0.95 (0.65, 1.38) 0.78
AA/AG vs GG 0.83 (0.59, 1.16) 0.27
a

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, and smoking history.

Investigating pyrethroid pesticides, in logistic regression models we estimated a positive interaction on a multiplicative scale when comparing groups homozygous at the SNP (AA versus GG; interaction p-value=0.02; Table 2), and when we used an additive genetic model to include heterozygous individuals (interaction p-value=0.007; Table 2). In both models, neither the genotype alone nor pyrethroid exposure alone significantly influenced PD risk, but in those jointly exposed to pyrethroids and having a GG genotype we estimated significant increases in PD risk. For example, when comparing AA versus GG in those unexposed, we see a slight non-significant decrease in PD risk (OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.47, 1.14), and no effect when comparing pyrethroid exposure in those with the AA genotype (OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.65, 1.67), yet comparing those homozygous for the risk allele (GG) and exposed to pyrethroids to those with the AA genotype and unexposed, we see an increased risk of PD (OR=2.48, 95% CI=1.24, 4.97; Table 2).

Table 2. Interaction, main, and joint effect estimates between HLA rs3129882 and pyrethroid exposure in PEG study population of European ancestry, using both an additive genetic model and AA vs GG; n=962 (patients=465, controls=497).

Using both an additive genetic model and comparing only the homozygous groups, we assessed the association between pyrethroid exposure and the risk rs3129882 genotype in the risk for PD. The table indicates the adjusted odds ratio and p-values for the main and joint effects and the p=value for interaction.

Ambient Pyrethroidsb None 1+ pesticide
Cases n (%) Controls n (%) Adjusted ORa (95% CI) p value Cases n (%) Controls n (%) Adjusted ORa (95% CI) p value
Additive Genetic Model
AA 95 (0.30) 117 (0.33) 1.00 (ref) 47 (0.32) 58 (0.42) 0.83 (0.53, 1.28) 0.42
AG 172 (0.54) 161 (0.45) 0.91 (0.73, 1.13) 0.38 71 (0.48) 66 (0.48) 1.25 (0.88, 1.78) 0.22
GG 50 (0.16) 81 (0.23) 0.82 (0.53, 1.27) 30 (0.20) 14 (0.10) 1.87 (1.08, 3.35) 0.03
P=value for interaction: 0.02
AA vs GG
AA 95 (0.66) 117 (0.59) 1.00 (ref) 47 (0.61) 58 (0.81) 1.04 (0.65, 1.67) 0.87
GG 50 (0.34) 81 (0.41) 0.73 (0.47, 1.14) 0.17 30 (0.39) 14 (0.19) 2.48 (1.24, 4.97) 0.01
P=value for interaction: 0.007
a

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, and smoking history.

b

Ambient pesticide exposure to any pyrethroids (at or above the median level seen in exposed controls) at both occupation and residence, from 1974 (year of CA-PUR implementation) to 10 yrs before diagnosis or interview. Pyrethroid group includes fenvalerate, permethrin, phenothrin, resmethrin, flucythrinate, cypermethrin, (S)-cypermethrin, tau-fluvalinate, fenpropathrin, lamda-cyhalothrin, bifenthrin, esfenvalerate, and tralomethrin; Cyfluthrin had no exposure in study popluation.

Next, we assessed whether there were differences in disease characteristics of the AA vs GG individuals at baseline and during two follow up exams in a subset of the PEG population followed over time; mean years between baseline and exam 1 was 3.5 years (SEM=0.1) and exam 2 was 5.6 years (SEM=0.2). We did not see any significant differences in measures of disease-related clinical progression between AA and GG individuals at baseline or either follow-up time point (Table S3).

Genetic variation associated with ethnicity can reverse allelic rs3129882 association of MHC-II expression changes

In order to contextualize the discrepancies among various GWAS with associations of the rs3129882 with risk for PD, we used the GeneVar software tool to interrogate the HapMap3 cis-eQTL database. The HapMap3 database is unique in that it consists of 726 lymphoblastoid cell lines developed from individuals of 8 different ethnic groups. We tested the hypothesis that association of SNP genotype with cis-eQTL level in the MHC-II locus would be affected by ethnicity. Indeed, we observed that in the individuals of the HapMap3 database, the allele that was associated with increased eQTL level depended on ethnicity (Table 3). For example, the G allele was associated with increased levels of HLA-DRB1 eQTL in Utah Caucasians (rho=0.199, p=0.038) but with decreased levels in Han Chinese (rho=−0.281, p=0.0124) and Nigerian Yoruba (rho=−0.317, p=8.0E-4). Furthermore, HLA-DRB5 eQTL level was positively associated with the G allele in Utah Caucasians (rho=0.516, p=9.3E-9) but negatively associated with the G allele in most of the other ethnic groups.

Table 3. The direction of association of cis-eQTL level with the rs3129882 genotype depends on ethnicity.

The level of HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DRB5 cis-eQTLs were significantly associated with rs3129882 genotype and were within 500 kilobasepairs of the rs3129882 SNP in the HapMap3 database. Association was reported as Spearman’s rank correlation (rho) with p-value for all the ethnic groups within the database.

HLA-DRB1 rho p- value HLA-DRB5 rho p-value
Utah Caucasians 0.199 0.038 Utah Caucasians 0.516 9.30E-09
Han Chinese −0.281 0.0124 Han Chinese −0.038 0.7396
Gujarati Indians in Houston, TX, USA −0.017 0.8774 Gujarati Indians in Houston, TX, USA 0.242 0.0283
Japanese in Tokyo, Japan 0.038 0.7364 Japanese in Tokyo, Japan −0.131 0.2393
Luhya in Kenya −0.347 0.0014 Luhya in Kenya −0.315 0.0039
Mexicans in Los Angeles, CA, USA 0.052 0.7333 Mexicans in Los Angeles, CA, USA 0.193 0.2029
Masaii in Kenya −0.338 5.20E-05 Masaii in Kenya −0.037 0.666
Yoruba in Nigeria −0.317 8.00E-04 Yoruba in Nigeria −0.122 0.2079

Discussion

The MHC-II locus and particularly the rs3129882 SNP, has been implicated in modulating risk for PD14,15,20; and herein, we demonstrate that the G allele of this SNP, acting together with environmental pyrethroids exposure, increases the odds of developing PD and is associated with altered MHC-II expression in peripheral APCs. The association of the high risk genotype with altered MHC-II expression was revealed by: 1) increased surface protein expression of HLA-DR in monocytes; 2) greater inducibility of HLA-DQ surface protein expression in monocytes in response to IFN-γ; 3) increased mRNA expression of HLA-DRA, -DRB1, and -DQB1 genes; and 4) greater inducibility of mRNA expression in PD patients’ monocytes after IFN-γ stimulation. Notably, within our MHC-II expression study cohort more PD patients tended to be male and controls, who were often caregivers, tended to be women. Despite this unequal sex distribution, stratification of the data by sex did not account for statistical differences in MHC-II expression (data not shown). Taken together, the data indicate that in our cohort, GG homozygosity at the rs3129882 SNP is associated with increased baseline and inducible MHC-II expression in APCs. This immune hyper-responsiveness may in turn be one reason why this SNP has been associated with altering risk for late-onset PD. Specifically, the findings revealed that monocytes from individuals in our cohort with the G allele have more antigen-presenting capacity under resting conditions; and that within the context of PD, cytokine challenge increases mRNA expression of MHC-II genes approximately 200-fold. Surprisingly, plasma levels of cytokines were unchanged among all four groups except for increased MIP-1α in the PD GG group relative to the PD AA group, suggesting that immune risk for PD may be better predicted by cell-associated immune molecules rather than measurement of global fluid biomarkers. The pathologic significance of an isolated elevation in a single plasma chemokine is unclear. These novel findings directly implicate regulation of MHC-II expression and antigen presentation as important mechanisms underlying the reported association between late-onset PD and the MHC-II locus. This evidence supports a role for immunological processes and the synergy between these processes and environmental exposures such as pyrethroids in determining an individual’s susceptibility to PD.

On the basis of the studies reported here, we speculate that the rs3129882 SNP is a marker in some populations for a genetic and/or epigenetic mechanism(s) that control the expression of the MHC-II locus. A common mechanism in the MHC-II locus that promotes risk for PD may exist in many different human populations but may be marked by different disease-associated SNPs. Evidence for this is indicated by the divergent associations reported in GWAS in Han Chinese cohorts where the A allele is associated with increased PD risk while in European cohorts, the G allele is associated with increased risk14,15,24,25. The ethnicity-dependent directional changes in the HapMap3 database cis-eQTL associations in Table 3 also point to the importance of taking into account ethnic differences when studying genetic variation at the MHC-II locus. Thus, the association of various MHC-II SNPs with PD likely depends heavily on ethnic make-up and exposome.

The expression of genes at this locus is regulated by a complex interplay between transcription factors, chromatin architecture, DNA methylation sites, and histone remodeling 33. In unstimulated cells from GG individuals in our cohort, mRNA expression of HLA-DRA, DRB1, and DQB1 is increased, suggesting a mechanism that allows for basal increases in transcription of these genes (Fig 2A, 2B). The increase in the levels of β-subunit mRNAs is particularly interesting because the α-subunit mRNAs are typically much more abundant, making the level of β-subunit mRNAs an important limiting factor in production of mature MHC-II molecules. However, only in PD patients was the rs3129882 G allele associated with increased IFN-γ inducibility of mRNA expression of all the MHC-II genes. In CTRLs, the IFN-γ inducibility of HLA-DQA and HLA-DRA mRNA expression was significantly decreased (Fig 2C). This phenomenon suggests that in controls, a regulatory mechanism may exist to limit the level of mRNA expression of MHC-II, i.e. a “ceiling effect” upon APC activation. If this turns out to be the case, our data suggest this regulatory mechanism may be absent (or perhaps is lost as a result of the disease process itself) in individuals with a SNP in the MHC-II locus that hence increases risk of PD. Irrespective of the mechanism, enhanced transcription of MHC-II genes would be expected to increase surface expression of these molecules, resulting in functional consequences for engagement of the adaptive immune system.

Engagement of the adaptive immune system through MHC-II peptide presentation would allow for a specific, chronic inflammatory response mediated by CD4+ T cells26. Shifts in the overall levels of MHC-II and/or the relative levels of MHC-II isotypes could impact normal immunologic processes in two main ways. First, antigenic peptide epitopes that promote pathogenesis leading to PD may be more likely to be presented to the adaptive immune system and dominate immune responses34. This could occur through skewed expression of HLA-DQ proteins. Second, the presentation of certain peptides on different MHC-II isotypes could alter the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into various subsets (i.e., Th1, Th2, Th17, or Tregs)35. Evidence for such phenomena can be demonstrated in human autoimmune disease and humanized rodent models of autoimmunity36. In this manner, antigen presentation via MHC-II on the surface of APCs to CD4+ T cells is a mechanism that could link the contribution of both genetic background and environmental exposure to susceptibility for developing PD.

In the context of risk for PD, two people who are exposed to the same insult are likely to respond very differently immunologically given their genetic and epigenetic background. Within the context of our findings, following exposure to an environmental agent such as pyrethroids or an event such as traumatic brain injury, we would predict that an individual with the AA genotype in our cohort (Fig 3A) might display an immune response that resolves completely in a few weeks. By contrast, an individual from our cohort with the GG genotype (Fig 3B) might display a heightened immune response that may not resolve quickly but may instead promote chronic neuroinflammation, thereby hastening degeneration of vulnerable neuronal populations. Indeed, an adaptive immune response that is propagated in response to highly specific antigens differentially presented by APCs from people with high-risk versus low-risk MHC-II alleles can explain the selective degeneration of vulnerable neuronal populations as is the case in PD.

Fig 3. Model depicting the association of the rs3129882 SNP with altered MHC-II expression on APCs and the potential for skewing the adaptive immune response and the predicted effects on vulnerable neuronal populations affected in PD.

Fig 3

Our data suggest that the rs3129882 SNP is linked to a genetic or epigenetic element that increases mRNA expression of MHC-II and ultimately surface expression of MHC-II. Increased surface expression of MHC-II can influence CD4+ T cell activation and differentiation leading to a heightened proinflammatory state that hastens neuronal dysfunction and death and predisposed individuals to PD. Two individuals exposed to the same environmental stimulus, one with the low risk SNP (A) and the other with the high risk SNP (B), are likely to respond differently immunologically because of underlying genetic and epigenetic mechanism(s) that influence MHC-II expression.

In agreement with our understanding of risk for PD, environmental stimuli, such as pyrethroids, are likely to play a prominent role in synergizing with the differential immune responses associated with this SNP given that few HLA haplotype associations have been reported for PD risk and none segregate with this SNP18. Pyrethroid exposure has been associated in humans with acute alterations in immunoglobulin levels and T cell frequencies37 and in animal models with altered APC function38. Related to Parkinson’s disease, pyrethroids are associated with increased striatal dopamine uptake, increased striatal dopamine metabolism, and altered electroencephalographic activity in the SN in chronically exposed rodent models3941. Other pesticides have been shown to directly impact antigen presentation and although this has not been reported for pyrethroids it is possible their effects on immune cells may explain the synergism with the MHC-II locus to increase risk for PD42. The identified combined risk conferred by the rs3129882 G allele and pyrethroids may be explained by complex interactions that impact both the nervous system and the immune system to initiate PD pathogenesis through voltage-gated sodium channels that are known targets of this class of pesticides. The follow-up of the PEG patients only cohort suggested no association between the G allele and disease severity/progression (Table S3). However, longer follow-up time may be necessary to reveal differences in disease progression that are not yet apparent in this cohort. It is important to note that subject recruitment occurred through a state-wide registry with 30 years of exposure data; and PD patients underwent a neurologic examination by movement disorder specialists. Our study is the first population-based analysis to explore and report pyrethroid-gene variant interactions; and thus, it requires replication in an independent sample. Longitudinal studies of the MHC-II locus and PD would clarify the role of this locus in increasing risk.

The significance of our findings is three-fold. First, we provided direct evidence from human peripheral blood that implicates a mechanism for antigen presentation and the role of adaptive immunity in risk for PD. Functional studies that link GWAS hits to functional cellular changes are the next step in understanding how genetics, environment, and cellular responses synergize to increase risk for complex diseases. Second, our findings suggest that the level and quality of MHC-II expression could prove to be an effective immune marker for the prediction of disease susceptibility in addition to honing our understanding of disease pathogenesis. Third, our data suggest that cellular biomarkers may prove more useful than soluble molecules in plasma and CSF to identify individuals at risk for disease or for patient recruitment into neuroprotective trials testing immunomodulatory drugs.

Methods

MHC-II Expression Cohort Subject Recruitment

PD patients and age-matched healthy CTRL subjects were recruited through the Clinical Research in Neurology (CRIN) IRB-approved research protocol at the Emory Movement Disorders Clinic and community outreach events sponsored by the American Parkinson’s Disease Association, Wilkins Parkinson’s Foundation, and Emory Udall Center of Excellence for Parkinson’s Reasearch. Participants were excluded if they were younger than 50 years old, were older than 85 years old, or had neurologic, chronic infectious, or autoimmune comorbidities, and/or known familial PD mutations. For subjects not originally in the Emory cohort of the Hamza et al., 2010 study in which participants’ first HLA-DRA intron was sequenced, the rs3129882 Taqman SNP Genotyping Assay (Life Technologies) was used to genotype newly recruited subjects. Subjects homozygous at the rs3129882 locus were asked to provide a blood sample (~50 mL). At the time of recruitment, a questionnaire was used to assess disease and inflammation/immune-relevant environmental exposures and comorbidities. Caffeine, NSAID, and nicotine intake was calculated as mg-years, dose-years, and mg-years, respectively. Levodopa equivalence dose was calculated based on parameters defined by the Parkinson’s Disease Society of the United Kingdom.

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC) Isolation, Sorting, and Stimulation

PBMCs were isolated from whole blood using Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare) density centrifugation. The upper plasma layer was frozen immediately at −80°C. B cells and monocytes were isolated by positive selection from total PBMCs using anti-CD19 and CD14 paramagnetic beads, respectively (Miltenyi Biotec). Remaining cell fraction was analyzed by flow cytometry for quality control of sorting. For stimulation, monocytes were plated overnight with or without IFN-γ (PeproTech) in a 6-well plate at 5×105 cells per well for flow cytometry or at 2×106 cells per well for RNA isolation.

RNA Isolation, cDNA synthesis, and RT-PCR

Cells were washed once in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed in 350 μL RLT buffer (Qiagen) supplemented with 1% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell lysate was centrifuged through a Qiashredder (Qiagen) and then immediately frozen at −80°C. Later, RNA was fully isolated using RNAeasy Isolation Kit (Qiagen) and stored at −80°C. For cDNA synthesis, 0.5–2 μg of total mRNA was used per reaction in reverse transcription reactions using Superscript II (Life Technologies Corp) with oligo dT and random hexamer primers (Life Technologies Corp). The amount of SYBR-incorporated amplicons were measured for all real-time quantitative Bio-Rad iCycler instruments (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with an iQ optical module were used to measure the amount of SYBR incorporated amplicons for all real-time quantitative PCR reactions. DNA oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA Technologies) used for primers listed in Table S4 were diluted to a final concentration of 100 nM for PCR reactions. All primers were tested by agarose gel electrophoresis to ensure that they formed single amplicon products of the correct size and optimized for Tm by temperature gradient real-time PCR followed by a melt curve analysis.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

To stain for flow cytometry, 5×105 cells per well were incubated in 1x FACS buffer (1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% sodium azide, 1 mM EDTA) for 20 minutes at 4°C with anti-human HLA-DR:allophycocyanin/APC (1:20, BD Biosciences 559866), anti-human HLA-DQ FITC (1:20, BD Biosciences 347453), anti-human CD14:phycoerythrin/PE (1:100, Biolegend #301806) and anti-human CD19:peridinin chlorophyll/PerCP (1:100, Biolegend #302228). Cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Services) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were stored in 1x FACS Buffer at 4°C until run on FACS Calibur within 1 week of staining. Spherobeads (BD Biosciences) and OneComp Beads (ebiosciences) were used to set voltages and compensation settings between runs. Analysis of flow cytometry data was performed on FlowJo Software v10.0.6.

Mesoscale Discovery Multiplex ELISA

Plasma was obtained from the upper layer of Ficoll-Paque separation and stored at −80°C until sample analysis was performed. Plasma analyte levels were measured in duplicate using the Human Pro-inflammmatory Cytokine 7-plex, Human Chemokine V-PLEX, and Human CRP plates (Meso Scale Discovery). For measurement of CRP, samples were diluted 1:200. For all other assays, samples were measured undiluted.

Genevar Analysis

Genevar 3.3.0 software (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute) was used to interrogate the HapMap3 cis-eQTL database. Association of levels of cis-eQTLs within 500 kilobasepairs of the rs3129882 SNP with SNP genotype for all the ethnic groups included in the database was reported as Spearman’s rank correlation (rho) with p-value.

Pesticide Exposure Cohort and Epidemiological Methods

The PEG case-control study recruited incident PD cases and controls from three highly agricultural counties in Central California, Kern, Fresno, and Tulare, between January 2001 and December 2013. Population-based controls were recruited from the same tri-county study area and in the same age range as the cases using residential tax assessor’s records. All subjects were required to have lived in California for at least 5 years and PD patients were examined at least once by our movement disorder specialists, multiple times, and met published criteria for idiopathic PD43. We described the details of case definitions44 and subject recruitment45 elsewhere. All procedures were approved by the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Human Subjects Committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

In telephone interviews with patients and controls, we obtained detailed information on demographic characteristics, risk factors, and lifetime occupational and residential histories. We estimated ambient pesticide exposures resulting primarily from commercial applications to agricultural crops using a geographic information system (GIS) based computer model that links geocoded lifetime residential and occupations addresses of each participant to information on all commercial pesticide applications (date, location, and amount applied) from California State mandated pesticide use reports (CA-PUR) and land use data as published previously46. For each pesticide, we summed the pounds applied per year per acre within a 500-m radius buffer of an address since 1974 (year of CA-PUR mandate) and calculated study period average exposures for each subject and pesticide by summing the year-specific average exposures from 1974 to 10 years prior to the subject’s index year (date of diagnosis for patients and interview for controls), and divided the sum by the number of years in the relevant time period. We substituted years missing a geocoded location with the average value of all recorded years for each pesticide and person. We then dichotomized exposures based on the pesticide-specific median level in exposed controls (at or above). Participants could have received exposure at either residential or workplace addresses, or both.

The pesticide classes we examined were all previously identified as immunomodulatory47. Aside from paraquat, each of the pesticides fell into three different chemical classes: organophosphates, dithiocarbamates, and pyrethroids. After assessing exposure to individual pesticides, we counted the total number of pesticides in each group that each participant was exposed to at each location (residence/workplace address), and classified each participant as highly exposed (at or above the median number of pesticides in exposed controls) or receiving low/no exposure (none or below the median number of pesticides) based on the distribution for the total number of pesticides in exposed controls, except for the pyrethroids, where 75% of the exposed control population was only exposed to one pyrethroid pesticide, and we thus used the categories ‘no’ exposure versus exposure to one or more pyrethroid.

We used student’s two-tailed t-test or a chi-square test to investigate differences in demographic factors between patients and controls. We assessed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for HLA rs3129882 in control participants using a chi-square test and then evaluated association between the SNP and PD using logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), assuming a recessive and additive genetic model as done in prior reports14,25, and adjusted for potential confounders including age (continuous, at diagnosis for patients and interview for controls), sex, ever/never smoking status (having smoked at least 1 cigarette per week for at least a year). To assess gene-environment interactions between HLA rs3129882 and pesticide groups, we introduced a multiplicative interaction term into a logistic model assuming an additive genetic model and comparing only the AA and GG genotypes. Thus, we performed targeted analyses for specific chemicals (three different chemical classes and paraquat) selected a priori based on literature that suggest possible immune-modulatory effects of pesticides implicated in PD pathogenesis and for only one SNP. We used Quanto version 1.2.448 for power calculations and SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for all other analysis. In order to determine the rs3129882 genotype of the PEG cohort, samples were coded to blind the researchers and the rs3129882 Taqman SNP Genotyping Assay (Life Technologies) was used for genotyping.

Statistical Analyses

A one-tailed Students’ t-test was used to make comparisons between the high risk and low risk genotype groups in the immunophenotyping studies at Emory University. One-way and two-way analysis of variance followed by Holm-Sidak post-hoc tests were used when to compare the baseline characteristics of the study population and inducibility of the response to IFN-γ between the high risk and low risk, respectively, as indicated in figure legends. The Pearson coefficient was used to assess the correlation between two variables. Graphpad (Prism) and R (GNU project) software was used to perform statistical analyses. See Pesticide Exposure Cohort and Epidemiological Methods section above for detailed description of statistical methods used to interrogate the pesticide exposure cohort.

Study approval

Written informed consent was received from participants prior to inclusion in the study. All participants provided written informed consent prior to inclusion in the research studies, and all procedures were approved a priori by the Institutional Review Board of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia or of UCLA in Los Angeles, California.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We thank B. G. Barwick for assistance with statistical analysis and members of the Boss and Tansey labs for helpful discussions. We also thank E. Sperin and K. Tansey for assistance with blood collection.

Financial support for the authors was provided by The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research Target Validation program (JMB), a pilot grant from Emory Udall Center 1P50NS071669 (JMB, MGT), a pilot grant from the Emory PD-CERC 5P01ES016731-04 (MGT), NIH/NINDS R01NS072467-04 (MGT and JKL), NIH/NINDS F31 NS081830-01 (GTK) and NIH/NIGMS RO1 GM47310-16 (JMB), and the Sartain Lanier Family Foundation (SAF). For the PEG study funding was received from NIEHS RO1ES10544, P01ES016732, U54ES12078, and the UCLA-UDALL center NINDS# P50NS038367; pilot funding was received from The American Parkinson’s Disease Association.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.Ross OA. A prognostic view on the application of individualized genomics in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013;1:52–57. doi: 10.1007/s40142-012-0003-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Factor S, Weiner W. Parkinson’s Disease: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Demos Medical Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barnum CJ, Tansey MG. Neuroinflammation and non-motor symptoms: the dark passenger of Parkinson’s disease? Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2012;12:350–358. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bower JH, et al. Head trauma preceding PD: a case-control study. Neurology. 2003;60:1610–1615. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000068008.78394.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hatcher JM, Pennell KD, Miller GW. Parkinson’s disease and pesticides: a toxicological perspective. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2008;29:322–329. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taetzsch T, Block ML. Pesticides, microglial NOX2, and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology. 2013;27:137–149. doi: 10.1002/jbt.21464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanthasamy A, et al. Emerging neurotoxic mechanisms in environmental factors-induced neurodegeneration. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33:833–837. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Waldburger JM, et al. Lessons from the bare lymphocyte syndrome: molecular mechanisms regulating MHC class II expression. Immunological reviews. 2000;178:148–165. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.17813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tansey MG, Goldberg MS. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: its role in neuronal death and implications for therapeutic intervention. Neurobiology of disease. 2010;37:510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saunders JA, et al. CD4+ regulatory and effector/memory T cell subsets profile motor dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology. 2012;7:927–938. doi: 10.1007/s11481-012-9402-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brochard V, et al. Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2009;119:182–192. doi: 10.1172/JCI36470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rees K, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as disease-modifying agents for Parkinson’s disease: evidence from observational studies. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011:CD008454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008454.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bower JH, Ritz B. Is the answer for Parkinson disease already in the medicine cabinet?: Unfortunately not. Neurology. 2011;76:854–855. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820f2e7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamza TH, et al. Common genetic variation in the HLA region is associated with late-onset sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Nature genetics. 2010;42:781–785. doi: 10.1038/ng.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guo Y, et al. HLA rs3129882 variant in Chinese Han patients with late-onset sporadic Parkinson disease. Neuroscience letters. 2011;501:185–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ahmed I, et al. Association between Parkinson’s disease and the HLA-DRB1 locus. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2012;27:1104–1110. doi: 10.1002/mds.25035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hill-Burns EM, Factor SA, Zabetian CP, Thomson G, Payami H. Evidence for more than one Parkinson’s disease-associated variant within the HLA region. PloS one. 2011;6:e27109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wissemann WT, et al. Association of Parkinson’s disease with structural and regulatory variants in the HLA region. AJHG. 2013;93:984–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Satake W, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies common variants at four loci as genetic risk factors for Parkinson’s disease. Nature genetics. 2009;41:1303–1307. doi: 10.1038/ng.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.International Parkinson Disease Genomics C et al. Imputation of sequence variants for identification of genetic risks for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet. 2011;377:641–649. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62345-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun C, et al. HLA-DRB1 alleles are associated with the susceptibility to sporadic Parkinson’s disease in Chinese Han population. PloS one. 2012;7:e48594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Latourelle JC, Dumitriu A, Hadzi TC, Beach TG, Myers RH. Evaluation of Parkinson disease risk variants as expression-QTLs. PloS one. 2012;7:e46199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nalls MA, et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson’s disease. Nature genetics. 2014 doi: 10.1038/ng.3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao Y, et al. Association of HLA locus variant in Parkinson’s disease. Clinical genetics. 2013;84:501–504. doi: 10.1111/cge.12024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Puschmann A, et al. Human leukocyte antigen variation and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2011;17:376–378. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, Xia B. CD4(+)T cells: differentiation and functions. Clinical & developmental immunology. 2012;2012:925135. doi: 10.1155/2012/925135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen H, et al. Smoking duration, intensity, and risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2010;74:878–884. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d55f38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen H, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of Parkinson disease. Archives of neurology. 2003;60:1059–1064. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hernan MA, Takkouche B, Caamano-Isorna F, Gestal-Otero JJ. A meta-analysis of coffee drinking, cigarette smoking, and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Annals of neurology. 2002;52:276–284. doi: 10.1002/ana.10277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boss JM. Regulation of transcription of MHC class II genes. Current opinion in immunology. 1997;9:107–113. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(97)80166-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Collins T, et al. Immune interferon activates multiple class II major histocompatibility complex genes and the associated invariant chain gene in human endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1984;81:4917–4921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2004;363:1783–1793. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16305-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Choi NM, Majumder P, Boss JM. Regulation of major histocompatibility complex class II genes. Current opinion in immunology. 2011;23:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sant AJ, Chaves FA, Leddon SA, Tung J. The Control of the Specificity of CD4 T Cell Responses: Thresholds, Breakpoints, and Ceilings. Frontiers in immunology. 2013;4:340. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tao X, Constant S, Jorritsma P, Bottomly K. Strength of TCR signal determines the costimulatory requirements for Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T cell differentiation. Journal of immunology. 1997;159:5956–5963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taneja V, David CS. Role of HLA class II genes in susceptibility/resistance to inflammatory arthritis: studies with humanized mice. Immunological reviews. 2010;233:62–78. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Costa C, et al. Cytokine patterns in greenhouse workers occupationally exposed to alpha-cypermethrin: an observational study. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2013;36:796–800. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Righi DA, Xavier FG, Palermo-Neto J. Effects of type II pyrethroid cyhalothrin on rat innate immunity: a flow cytometric study. International immunopharmacology. 2009;9:148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bloomquist JR, Barlow RL, Gillette JS, Li W, Kirby ML. Selective effects of insecticides on nigrostriatal dopaminergic nerve pathways. Neurotoxicology. 2002;23:537–544. doi: 10.1016/s0161-813x(02)00031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cremer JE, Cunningham VJ, Ray DE, Sarna GS. Regional changes in brain glucose utilization in rats given a pyrethroid insecticide. Brain research. 1980;194:278–282. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91344-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Doherty JD, Morii N, Hiromori T, Ohnishi J. Pyrethroids and the striatal dopaminergic system in vivo. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. C, Comparative pharmacology and toxicology. 1988;91:371–375. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(88)90044-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Esa AH, Warr GA, Newcombe DS. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorus compounds. Modulation of cell-mediated immune responses by inhibition of monocyte accessory functions. Clinical immunology and immunopathology. 1988;49:41–52. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(88)90093-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 1992;55:181–184. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jacob EL, Gatto NM, Thompson A, Bordelon Y, Ritz B. Occurrence of depression and anxiety prior to Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2010;16:576–581. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang A, et al. Parkinson’s disease risk from ambient exposure to pesticides. European journal of epidemiology. 2011;26:547–555. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9574-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cockburn M, et al. Prostate cancer and ambient pesticide exposure in agriculturally intensive areas in California. American journal of epidemiology. 2011;173:1280–1288. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Corsini E, Sokooti M, Galli CL, Moretto A, Colosio C. Pesticide induced immunotoxicity in humans: a comprehensive review of the existing evidence. Toxicology. 2013;307:123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Morrison G. QUANTO 1.1: A computer program for power and sample size calculations for genetic-epidemiology studies. 2006 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES