Abstract
Purpose of review
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of congenital infection in the world. Symptomatic infants are at increased risk of developing permanent sequelae, including sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and neurodevelopmental delay. Advances in the treatment and prevention of congenital CMV infection are a high priority nationally and globally.
Recent findings
In symptomatic infants, antiviral therapy with 6 months of oral valganciclovir (VGCV) improves hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Strategies to prevent congenital or maternal CMV infections, including the use of CMV hyperimmune globulin (HIG) and development of a maternal vaccine, have yet to yield positive results.
Summary
The clinical significance of congenital CMV infection, developments in antiviral therapy, and efforts to prevent congenital disease are herein reviewed.
Keywords: Congenital cytomegalovirus, Antiviral therapy, Valganciclovir, Vaccine, Mother-to-child transmission
Introduction
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is ubiquitous in humans and, while it commonly leads to asymptomatic or self-limited infection in healthy children and adults, it is a major cause of sequelae in congenitally infected infants and immunocompromised populations. Congenital CMV infection contributes to a large global burden of disease, including permanent hearing loss and neurocognitive disabilities. In this review, we will highlight the clinical significance of congenital CMV infection, developments in antiviral therapy aimed at improving long-term outcomes in symptomatic infants, and efforts to prevent congenital disease by interrupting maternal-fetal transmission or preventing maternal infection during pregnancy.
Clinical Significance of Congenital CMV Infection
CMV is the most common cause of congenital infection worldwide [1]. The incidence of congenital CMV infection ranges from 0.5% to 2% of all live births, affecting upwards of 30,000 infants per year in the United States [1, 2]. Maternal CMV seroprevalence varies widely, ranging from 45 to 100%, with higher prevalence and earlier CMV acquisition associated with non-white race and lower socioeconomic status [3, 4]. In utero transmission of CMV occurs in mothers with no evidence of CMV immunity who become infected during pregnancy (primary infection), but can also occur in women with preexisting antibody to CMV either by reactivation of previous maternal infection or by acquisition of a different viral strain during pregnancy [5]. Primary maternal CMV infection during pregnancy is associated with a greater risk of in utero transmission, but due to the high prevalence of disease in the overall population, nearly two-thirds of infants with congenital CMV infection are born to mothers with preexisting antibody to CMV [6].
In infants congenitally infected with CMV, approximately 10–15% have clinically apparent disease at birth (“symptomatic” neonates). Clinical manifestations can range from mild, transient findings to severe multi-system dysfunction and may include intrauterine growth restriction, petechiae, jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, chorioretinitis, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). These symptomatic infants are at increased risk of developing permanent sequelae, most commonly SNHL and neurodevelopmental delay. Even in the 85–90% of infants without clinically apparent disease at birth (“asymptomatic” neonates), approximately 10–15% go on to develop late-onset sequelae, primarily SNHL [7, 8]. Although primary infection is associated with more severe sequelae, prior maternal immunity is only partially protective, and does not completely protect from hearing loss [9, 10].
Inclusive of symptomatic disease and asymptomatic infection, congenital CMV infection is the leading non-genetic cause of SNHL, estimated to be responsible for one-third of all cases in children [11]. Hearing loss occurs in nearly 50% of infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection, while 7% of asymptomatically infected infants develop hearing loss [12, 13]. CMV-related hearing loss is often delayed in onset, presenting after the newborn period, and can produce a progressive or fluctuating course. In addition to SNHL, vestibular disorders have also been found to occur frequently in children with congenital CMV infection [14].
One of the challenges of assessing the clinical impact of congenital CMV infection is identifying which patients will go on to have permanent sequelae. Infants with severe symptomatic infection are more likely to develop permanent disability, but as of yet, no reliable biomarker has been identified to predict which infants with mild to moderate symptomatology or with asymptomatic infection will develop SNHL. Viral load, as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in blood (reported as DNAemia in some studies) may have the most potential in this regard, but has yet to be clearly established. In a treatment trial of infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection, lower viral loads over time correlated with better short-term and long-term (24 months) hearing outcomes, illustrating proof of concept but failing to identify a clinically helpful threshold below which outcomes are better and above which outcomes are worse [15**]. Another recent study followed a small group of infants with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection through 6 years of age and found that asymptomatic infants with viral loads at birth greater than or equal to 17,000 copies/mL were more likely to develop SNHL, but the study was handicapped by a sample size of only 33 infants [16*]. Further studies are needed to delineate the utility of viral load as a predictor of sequelae. If such a marker could be validated, it would provide a reasonable rationale for designing clinical trials in which a biomarker is used to initiate targeted antiviral therapy in asymptomatically infected infants who are at higher risk for SNHL.
Treatment of Congenital CMV Infection
Initial investigations into antiviral therapeutics aimed at mitigating the long-term sequelae of congenital CMV infection have centered upon the acyclic deoxyguanosine nucleoside analog ganciclovir (GCV), and its oral prodrug valganciclovir (VGCV). An early study performed by the Collaborative Antiviral Study Group (CASG) demonstrated that 6 weeks of intravenous GCV (6mg/kg/dose given every 12 hours) improved hearing outcomes in symptomatic infants with central nervous system (CNS) involvement [17]. In this study, no patients receiving GCV had worsening of their hearing between baseline and 6 months. Despite the promising improvement in outcome, the utility of this intervention was limited by the high rate of clinically significant neutropenia that developed in patients receiving intravenous GCV, as well as the challenge of maintaining long-term intravenous access. A follow-up pharmacokinetic study from the same group determined that VGCV at a dose of 16mg/kg/dose given orally twice daily attained comparable systemic exposure as intravenous GCV, thus providing an oral option for the treatment of symptomatic congenital CMV infection [18].
Based upon the fact that infants with congenital CMV infection demonstrate prolonged viral shedding and delayed or progressive sequelae [19], the CASG hypothesized that a longer duration of viral suppression during the first months of life may further improve outcomes. To test this, the CASG conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing 6 weeks of oral VGCV therapy with 6 months of oral VGCV therapy in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection [15**]. VGCV was evaluated at the dose of 16mg/kg/dose given twice daily, and the primary end point of the study was the change in best-ear hearing from baseline to 6 month (assessed by brainstem auditory evoked response). Secondary endpoints included change in hearing from baseline to follow-up at 12 and 24 months, as well as comparison of neurodevelopmental impairment between the study groups at 12 and 24 months. Endpoint analyses were adjusted to account for the presence of CNS involvement at baseline. While no difference in hearing outcome was detected between baseline and follow-up at 6 months, there was a modest, statistically significant improvement in hearing in the 6-month group at both 12 and 24 months. Neurodevelopmental outcomes, as measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III), at 24 months were also significantly better in the 6-month group as compared with the 6-week group. There was no difference in the frequency of neutropenia between the study groups, and the overall rate of neutropenia over the course of the study was lower than that which had previously been seen with intravenous GCV. Based upon this study, it can be concluded that a 6-month course of oral VGCV is a safe and effective therapeutic option for infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection. As always, the decision to treat newborns with symptomatic congenital CMV infection must be individualized and should involve counsel regarding the potential risks (neutropenia in approximately 20% of treated babies; carcinogenicity and gonadotoxicity in some animal models, but not seen in humans) and benefits (improved hearing and developmental outcomes) of prolonged antiviral therapy.
Infants with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection should not receive antiviral therapy. As previously mentioned, the design of a clinical trial investigating antiviral therapy for asymptomatic patients would be greatly aided by the identification of a biomarker that predicts those infants who are at increased risk for permanent sequelae.
It is important to identify all infants with congenital CMV infection so that appropriate developmental interventions and long-term follow up can be established. Children found to have congenital CMV infection should have hearing tested every 6 months for 3 years and then yearly for at least an additional 1–2 years. Any defects, including those in hearing and language, should be identified and promptly addressed with appropriate nonpharmacologic intervention (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, audiology amplification).
Prevention of Congenital and Maternal CMV Infections
In addition to the ongoing optimization of antiviral treatment aimed at reducing long-term sequelae of symptomatic congenital CMV infection, complementary efforts also are underway to prevent infections altogether or at least to ameliorate severe sequelae. Strategies to reduce the burden of congenital CMV disease include early detection and intervention in newborns by universal screening, prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), and prevention of maternal infection. In addition to these strategies, the mainstay of infection prevention involves education regarding sources of exposure and methods of behavioral risk modification to limit exposure.
Universal newborn screening is one method aimed at preventing long-term disability by early recognition and treatment of congenital CMV infection. Viral culture diagnostic modalities are labor intensive and time consuming, making routine universal screening using this modality infeasible in most facilities. Recent data from the CMV and Hearing Multicenter Screening (CHIMES) study have shown that real-time PCR assays in saliva and urine perform as well as viral culture, which provides a scalable diagnostic tool for high-volume screening [20**]. As such, a recent review considered universal newborn CMV screening as a strategy for early detection and therapeutic intervention to improve clinical outcomes in congenitally infected infants and projected that there was potential benefit to be gained [21*]. The authors estimated the number of children in the United States affected by CMV-related long-term sequelae and modeled the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions and antiviral therapy on hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes, concluding that newborn CMV screening would positively impact the outcomes of several thousand children per year [21*].
Antenatal interventions as a means of preventing fetal CMV infection are also under investigation. In pregnant women with primary CMV infection, prevention of MTCT via passive immunization with CMV hyperimmune globulin (HIG) has been theorized but efficacy remains unproven. An initial cohort study suggested a lower rate of fetal infection in pregnant women who chose to receive HIG, but as this was an uncontrolled, nonrandomized study [22]. A subsequent phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study evaluated the efficacy of HIG for the reduction of MTCT of CMV infection in 124 women with primary CMV infection during pregnancy. The study group that received HIG was found to have fetal transmission rate of 30%, while the placebo group’s rate of transmission was slightly higher at 44% [23*]. The difference between these rates of maternal-fetal transmission in the 2 study groups did not reach statistical significance, however, indicating that CMV HIG does not effectively prevent congenital CMV infection in pregnant women with primary infection. Mothers who received HIG also experienced greater frequency of obstetric-related adverse events. Given the lack of demonstrated efficacy and the increased risk of adverse events, CMV HIG should not routinely be used during pregnancy for the prevention of congenital CMV infection. Further investigation of HIG as a means of prevention congenital CMV infection is underway with a large-scale phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study that is currently seeking to enroll 800 pregnant women in the United States (www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01376778).
Even as further studies seek to reduce maternal-fetal transmission of CMV, a more fundamental method for reducing the incidence of congenital CMV infection involves prevention of maternal CMV infection through an effective vaccination program. Based on cost analyses and the significant public health impact of congenital CMV disease, the Institute of Medicine ranked the development of a CMV vaccine as the highest priority in its 2000 report [24].
Investigation into CMV vaccines began over 4 decades ago with live-attenuated virus candidates, but these failed to yield adequate protection. More recent efforts with recombinant live-attenuated CMV vaccines with deletion of genes responsible for immune evasion have shown promise in animal model [25**]. This recombinant virus was demonstrated to be substantially attenuated in an immunocompromised guinea pig model, yet it induced antibody responses comparable to wild-type infection, reduced the rate of transplacental infection, and reduced the mortality of guinea pig pups as compared with the control pups born to unvaccinated mothers. These promising results support further development of recombinant live-attenuated CMV vaccine candidates.
Subunit vaccines are another class of CMV vaccine candidates and are largely focused on the immunogenic capacity of surface glycoprotein B (gB). A previous phase 2 study of a gB/MF59 adjuvant subunit vaccine in seronegative postpartum women demonstrated vaccine efficacy of approximately 50% [26]. This study demonstrated the potential for maternal vaccination as a means of preventing congenital CMV infection. A recent guinea pig model has been developed in which glycoprotein homologs can be studied individually or in glycoprotein complex formation in order to better understand function and immunogenicity [27]. Models such as this may prove vital to the development of future CMV vaccine candidates.
Recent analyses of clinical isolates have underscored the genomic diversity of CMV strains, with high rates of recombination and the establishment of naturally circulating genetic variants demonstrated to be hallmarks of its viral evolution [28, 29]. Given this molecular diversity, it is unlikely that a single antigenic component will generate a sufficiently broad immunogenicity to protect against CMV infection. Multivalent vaccine candidates may overcome this challenge by eliciting a broadened immunogenicity. One such subunit vaccine candidate combined gB and pp65 and was studied in guinea pig model. Interestingly, the gB/pp65 combination vaccine induced antibody responses that were significantly lower than the monovalent gB comparator vaccine [30*]. The gB/pp65 combination vaccine also failed to reduce transplacental transmission of infection. Several other multi-component subunit and DNA vaccine candidates aimed at achieving broad cross-neutralizing humoral and cellular immune responses are in the early stages of investigation [2]. Ultimately, the complex nature of maternal protective immunity, including the risk of reinfection with genetically distinct viral strains in women with prior immunity, indicates that many challenges remain to the development of an effective CMV vaccine program [31*].
Conclusion
Recent advancements in the treatment of symptomatic congenital CMV infection demonstrate that 6 months of oral VGCV improves hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Infants with asymptomatic infection should not receive antiviral therapy but should be prospectively monitored for late-onset hearing loss and developmental delay. Strategies to prevent congenital and maternal CMV infections have included the use of CMV HIG in pregnant women with primary CMV infection and the development of an effective vaccine program. These preventative strategies have failed to yield substantially positive results in human subjects to date, though there have been some promising developments.
Key Points.
Infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection are at increased risk of developing permanent sequelae, including hearing loss and neurodevelopmental delay.
A reliable biomarker that can predict which infants with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection will develop hearing loss has yet to be identified.
Antiviral therapy with 6 months of oral valganciclovir improves hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection.
Developing an effective vaccine to prevent maternal CMV infection and reduce the incidence of congenital infection is a high priority, but no candidate vaccines are currently near licensure.
Acknowledgments
Financial Support and Sponsorship
This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K08AI108691.
Abbreviations
- CASG
Collaborative Antiviral Study Group
- CHIMES
CMV and Hearing Multicenter Screening Study
- CMV
Cytomegalovirus
- CNS
Central nervous system
- GCV
Ganciclovir
- gB
Glycoprotein B
- HIG
Hyperimmune globulin
- MTCT
Mother-to-child transmission
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- SNHL
Sensorineural hearing loss
- VGCV
Valganciclovir
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
References
- 1.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17(4):253–76. doi: 10.1002/rmv.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, et al. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(1):86–102. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cannon MJ, Schmid DS, Hyde TB. Review of cytomegalovirus seroprevalence and demographic characteristics associated with infection. Rev Med Virol. 2010;20(4):202–13. doi: 10.1002/rmv.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stadler LP, Bernstein DI, Callahan ST, et al. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Infections in Adolescent Females. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2013;2(1):7–14. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boppana SB, Rivera LB, Fowler KB, et al. Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1366–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang C, Zhang X, Bialek S, et al. Attribution of congenital cytomegalovirus infection to primary versus non-primary maternal infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(2):e11–3. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dollard SC, Grosse SD, Ross DS. New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17:355–63. doi: 10.1002/rmv.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boppana SB, Ross SA, Fowler KB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(Suppl 4):S178–81. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, et al. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection in infants born to mothers with preexisting immunity to cytomegalovirus. Pediatrics. 1999;104(1 Pt 1):55–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ross SA, Fowler KB, Ashrith G, et al. Hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection born to mothers with preexisting immunity. J Pediatr. 2006;148(3):332–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening--a silent revolution. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(20):2151–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, et al. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 1997;130(4):624–30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dahle AJ, Fowler KB, Wright JD, et al. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(5):283–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bernard S, Wiener-Vacher S, Van Den Abbeele T, et al. Disorders in Children With Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):e887–95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **15.Kimberlin DW, Jester PM, Sanchez PJ, et al. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(10):933–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404599. Prolonged antiviral therapy for the suppression of viral replication during the first 6 months of life shown to improve hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes out to 2 years of follow up in symptomatic infants. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *16.Forner G, Abate D, Mengoli C, et al. High Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia Predicts CMV Sequelae in Asymptomatic Congenitally Infected Newborns Born to Women With Primary Infection During Pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(1):67–71. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu627. Promising implications for the identification of a biomarker to predict long-term sequelae in asymptomatic infants; further studies warranted. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Sanchez PJ, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143(1):16–25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(03)00192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kimberlin DW, Acosta EP, Sanchez PJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of oral valganciclovir in the treatment of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(6):836–45. doi: 10.1086/528376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosenthal LS, Fowler KB, Boppana SB, et al. Cytomegalovirus shedding and delayed sensorineural hearing loss: results from longitudinal follow-up of children with congenital infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(6):515–20. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318198c724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **20.Ross SA, Ahmed A, Palmer AL, et al. Detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of saliva or urine specimens. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(9):1415–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu263. This study demonstrated the clinical utility of PCR in targeted and large-scale diagnostic screening for CMV infants, thereby improving the feasibility of universal newborn screening. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *21.Cannon MJ, Griffiths PD, Aston V, et al. Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev Med Virol. 2014;24(5):291–307. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1790. An analysis of the estimated burden of disease and potential benefit of available interventions, indicating that universal newborn CMV screening would have a positive impact on a substantial number of children in the United States. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nigro G, Adler SP, La Torre R, et al. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(13):1350–62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *23.Revello MG, Lazzarotto T, Guerra B, et al. A randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1316–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310214. An important study about a potentially useful intervention to prevent congenital CMV infection. No significant differences were found between hyperimmune globulin and control study groups, but larger phase 3 trials are currently enrolling. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stratton KR, Durch JS, Lawrence RS, editors. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Study Priorities for Vaccine Development. Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decision Making. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **25.Schleiss MR, Bierle CJ, Swanson EC, et al. Vaccination with a Live Attenuated Cytomegalovirus Devoid of a Protein Kinase R Inhibitory Gene Results in Reduced Maternal Viremia and Improved Pregnancy Outcome in a Guinea Pig Congenital Infection Model. J Virol. 2015;89(19):9727–38. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01419-15. This paper reports the promising results of an attenuated deletion virus vaccine that proved immunogenic and prevented congenital infection in an animal model. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pass RF, Zhang C, Evans A, et al. Vaccine prevention of maternal cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(12):1191–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Coleman S, Hornig J, Maddux S, et al. Viral Glycoprotein Complex Formation, Essential Function and Immunogenicity in the Guinea Pig Model for Cytomegalovirus. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sijmons S, Thys K, Mbong Ngwese M, et al. High-throughput analysis of human cytomegalovirus genome diversity highlights the widespread occurrence of gene-disrupting mutations and pervasive recombination. J Virol. 2015 May 13; doi: 10.1128/JVI.00578-15. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ross SA, Novak Z, Pati S, et al. Mixed infection and strain diversity in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(7):1003–7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *30.Swanson EC, Gillis P, Hernandez-Alvarado N, et al. Comparison of monovalent glycoprotein B with bivalent gB/pp65 (GP83) vaccine for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a guinea pig model: Inclusion of GP83 reduces gB antibody response but both vaccine approaches provide equivalent protection against pup mortality. Vaccine. 2015;33(32):4013–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.019. While multivalent subunit vaccines are attractive candidates for preventing CMV disease, this study indicates that combination vaccines may be associated with reduced immunogenicity of certain key antigens. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *31.Boppana SB, Britt WJ. Recent approaches and strategies in the generation of antihuman cytomegalovirus vaccines. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1119:311–48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-788-4_17. This excellent review highlights the challenges that remain in the development of an effective CMV vaccine. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]