Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2015 Jul 7;290(34):20734–20742. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.656462

The AlkB Family of Fe(II)/α-Ketoglutarate-dependent Dioxygenases: Repairing Nucleic Acid Alkylation Damage and Beyond*

Bogdan I Fedeles 1,1, Vipender Singh 1,1, James C Delaney 1,2, Deyu Li 1,3,4, John M Essigmann 1,5
PMCID: PMC4543635  PMID: 26152727

Abstract

The AlkB family of Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases is a class of ubiquitous direct reversal DNA repair enzymes that remove alkyl adducts from nucleobases by oxidative dealkylation. The prototypical and homonymous family member is an Escherichia coli “adaptive response” protein that protects the bacterial genome against alkylation damage. AlkB has a wide variety of substrates, including monoalkyl and exocyclic bridged adducts. Nine mammalian AlkB homologs exist (ALKBH1–8, FTO), but only a subset functions as DNA/RNA repair enzymes. This minireview presents an overview of the AlkB proteins including recent data on homologs, structural features, substrate specificities, and experimental strategies for studying DNA repair by AlkB family proteins.

Keywords: alkB, dioxygenase, DNA demethylation, DNA repair, metalloprotein, substrate specificity, RNA demethylation, RNA repair, alkylation damage, direct reversal

AlkB Is an Escherichia coli Fe(II)/αKG-dependent Dioxygenase That Reverses DNA Alkylation Damage

E. coli cells exposed to a low dose of a methylating agent such as methylnitronitrosoguanidine upregulate a transcriptional program that confers significant resistance to subsequent, higher levels of alkylation insult. This phenomenon, discovered in 1977 by Samson and Cairns, was coined the adaptive response (1). At its core, the adaptive response relies on the activity of four proteins: Ada, AlkA, AlkB, and AidB, whose overexpression affords the observed bacterial resistance tothe deleterious effects of alkylating agents (1). Three of the four proteins (Ada, AlkA, and AlkB) are DNA repair proteins that combat the mutagenic and toxic effects of alkylated bases. Although the biological functions of Ada (a methyltransferase) and AlkA (a glycosylase) were established relatively quickly, the function of AlkB remained mysterious until 2001, when Aravind and Koonin, using sequence homology alignments, predicted that AlkB is an Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate (αKG)6-dependent dioxygenase (2). Soon after, AlkB was established as a prototypical oxidative dealkylation DNA repair enzyme (35) that protects the bacterial genome against alkylation damage (610). AlkB uses molecular oxygen to oxidize the alkyl groups on alkylation-damaged nucleic acid bases, such as 1-methyl-adenine (m1A), 3-methylcytosine (m3C) (7, 8), and 1,N6-ethenoadenine (ϵA) (9, 11); the oxidized alkyl groups are subsequently released as aldehydes, regenerating the undamaged bases (Fig. 1). The decade of research that followed the 2002 discovery of the enzymatic properties of AlkB (7, 8) greatly expanded our understanding of the biological functions of the AlkB dioxygenases. This minireview summarizes the most salient aspects of this research.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Examples of oxidative dealkylation reactions (m3C, ϵA, and m6A) catalyzed by AlkB family dioxygenases and their proposed mechanisms. HO-m3C is 3-hydroxymethylcytosine, and HO-m6A is N6-hydroxymethyladenine.

Bacterial Homologs of the E. coli AlkB

The E. coli AlkB protein is by far the best studied enzyme in the family. However, AlkB homologs exist in most bacteria and almost all eukaryotes. Speaking to the remarkable versatility and ubiquity of the AlkB proteins, even certain single-stranded plant-infecting RNA viruses (e.g. Flexiviridae (now classified as Alphaflexiviridae, Betaflexiviridae, and Gammaflexiviridae)) encode an AlkB homolog that can repair alkylated bases in DNA and, preferably, RNA (12).

The majority of aerobic bacterial species express AlkB proteins, which show a great diversity of substrate specificity (4, 13, 14). Given the AlkB requirement for molecular oxygen, obligate anaerobic bacteria (e.g. Clostridium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium) do not appear to have AlkB type proteins (4, 14). A careful bioinformatics analysis of the homologous sequences found four phylogenetic groups of bacterial AlkB proteins denoted 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B (14). Group 1A proteins, which include the E. coli AlkB, are characterized by robust oxidative dealkylation activities and broad substrate specificities. This group includes the Streptomyces AlkB proteins, which share 79% sequence identity with the E. coli AlkB and have been shown to repair both methylated and etheno lesions (14). Group 1B proteins, primarily found in the β and γ subdivisions of Proteobacteria and in cyanobacteria, also show wide substrate preferences. They are most closely related to the eukaryotic ALKBH2 and ALKBH3 homologs. Group 2A proteins, often found in the α Proteobacteria (e.g. Agrobacterium, Rickettsia, and Rhizobium), share strong homology with the ALKBH8 proteins from animals and plants, which have been implicated in tRNA post-transcriptional modification rather than true DNA or RNA repair. Finally, group 2B proteins, often found in soil bacteria (e.g. Actinobacteria) but also in Xanthomonas and Burkholderia, are most likely to show substrate specialization; some enzymes have high activity on monoalkyl lesion, but no activity on bridged adducts (e.g. MT-2B from Mycobacterium tuberculosis), whereas others are exactly the opposite (e.g. XC-2B from Xanthomonas campestris) (14). Such specialization presumably reflects an adaptation to a specific environmental stressor. Additionally, unlike E. coli, many bacterial genomes contain two or even three AlkB family proteins (14). So far, no AlkB homologs have been found in Archaea (14).

Eukaryotic and Mammalian AlkB Homologs

Most eukaryotic cells have several AlkB homologs, with the notable exception of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which lacks this class of DNA repair enzymes. Mammalian cells have nine homologs (2, 4, 15); the first eight have been denoted ALKBH1–8, whereas the ninth is known as FTO (fat mass and obesity-associated) (16). Evolutionarily speaking, ALKBH5 and FTO are the newest AlkB proteins, being found only in vertebrates (17, 18). The other seven AlkB homologs are conserved across all metazoans, including worms and fruit flies (13).

Among the nine human AlkB homologs, ALKBH2 (1925) and ALKBH3 (2529) are bona fide nuclear DNA repair enzymes, being the only homologs that can complement the function of E. coli AlkB in vivo (25, 30) and protect cells against alkylation damage both in cell culture and in animal models (22, 28, 30). ALKBH1, featuring the highest sequence homology to E. coli AlkB, can function as a mitochondrial nucleic acid demethylase (31) but also exhibits apyrimidinic/apurinic lyase activity (3234). The lyase activity has also been observed in Abh1, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog, which, however, has no demethylase activity (35). Additionally, ALKBH1 can also demethylate H2A histone (36), an activity more consistent with the impaired development phenotype of the ALKBH1 KO mice (37, 38).

The remaining homologs have no known activity on DNA substrates; instead, they demethylate RNA or proteins. Both FTO (3941), whose overexpression is closely linked to obesity and diabetes (16, 42, 43), and ALKBH5 (4448) repair primarily N6-methyladenine (m6A) in RNA (Fig. 1). FTO also repairs 3-methylthymine (m3T) and 3-methyluracil (m3U) in ssDNA (49). ALKBH8 (5054) is involved in the maturation of tRNA featuring both an S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyl-transferase domain that methylates 5-carboxymethyluridine (cm5U) to 5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine (mcm5U), and a dioxygenase domain that hydroxylates mcm5U to generate (S)-5-methoxycarbonylhydroxymethyluridine (mchm5U), a common functional modification at the wobble position of tRNA (51, 52). The main function of ALKBH4 seems to be actin demethylation (55, 56). ALKBH7, which plays a role in alkylation-induced necrosis (5759), is believed to act on protein substrates, but their identity is not currently known. Finally, the function and substrates of ALKBH6 remain to be established. Although they are also members of the Fe(II)/αKG dioxygenase superfamily, the mammalian TET (ten-eleven translocation) proteins, which play an important role in the epigenetic reprogramming of the cell (60), are only distantly related to the AlkB proteins, and they will be covered in other minireviews.

Structural Features of the AlkB Dioxygenases

Crystal structures of the E. coli AlkB (6164) and the human homologs ALKBH2 (62), ALKBH3 (29), ALKBH5 (48), ALKBH7 (59), ALKBH8 (53), and FTO (66) have provided significant insight into the molecular mechanism of the oxidative dealkylation catalyzed by AlkB dioxygenases. The active site of these enzymes is contained on a characteristic double-stranded β-helix domain, also known as a “jelly-roll” fold, consisting of eight β-strands arranged in pairs in a helical conformation to form the core that binds the Fe(II) and αKG cofactors using conserved residues (61, 62) (Fig. 2A). The E. coli AlkB also contains a unique 90-residue N-terminal subdomain that interacts with the oligonucleotide substrate containing the damaged base and covers the active site by forming a “nucleotide recognition lid.” Being conformationally flexible, this lid can accommodate substrates of variable sizes, which can explain the diverse substrate specificity of the enzyme (see below). However, recent data on bacterial AlkB homologs suggest that this domain is not the only factor governing the substrate specificity (67). The active site of AlkB contains a 3 Å-wide oxygen diffusion tunnel from the protein surface to the oxygen binding site (61). His-131, Asp-133, and His-187 of E. coli AlkB, together with molecular oxygen (or water under anaerobic conditions) and αKG bound in a bidentate fashion, form the octahedral primary coordination sphere around the non-heme iron (Fig. 2, B–D). The αKG cofactor is held in place by two salt bridge interactions between the Arg-204, Arg-210, and the carboxylates of αKG (61, 63). The octahedral coordination and the global geometry are conserved in AlkB complexes in which Fe(II) is replaced with Co(II) or Mn(II), but such replacement results in closure of the oxygen diffusion tunnel, producing an oxygen-resistant phenotype (63).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Structural aspects of E. coli AlkB protein. A, crystal structure (Protein Data Bank (PDB) 3O1P) of E. coli AlkB, featuring the jelly-roll fold, with the m1A substrate flipped out of the DNA duplex into the active site of the enzyme. The orange sphere denotes the position of the central metal ion (here Mn(II)). B, active site of E. coli AlkB showing the octahedral coordination around the central metal ion and the relative position of the substrates m1A and ϵA, shown overlaid. The red sphere denotes a water molecule crystalized at the molecular oxygen binding site. C and D, the ethenoguanine lesions 1,N2-ϵG and N2,3-ϵG modeled in the E. coli AlkB active site (PDB 3O1P) showing the distances between the iron-oxo moiety (red sphere of the left side of each central Fe(II)) and the exocyclic bridge carbons). (Reproduced with permission from Chang et al. (87).

The Mechanism of AlkB-catalyzed Dealkylation

Similar to other non-heme iron dioxygenases, the AlkB-catalyzed oxidative dealkylation reaction is initiated by the binding of molecular oxygen to Fe(II) in the active site by replacing the bound water molecule (6875). Cleavage of molecular oxygen generates an Fe(IV)-oxo reactive moiety, whereas the αKG ligand is oxidatively decarboxylated to succinate. Once CO2 is released from the active site, the reactive Fe(IV)-oxo ligand migrates adjacent to the target alkyl group on the nucleobase substrate and hydroxylates the alkyl moiety (7275). The resulting carbinoliminium is typically unstable and dissociates (in a spontaneous or catalyzed fashion) into an aldehyde product and the unmodified (repaired) base.

For simple alkyl substrates, AlkB oxidizes the carbon attached to a nucleobase nitrogen atom (i.e. ring nitrogen or exocyclic amine). The resulting carbinoliminium species (e.g. 3-hydroxymethylcytosine from m3C (Fig. 1), or 1-hydroxy-methyladenine from m1A) have been experimentally observed in AlkB oxidation reactions performed in crystallo (64). Specifically, the AlkB-substrate complex, together with Fe(II) and αKG, is first crystalized under anaerobic conditions. The reaction is then initiated by exposing the crystals to air (64).

In the case of etheno lesions (e.g. ϵA), the AlkB dealkylation was proposed to involve the oxidation of the etheno bridge to an epoxide, followed by hydrolysis of the epoxide to a glycol and subsequent release of the dialdehyde glyoxal (Fig. 1) (9, 11). The glycol corresponding to ϵA has been experimentally observed in crystallo (64). The epoxide formation, however, has been recently challenged in a computational study, which suggested instead that the AlkB reaction with ϵA proceeds via a zwitterion intermediate (76). Nevertheless, further experimental work is needed to establish the identity of the reaction intermediate.

The binding affinity of E. coli AlkB to damaged DNA is influenced by both the damaged base and the backbone phosphates of the substrate (61). Residues Thr-51, Tyr-76, and Arg-161, conserved across all eubacterial AlkB homologs, form extensive hydrogen-bonding interactions with the backbone phosphates (29, 61, 62). In the AlkB repair complex, the central alkylated base is splayed out of the DNA helix; the stacking interactions between the normal flanking bases stabilize the resulting backbone conformation. The flipped-out alkylated base is sandwiched between AlkB conserved residues Trp-69 and His-131, whereas the DNA backbone is distorted such that the bases flanking the flipped damaged base stack with each other (62).

Unlike E. coli AlkB, ALKBH2 promotes the flipping of the damaged base by using an aromatic finger residue, Phe-102, which intercalates into the duplex DNA and fills the gap left by the flipped base (62). Moreover, although AlkB only interacts with the lesion strand, ALKBH2 interacts with both DNA strands, which may explain the observed differences in substrate preference: ALKBH2 prefers dsDNA, whereas E. coli AlkB prefers ssDNA or RNA (61, 62).

Substrate Specificity of AlkB Dioxygenases

In addition to the originally reported AlkB substrates, m1A and m3C, a wide variety of modified bases are substrates for the AlkB family proteins, including monoalkylated bases with alkyl moieties of various sizes (Table 1) and bases featuring exocyclic bridged adducts (Table 2). Additionally, AlkB proteins can process both single-stranded and double-stranded substrates, and in both DNA and RNA.

TABLE 1.

Chemical structures of the monoalkyl substrates processed by AlkB dioxygenases

The repair target within each base is highlighted in red. The lesion phenotype in AlkB-deficient E. coli cells is provided in terms of % relative bypass (RB) and % mutagenesis, as determined by the CRAB and REAP assays. Bypass efficiencies are reported as a percentage relative to the unmodified DNA base at the lesion site.

graphic file with name zbc038152415t001.jpg

a Very strong replication block (RB<10%), strong replication block (RB 10–50%), mild replication block (RB 50–90%), not a replication block (RB>90%).

b Not mutagenic (<2%), slightly mutagenic (2–10%), mutagenic (10–50%), very mutagenic (>50%).

c AlkB notation refers to the E. coli protein.

d Nidhi Shrivastav, personal communication.

e Bogdan I. Fedeles, personal communication.

TABLE 2.

Chemical structures of the exocyclic bridged substrates of AlkB dioxygenases

The repair target within each base is highlighted in red. The lesion phenotype in AlkB-deficient E. coli cells is provided in terms of % relative bypass (RB) and % mutagenesis, as determined by the CRAB and REAP assays. Bypass efficiencies are reported as a percentage relative to the unmodified DNA base at the lesion site. All lesions are in DNA.

graphic file with name zbc038152415t002.jpg

a Very strong replication block (RB<10%), strong replication block (RB 10–50%), mild replication block (RB 50–90%), not a replication block (RB>90%).

b Not mutagenic (<2%), slightly mutagenic (2–10%), mutagenic (10–50%), very mutagenic (>50%).

c AlkB notation refers to the E. coli protein.

d James C. Delaney, personal communication.

Monoalkyl DNA Lesions

Recent studies have highlighted that at least in vitro, E. coli AlkB is able to repair all seven N-methyl adducts occurring at the Watson-Crick base pairing interface of the four DNA bases, specifically m1A, m6A, 1-methylguanine (m1G), N2-methyl-guanine (m2G), m3C, N4-methylcytosine (m4C), and m3T (Table 1) (7780). These findings emphasize the important role of AlkB (and by analogy, the AlkB family enzymes) as a versatile preserver of genomic integrity under alkylation stress (80). Nevertheless, not all alkylated DNA bases are substrates for AlkB repair. N-Alkylated 3-methyladenine (m3A) (25), O-alkylated O6-methylguanine (O6mG) (79), and C-alkylated 5-methylcytosine (m5C) are not processed by AlkB (79). Instead, m3A is a substrate for glycosylases, O6mG is repaired by O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferases and m5C is oxidized by the TET enzymes.

Interestingly, the ability of AlkB to demethylate exocyclic DNA adducts such as m4C and m6A suggests a potential additional biological function for AlkB, besides DNA repair. Often, the m4C and m6A modifications are not deleterious, but rather physiological post-replicative DNA markers that control strand discrimination, replication initiation, and even gene expression in certain bacteria (81, 82). Furthermore, the demonstrated chemical competence of E. coli AlkB to oxidize a wide range of substrates has anticipated the putative substrate specificity of other AlkB homologs (e.g. m6A in RNA is now considered the canonical substrate for ALKBH5 and FTO), including functional roles beyond DNA repair.

Although most widely appreciated as a demethylating enzyme, E. coli AlkB also repairs higher order alkyl adducts. Ethylated bases such as 1-ethyladenine (e1A), N2-ethylguanine (e2G), 3-ethylcytosine (e3C), and 3-ethylthymine (e3T) are known substrates for AlkB family proteins (25, 77, 80). Among N2-substituted alkylguanines, the bulky furfuryl (FF) and tetrahydrofurfuryl (HF) lesions can also be removed by E. coli AlkB (80).

The efficiency with which AlkB enzymes process different N-alkyl nucleobases varies considerably, depending on both the identity of the base and the position of the alkyl group on the base. For the E. coli AlkB, m1A is a better substrate than m6A (these damaged bases are regio-isomers) (83); similarly, m3C is a better substrate than m4C (80). When comparing two different bases alkylated at the same position, m1A is a better AlkB substrate than m1G both in vivo and in vitro (77, 79). Generally, alkylated adenines and cytosines are repaired more efficiently than alkylated guanines and thymines; alkyl groups on the ring nitrogens are removed more efficiently than alkyl groups on the exocyclic amines.

The preference of the AlkB enzymes toward m1A and m3C may reflect the fact that these lesions are positively charged under physiological pH, which is believed to help with the AlkB recognition and binding to the damaged bases, and may also allow a faster release of formaldehyde from the carbinoliminium intermediates (84). Additionally, a stabilizing hydrogen-bonding interaction exists between the AlkB invariant residue Asp-135 and the 6-amino or 4-amino group of adenine or cytosine, respectively (61, 63, 84). For neutral lesions, such as m1G and m3T that contain hydrogen bond acceptors at the equivalent position, the interaction is weaker, being mediated through water molecules; this may account for the less efficient repair of m1G and m3T relative to m1A and m3C.

One notable peculiar feature of the E. coli AlkB is its ability to repair equally well the top two substrates, m1A and m3C, despite the large size difference between them. Biochemical and structural studies have shown that AlkB achieves its diverse substrate specificity by tailoring its kcat and Km values for various substrates (63). For example, AlkB has a significantly higher kcat and Km for m3C when compared with m1A. Thus, AlkB maintains a similar net catalytic activity (kcat/Km) by increasing the turnover rate of the substrate with lower affinity. Co-crystals of AlkB with both substrates suggest a correlation between the kcat and Km compensation and the atomic packing density in the active site (i.e. the extent to which the substrate fills the volume of the active site). Smaller substrates such as m3C have a lower atomic packing density, which seems to promote a faster rate (kcat) at the expense of a weaker binding (higher Km) (63). The mechanistic basis for this relationship is not fully understood, but it is suspected that the stereochemical properties of the substrate directly influence (via quantum mechanical effects) the rate with which the electrons or atoms rearrange during the course of the reaction (63).

Monoalkyl RNA Lesions

E. coli AlkB and human ALKBH1 and ALKBH3 can oxidize and remove the methyl group of m1A, m3C, and m1G in RNA substrates (15, 30, 85). The bacterial AlkB protein XC-1B can also repair RNA substrates (14). The ability of these proteins to work on RNA correlates with their preference to repair ssDNA over dsDNA. Both AlkB and ALKBH3 can function as RNA repair enzymes in the cell (86). In fact, the primary function of ALKBH3 is speculated to be RNA repair, argued by its equal activity on RNA and ssDNA and its diffuse cellular localization (cytosol and nucleus) (30, 85).

Other AlkB homologs, such as ALKBH5, FTO, and ALKBH8, have been shown to work exclusively on RNA substrates. Both ALKBH5 and FTO remove the methyl group from m6A in RNA (Fig. 1) (41, 47). However, these oxidation/demethylation reactions likely constitute an additional layer of mRNA regulation (ALKBH5 and FTO) or post-transcriptional tRNA modification (ALKBH8), and thus not true repair mechanisms for alkylation-damaged RNA.

Exocyclic Bridge-containing Lesions

Of all the four possible etheno adducts of DNA nucleobases, ϵA (9, 11, 67), 3,N4-ethenocytosine (ϵC) (9, 67), and 1,N2-ethenoguanine (1,N2-ϵG) (67, 87) are substrates for AlkB dioxygenases, whereas N2,3-ethenoguanine (N2,3-ϵG) is not (Table 2) (87). Although the ability of E. coli AlkB to efficiently dealkylate ϵA and ϵC both in vitro (9, 11) and in vivo (9) in ssDNA was known since 2005, the AlkB activity on 1,N2-ϵG was reported only recently. Although one study concluded that E. coli AlkB does not efficiently process 1,N2-ϵG in vitro (67), a higher resolution MS method revealed that 1,N2-ϵG is a substrate (albeit a modest one) for E. coli AlkB both in vitro and in vivo (87). The inability of E. coli AlkB to process the remaining etheno lesion, N2,3-ϵG, can be explained structurally; in the active site of the protein, the etheno bridge is spatially too far away from the iron-oxo center (Fig. 2, C and D) (87).

The etheno lesions are excellent substrates for many members of the AlkB family. The bacterial AlkB proteins RE-2A (Rhizobium etli), SA-2B (Streptomyces avermitilis), and XC-2B can repair ϵA, ϵC, and 1,N2-ϵG, both in ssDNA and in dsDNA substrates (67). In fact, RE-2A and XC-2B are specialized AlkB proteins that remove only etheno lesions (67), but do not process monoalkyl substrates (14). Similarly, the human homolog ALKBH2 removes all the three etheno lesions in dsDNA, but only ϵA and ϵC in ssDNA, where the repair is less efficient (67). By contrast, some AlkB proteins are more specialized. The bacterial proteins SA-1A and XC-1B remove only ϵA and ϵC, but are inactive on 1,N2-ϵG, whereas SC-1A (Streptomyces coelicolor) works only on ϵA in dsDNA (67). Similarly, the human homolog ALKBH3 seems to repair only ϵC, and only in ssDNA (67). Finally, not all AlkB proteins can repair etheno adducts; MT-2B and SC-2B do not process etheno adducts, yet they do repair monoalkylated bases (14, 67).

Other exocyclic bridged lesions can also be processed by AlkB dioxygenases (Table 2), but in most cases, the substrate is processed initially as a monoalkyl lesion. After the initial oxidation, the exocyclic bridge can open, forming another monoalkyl lesion that either can fall apart spontaneously or is further oxidized by AlkB. For example, 1,N6-ethanoadenine (EA), the saturated analog of ϵA, is completely repaired by E. coli AlkB, with the reaction involving two successive oxidation steps at the carbons on the N1 and N6 positions of adenine (83, 88). Similarly, 3,N4-α-hydroxyethanocytosine (the hydrated version of ϵC) and the three-carbon bridge analog 3,N4-α-hydroxypropanocytosine are also good AlkB substrates, but require only one oxidation at the carbon attached to the N3 of cytosine (10, 84). Additionally, three propano-exocyclic lesions of guanine (α-hydroxypropanoguanine (αHOPG), γ-hydroxypropanoguanine (γHOPG), and malondialdehydeguanine (M1G)) are also processed by E. coli AlkB in vitro, but the oxidation steps are thought to occur primarily on the open ring forms of the lesions (89).

Studying DNA Repair by AlkB Family Dioxygenases

In Vitro Strategies

Most in vitro strategies require expressing and purifying the AlkB protein of interest, which is then incubated directly with single- or double-stranded substrates, typically DNA or RNA oligonucleotides containing chemically defined modified bases (lesions). Phosphoramidites for many common modified bases are commercially available, which allows for a straightforward preparation of AlkB substrates by using a DNA/RNA synthesizer. Careful purification and characterization (by LC-MS) of such oligonucleotide substrates are essential because the modified bases are often unstable.

Two general methods are commonly used to analyze the outcome of AlkB reactions. The most sensitive method relies on high resolution MS to identify the reaction products and intermediates by their specific masses. Because this method may detect relatively stable reaction intermediates, it often provides insight into the mechanism of more complex AlkB reactions (83, 89). The main caveats of this method are the low throughput (each reaction needs a dedicated HPLC-MS run) and the cost (MS equipment is expensive). The second method can be utilized when the lesion under analysis is either a block for a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (e.g. DpnII) or a good substrate for a glycosylase. After the AlkB reaction, the glycosylase would generate an abasic site if the lesion is still present, but would leave the DNA intact if the canonical base has been restored by direct reversal (67). Following chemical or enzymatic cleavage at the abasic site, a simple PAGE experiment would distinguish between the repaired (uncut) and unrepaired (cut) oligonucleotides (67). When using a modification-sensitive restriction enzyme, which only cuts a canonical sequence, the digested product (cut) would signify repair, whereas the undigested product (uncut) is unrepaired (14). The key advantage of these approaches is speed; the efficiency of repair of one or more lesions with an entire panel of purified AlkB enzymes can be analyzed in one run, in parallel (14, 67). The caveat of the method is the requirement of an efficient and specific glycosylase for every lesion studied, or a suitable restriction endonuclease that is inhibited by the studied lesion. Additionally, this method detects only the fully repaired canonical base product of the AlkB reaction, and thus, provides no information regarding the reaction intermediates.

In Vivo Strategies

Genetic strategies have been used to establish the importance of AlkB in protecting cells against alkylation damage, long before the Fe(II)/αKG-dependent mechanism was known (6). Later, such genetic approaches were combined with biochemical tools to evaluate the repair efficiency of AlkB on many chemically defined DNA lesions. Specifically, an M13 single-stranded viral vector is engineered to contain site-specifically a modified base and allowed to replicate in isogenic AlkB+ and AlkB cell lines. Two metrics are calculated by analyzing the resulting viral progeny: 1) lesion bypass, the ability of the lesion to block viral replication, when compared with a normal base, evaluated with the CRAB assay (90); and 2) mutagenesis, the ability of the lesion to generate mutations at that site, evaluated with the REAP assay (77, 90). Any significant positive change in these metrics between the AlkB and AlkB+ strains (i.e. improvement in bypass, or decrease in mutagenesis) indicates that AlkB contributes to the repair of the studied lesion. When compared with the in vitro strategies, this method allows evaluation of the AlkB repair efficiency in a cellular context, where both the enzyme and the putative substrates are present at physiologically relevant concentrations. As a caveat, this approach will not work if the lesion studied does not produce a phenotype measurable by the two metrics above. For example, m2G is neither a block to replication nor mutagenic; therefore the ability of AlkB to repair this lesion in vivo cannot be discerned with this method (91). So far, the in vivo genetics strategy has been successfully used in E. coli cells to establish that m1A, m3C, e3C, m1G, m3T (77), ϵA, ϵC (9), EA (88), and 1,N2-ϵG (87) are substrates for AlkB repair in vivo, while at the same time establishing that N2,3-ϵG is not an AlkB substrate (87).

Future Directions and Perspective

As the body of knowledge regarding the specific cellular functions of the AlkB family dioxygenases expands, and the complete list of substrates for each enzyme, particularly for the human homologs, becomes known, the field will be poised to explore in more depth the regulation of AlkB proteins. From the point of view of DNA repair, two directions merit attention. First, as gatekeepers of genomic integrity, certain AlkB homologs may function as tumor suppressor genes (92). When their activity is impaired, excessive DNA alkylation damage may accumulate, which can lead to mutations and malignant transformation or cell death (93, 94). Understanding the biochemical mechanisms by which AlkB enzymes are rendered inoperative may help connect environmental or endogenous factors to mutagenesis and cancer. Molecules that compete for binding with αKG (e.g. the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate) or metal ions that compete with the required Fe(II) (e.g. Ni(II)) have already been shown to inhibit the activity of certain Fe(II)/αKG-dependent dioxygenases (95, 96). However, the relevance of these mechanisms of inhibition to the AlkB family of enzymes has not been fully evaluated.

Second, from an opposite perspective, AlkB family proteins may also be key factors that help tumor cells withstand chemotherapy and promote tumor cell growth (24, 26, 27). Here, the development of potent and specific inhibitors of Fe(II)/αKG-dependent dioxygenases becomes an important challenge (65, 97). By using the structural and mechanistic information available, the development of anti-cancer agents or adjuvants that target AlkB homologs is certainly within reach.

The last decade of research on the AlkB family dioxygenases has been filled with unexpected findings that have propelled the field in leaps and bounds. One can only wonder about the still-to-be-discovered surprises this family of enzymes has to offer for the decades to come.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants P01 CA26731, R37 CA080024, and P30 ES002109 (to J. M. E.). This is the fourth article in the Thematic Minireview series “Metals in Biology: α-Ketoglutarate/Iron-dependent Dioxygenases.” The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

6
The abbreviations used are:
αKG
α-ketoglutarate
m1A
1-methyladenine
m3C
3-methylcytosine
m3T
3-methylthymine
m6A
N6-methyladenine
mcm5U
5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine
m1G
1-methylguanine
m4C
N4-methylcytosine
m2G
N2-methylguanine
m3A
3-methyladenine
m5C
5-methylcytosine
e3C
3-ethylcytosine
ϵA
1,N6-ethenoadenine
ϵC
3,N4-ethenocytosine
1,N2-ϵG
1,N2-ethenoguanine
N2,3-ϵG
N2,3-ethenoguanine
FTO
fat mass- and obesity-associated
EA
1,N6-ethanoadenine
CRAB
competitive replication of adduct bypass
REAP
restriction endonuclease and post-labeling analysis of mutation frequency
RB
relative bypass
HOPG
hydroxypropanoguanine.

References

  • 1. Samson L., Cairns J. (1977) A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Nature 267, 281–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Aravind L., Koonin E. V. (2001) The DNA-repair protein AlkB, EGL-9, and leprecan define new families of 2-oxoglutarate- and iron-dependent dioxygenases. Genome Biol. 2, RESEARCH0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sedgwick B. (2004) Repairing DNA-methylation damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 148–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sedgwick B., Bates P. A., Paik J., Jacobs S. C., Lindahl T. (2007) Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 429–442, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shen L., Song C.-X., He C., Zhang Y. (2014) Mechanism and function of oxidative reversal of DNA and RNA methylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 585–614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chen B. J., Carroll P., Samson L. (1994) The Escherichia coli AlkB protein protects human cells against alkylation-induced toxicity. J. Bacteriol. 176, 6255–6261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Trewick S. C., Henshaw T. F., Hausinger R. P., Lindahl T., Sedgwick B. (2002) Oxidative demethylation by Escherichia coli AlkB directly reverts DNA base damage. Nature 419, 174–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Falnes P. Ø., Johansen R. F., Seeberg E. (2002) AlkB-mediated oxidative demethylation reverses DNA damage in Escherichia coli. Nature 419, 178–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Delaney J. C., Smeester L., Wong C., Frick L. E., Taghizadeh K., Wishnok J. S., Drennan C. L., Samson L. D., Essigmann J. M. (2005) AlkB reverses etheno DNA lesions caused by lipid oxidation in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 855–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Maciejewska A. M., Ruszel K. P., Nieminuszczy J., Lewicka J., Sokołowska B., Grzesiuk E., Kuśmierek J. T. (2010) Chloroacetaldehyde-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: the role of AlkB protein in repair of 3,N4-ethenocytosine and 3,N4-α-hydroxyethanocytosine. Mutat. Res. 684, 24–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mishina Y., Yang C.-G., He C. (2005) Direct repair of the exocyclic DNA adduct 1,N6-ethenoadenine by the DNA repair AlkB proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14594–14595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. van den Born E., Omelchenko M. V., Bekkelund A., Leihne V., Koonin E. V., Dolja V. V., Falnes P. Ø. (2008) Viral AlkB proteins repair RNA damage by oxidative demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 5451–5461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Drabløs F., Feyzi E., Aas P. A., Vaagbø C. B., Kavli B., Bratlie M. S., Peña-Diaz J., Otterlei M., Slupphaug G., Krokan H. E. (2004) Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA: repair mechanisms and medical significance. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3, 1389–1407, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. van den Born E., Bekkelund A., Moen M. N., Omelchenko M. V., Klungland A., Falnes P. Ø. (2009) Bioinformatics and functional analysis define four distinct groups of AlkB DNA-dioxygenases in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 7124–7136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yi C., He C. (2013) DNA repair by reversal of DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu C., Mou S., Cai Y. (2013) FTO gene variant and risk of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 8, e82133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Falnes P. Ø., Klungland A., Alseth I. (2007) Repair of methyl lesions in DNA and RNA by oxidative demethylation. Neuroscience 145, 1222–1232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Robbens S., Rouzé P., Cock J. M., Spring J., Worden A. Z., Van de Peer Y. (2008) The FTO gene, implicated in human obesity, is found only in vertebrates and marine algae. J. Mol. Evol. 66, 80–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Li P., Gao S., Wang L., Yu F., Li J., Wang C., Li J., Wong J. (2013) ABH2 couples regulation of ribosomal DNA transcription with DNA alkylation repair. Cell Rep. 4, 817–829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhu C., Yi C. (2014) Switching demethylation activities between AlkB family RNA/DNA demethylases through exchange of active-site residues. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 3659–3662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chen B., Liu H., Sun X., Yang C.-G. (2010) Mechanistic insight into the recognition of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates by ABH2 and ABH3. Mol. Biosyst. 6, 2143–2149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fu D., Samson L. D. (2012) Direct repair of 3,N4-ethenocytosine by the human ALKBH2 dioxygenase is blocked by the AAG/MPG glycosylase. DNA Repair (Amst.) 11, 46–52, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nay S. L., Lee D.-H., Bates S. E., O'Connor T. R. (2012) Alkbh2 protects against lethality and mutation in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts. DNA Repair (Amst.) 11, 502–510, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cetica V., Genitori L., Giunti L., Sanzo M., Bernini G., Massimino M., Sardi I. (2009) Pediatric brain tumors: mutations of two dioxygenases (hABH2 and hABH3) that directly repair alkylation damage. J. Neurooncol. 94, 195–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Duncan T., Trewick S. C., Koivisto P., Bates P. A., Lindahl T., Sedgwick B. (2002) Reversal of DNA alkylation damage by two human dioxygenases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 16660–16665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dango S., Mosammaparast N., Sowa M. E., Xiong L.-J., Wu F., Park K., Rubin M., Gygi S., Harper J. W., Shi Y. (2011) DNA unwinding by ASCC3 helicase is coupled to ALKBH3-dependent DNA alkylation repair and cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cell 44, 373–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Koike K., Ueda Y., Hase H., Kitae K., Fusamae Y., Masai S., Inagaki T., Saigo Y., Hirasawa S., Nakajima K., Ohshio I., Makino Y., Konishi N., Yamamoto H., Tsujikawa K. (2012) Anti-tumor effect of AlkB homolog 3 knockdown in hormone-independent prostate cancer cells. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 12, 847–856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Calvo J. A., Meira L. B., Lee C.-Y. I., Moroski-Erkul C. A., Abolhassani N., Taghizadeh K., Eichinger L. W., Muthupalani S., Nordstrand L. M., Klungland A., Samson L. D. (2012) DNA repair is indispensable for survival after acute inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2680–2689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sundheim O., Vågbø C. B., Bjørås M., Sousa M. M. L., Talstad V., Aas P. A., Drabløs F., Krokan H. E., Tainer J. A., Slupphaug G. (2006) Human ABH3 structure and key residues for oxidative demethylation to reverse DNA/RNA damage. EMBO J. 25, 3389–3397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Aas P. A., Otterlei M., Falnes P. O., Vågbø C. B., Skorpen F., Akbari M., Sundheim O., Bjørås M., Slupphaug G., Seeberg E., Krokan H. E. (2003) Human and bacterial oxidative demethylases repair alkylation damage in both RNA and DNA. Nature 421, 859–863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Westbye M. P., Feyzi E., Aas P. A., Vågbø C. B., Talstad V. A., Kavli B., Hagen L., Sundheim O., Akbari M., Liabakk N.-B., Slupphaug G., Otterlei M., Krokan H. E. (2008) Human AlkB homolog 1 is a mitochondrial protein that demethylates 3-methylcytosine in DNA and RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 25046–25056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Müller T. A., Andrzejak M. M., Hausinger R. P. (2013) A covalent protein-DNA 5′-product adduct is generated following AP lyase activity of human ALKBH1 (AlkB homologue 1). Biochem. J. 452, 509–518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Müller T. A., Yu K., Hausinger R. P., Meek K. (2013) ALKBH1 is dispensable for abasic site cleavage during base excision repair and class switch recombination. PLoS One 8, e67403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Silvestrov P., Müller T. A., Clark K. N., Hausinger R. P., Cisneros G. A. (2014) Homology modeling, molecular dynamics, and site-directed mutagenesis study of AlkB human homolog 1 (ALKBH1). J. Mol. Graph. Model. 54, 123–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Korvald H., Falnes P. Ø., Laerdahl J. K., Bjørås M., Alseth I. (2012) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe AlkB homolog Abh1 exhibits AP lyase activity but no demethylase activity. DNA Repair (Amst.) 11, 453–462, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ougland R., Lando D., Jonson I., Dahl J. A., Moen M. N., Nordstrand L. M., Rognes T., Lee J. T., Klungland A., Kouzarides T., Larsen E. (2012) ALKBH1 is a histone H2A dioxygenase involved in neural differentiation. Stem Cells 30, 2672–2682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pan Z., Sikandar S., Witherspoon M., Dizon D., Nguyen T., Benirschke K., Wiley C., Vrana P., Lipkin S. M. (2008) Impaired placental trophoblast lineage differentiation in Alkbh1−/− mice. Dev. Dyn. 237, 316–327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nordstrand L. M., Svärd J., Larsen E., Nilsen A., Ougland R., Furu K., Lien G. F., Rognes T., Namekawa S. H., Lee J. T., Klungland A. (2010) Mice lacking Alkbh1 display sex-ratio distortion and unilateral eye defects. PLoS One 5, e13827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Meyer K. D., Jaffrey S. R. (2014) The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 313–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Chandola U., Das R., Panda B. (2015) Role of the N6-methyladenosine RNA mark in gene regulation and its implications on development and disease. Brief Funct. Genomics 14, 169–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jia G., Fu Y., Zhao X., Dai Q., Zheng G., Yang Y., Yi C., Lindahl T., Pan T., Yang Y.-G., He C. (2011) N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 885–887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhao X., Yang Y., Sun B.-F., Zhao Y.-L., Yang Y.-G. (2014) FTO and obesity: mechanisms of association. Curr. Diab. Rep. 14, 486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Church C., Moir L., McMurray F., Girard C., Banks G. T., Teboul L., Wells S., Brüning J. C., Nolan P. M., Ashcroft F. M., Cox R. D. (2010) Overexpression of Fto leads to increased food intake and results in obesity. Nat. Genet. 42, 1086–1092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xu C., Liu K., Tempel W., Demetriades M., Aik W., Schofield C. J., Min J. (2014) Structures of human ALKBH5 demethylase reveal a unique binding mode for specific single-stranded N6-methyladenosine RNA demethylation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 17299–17311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Shen F., Huang W., Huang J.-T., Xiong J., Yang Y., Wu K., Jia G.-F., Chen J., Feng Y.-Q., Yuan B.-F., Liu S.-M. (2015) Decreased N6-methyladenosine in peripheral blood RNA from diabetic patients is associated with FTO expression rather than ALKBH5. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100, E148–154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Thalhammer A., Bencokova Z., Poole R., Loenarz C., Adam J., O'Flaherty L., Schödel J., Mole D., Giaslakiotis K., Schofield C. J., Hammond E. M., Ratcliffe P. J., Pollard P. J. (2011) Human AlkB homologue 5 is a nuclear 2-oxoglutarate dependent oxygenase and a direct target of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α). PLoS One 6, e16210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zheng G., Dahl J. A., Niu Y., Fedorcsak P., Huang C.-M., Li C. J., Vågbø C. B., Shi Y., Wang W.-L., Song S.-H., Lu Z., Bosmans R. P. G., Dai Q., Hao Y.-J., Yang X., Zhao W.-M., Tong W.-M., Wang X.-J., Bogdan F., Furu K., Fu Y., Jia G., Zhao X., Liu J., Krokan H. E., Klungland A., Yang Y.-G., He C. (2013) ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 49, 18–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Feng C., Liu Y., Wang G., Deng Z., Zhang Q., Wu W., Tong Y., Cheng C., Chen Z. (2014) Crystal structures of the human RNA demethylase Alkbh5 reveal basis for substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 11571–11583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jia G., Yang C.-G., Yang S., Jian X., Yi C., Zhou Z., He C. (2008) Oxidative demethylation of 3-methylthymine and 3-methyluracil in single-stranded DNA and RNA by mouse and human FTO. FEBS Lett. 582, 3313–3319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. van den Born E., Vågbø C. B., Songe-Møller L., Leihne V., Lien G. F., Leszczynska G., Malkiewicz A., Krokan H. E., Kirpekar F., Klungland A., Falnes P. Ø. (2011) ALKBH8-mediated formation of a novel diastereomeric pair of wobble nucleosides in mammalian tRNA. Nat Commun. 2, 172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Fu D., Brophy J. A. N., Chan C. T. Y., Atmore K. A., Begley U., Paules R. S., Dedon P. C., Begley T. J., Samson L. D. (2010) Human AlkB homolog ABH8 Is a tRNA methyltransferase required for wobble uridine modification and DNA damage survival. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 2449–2459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Fu Y., Dai Q., Zhang W., Ren J., Pan T., He C. (2010) The AlkB domain of mammalian ABH8 catalyzes hydroxylation of 5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine at the wobble position of tRNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49, 8885–8888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Pastore C., Topalidou I., Forouhar F., Yan A. C., Levy M., Hunt J. F. (2012) Crystal structure and RNA binding properties of the RNA recognition motif (RRM) and AlkB domains in human AlkB homolog 8 (ABH8), an enzyme catalyzing tRNA hypermodification. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 2130–2143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zdżalik D., Vågbø C. B., Kirpekar F., Davydova E., Puścian A., Maciejewska A. M., Krokan H. E., Klungland A., Tudek B., van den Born E., Falnes P. Ø. (2014) Protozoan ALKBH8 oxygenases display both DNA repair and tRNA modification activities. PLoS One 9, e98729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Li M.-M., Nilsen A., Shi Y., Fusser M., Ding Y.-H., Fu Y., Liu B., Niu Y., Wu Y.-S., Huang C.-M., Olofsson M., Jin K.-X., Lv Y., Xu X.-Z., He C., Dong M.-Q., Rendtlew Danielsen J. M., Klungland A., Yang Y.-G. (2013) ALKBH4-dependent demethylation of actin regulates actomyosin dynamics. Nat. Commun. 4, 1832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bjørnstad L. G., Zoppellaro G., Tomter A. B., Falnes P. Ø., Andersson K. K. (2011) Spectroscopic and magnetic studies of wild-type and mutant forms of the Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent decarboxylase ALKBH4. Biochem. J. 434, 391–398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Solberg A., Robertson A. B., Aronsen J. M., Rognmo Ø., Sjaastad I., Wisløff U., Klungland A. (2013) Deletion of mouse Alkbh7 leads to obesity. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 194–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Fu D., Jordan J. J., Samson L. D. (2013) Human ALKBH7 is required for alkylation and oxidation-induced programmed necrosis. Genes Dev. 27, 1089–1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Wang G., He Q., Feng C., Liu Y., Deng Z., Qi X., Wu W., Mei P., Chen Z. (2014) The atomic resolution structure of human AlkB homolog 7 (ALKBH7), a key protein for programmed necrosis and fat metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 27924–27936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hill P. W. S., Amouroux R., Hajkova P. (2014) DNA demethylation, Tet proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in epigenetic reprogramming: an emerging complex story. Genomics 104, 324–333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yu B., Edstrom W. C., Benach J., Hamuro Y., Weber P. C., Gibney B. R., Hunt J. F. (2006) Crystal structures of catalytic complexes of the oxidative DNA/RNA repair enzyme AlkB. Nature 439, 879–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yang C.-G., Yi C., Duguid E. M., Sullivan C. T., Jian X., Rice P. A., He C. (2008) Crystal structures of DNA/RNA repair enzymes AlkB and ABH2 bound to dsDNA. Nature 452, 961–965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Yu B., Hunt J. F. (2009) Enzymological and structural studies of the mechanism of promiscuous substrate recognition by the oxidative DNA repair enzyme AlkB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 14315–14320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Yi C., Jia G., Hou G., Dai Q., Zhang W., Zheng G., Jian X., Yang C.-G., Cui Q., He C. (2010) Iron-catalysed oxidation intermediates captured in a DNA repair dioxygenase. Nature 468, 330–333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Woon E. C. Y., Demetriades M., Bagg E. A. L., Aik W., Krylova S. M., Ma J. H. Y., Chan M., Walport L. J., Wegman D. W., Dack K. N., McDonough M. A., Krylov S. N., Schofield C. J. (2012) Dynamic combinatorial mass spectrometry leads to inhibitors of a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase. J. Med. Chem. 55, 2173–2184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Han Z., Niu T., Chang J., Lei X., Zhao M., Wang Q., Cheng W., Wang J., Feng Y., Chai J. (2010) Crystal structure of the FTO protein reveals basis for its substrate specificity. Nature 464, 1205–1209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Zdżalik D., Domańska A., Prorok P., Kosicki K., van den Born E., Falnes P. Ø., Rizzo C. J., Guengerich F. P., Tudek B. (2015) Differential repair of etheno-DNA adducts by bacterial and human AlkB proteins. DNA Repair (Amst.) 30, 1–10, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.02.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Krebs C., Price J. C., Baldwin J., Saleh L., Green M. T., Bollinger J. M. (2005) Rapid freeze-quench 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy: monitoring changes of an iron-containing active site during a biochemical reaction. Inorg. Chem. 44, 742–757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Schofield C. J., Zhang Z. (1999) Structural and mechanistic studies on 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases and related enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 722–731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Hegg E. L., Whiting A. K., Saari R. E., McCracken J., Hausinger R. P., Que L. (1999) Herbicide-degrading α-keto acid-dependent enzyme TfdA: metal coordination environment and mechanistic insights. Biochemistry 38, 16714–16726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Wilmouth R. C., Turnbull J. J., Welford R. W. D., Clifton I. J., Prescott A. G., Schofield C. J. (2002) Structure and mechanism of anthocyanidin synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Structure 10, 93–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Krebs C., Galonić Fujimori D., Walsh C. T., Bollinger J. M., Jr. (2007) Non-heme Fe(IV)-oxo intermediates. Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 484–492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Liu H., Llano J., Gauld J. W. (2009) A DFT study of nucleobase dealkylation by the DNA repair enzyme AlkB. J. Phys. Chem. B. 113, 4887–4898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Cisneros G. A. (2010) DFT study of a model system for the dealkylation step catalyzed by AlkB. Interdiscip. Sci. 2, 70–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Fang D., Cisneros G. A. (2014) Alternative pathway for the reaction catalyzed by DNA dealkylase AlkB from ab initio QM/MM calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 5136–5148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Wang B., Usharani D., Li C., Shaik S. (2014) Theory uncovers an unusual mechanism of DNA repair of a lesioned adenine by AlkB enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 13895–13901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Delaney J. C., Essigmann J. M. (2004) Mutagenesis, genotoxicity, and repair of 1-methyladenine, 3-alkylcytosines, 1-methylguanine, and 3-methylthymine in alkB Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 14051–14056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Koivisto P., Robins P., Lindahl T., Sedgwick B. (2004) Demethylation of 3-methylthymine in DNA by bacterial and human DNA dioxygenases. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40470–40474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Li D., Delaney J. C., Page C. M., Chen A. S., Wong C., Drennan C. L., Essigmann J. M. (2010) Repair of DNA alkylation damage by the Escherichia coli adaptive response protein AlkB as studied by ESI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Nucleic Acids. 2010, 369434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Li D., Fedeles B. I., Shrivastav N., Delaney J. C., Yang X., Wong C., Drennan C. L., Essigmann J. M. (2013) Removal of N-alkyl modifications from N2-alkylguanine and N4-alkylcytosine in DNA by the adaptive response protein AlkB. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 26, 1182–1187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ehrlich M., Gama-Sosa M. A., Carreira L. H., Ljungdahl L. G., Kuo K. C., Gehrke C. W. (1985) DNA methylation in thermophilic bacteria: N4-methylcytosine, 5-methylcytosine, and N6-methyladenine. Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 1399–1412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Cheng X. (1995) Structure and function of DNA methyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24, 293–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Li D., Delaney J. C., Page C. M., Yang X., Chen A. S., Wong C., Drennan C. L., Essigmann J. M. (2012) Exocyclic carbons adjacent to the N6 of adenine are targets for oxidation by the Escherichia coli adaptive response protein AlkB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8896–8901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Maciejewska A. M., Poznanski J., Kaczmarska Z., Krowisz B., Nieminuszczy J., Polkowska-Nowakowska A., Grzesiuk E., Kusmierek J. T. (2013) AlkB dioxygenase preferentially repairs protonated substrates: specificity against exocyclic adducts and molecular mechanism of action. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 432–441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Falnes P. Ø., Bjørås M., Aas P. A., Sundheim O., Seeberg E. (2004) Substrate specificities of bacterial and human AlkB proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3456–3461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Ougland R., Zhang C. M., Liiv A., Johansen R. F., Seeberg E., Hou Y. M., Remme J., Falnes P. Ø. (2004) AlkB restores the biological function of mRNA and tRNA inactivated by chemical methylation. Mol. Cell 16, 107–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Chang S.-C., Fedeles B. I., Wu J., Delaney J. C., Li D., Zhao L., Christov P. P., Yau E., Singh V., Jost M., Drennan C. L., Marnett L. J., Rizzo C. J., Levine S. S., Guengerich F. P., Essigmann J. M. (2015) Next-generation sequencing reveals the biological significance of the N2,3-ethenoguanine lesion in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 5489–5500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Frick L. E., Delaney J. C., Wong C., Drennan C. L., Essigmann J. M. (2007) Alleviation of 1,N6-ethanoadenine genotoxicity by the Escherichia coli adaptive response protein AlkB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 755–760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Singh V., Fedeles B. I., Li D., Delaney J. C., Kozekov I. D., Kozekova A., Marnett L. J., Rizzo C. J., Essigmann J. M. (2014) Mechanism of repair of acrolein- and malondialdehyde-derived exocyclic guanine adducts by the α-ketoglutarate/Fe(II) dioxygenase AlkB. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27, 1619–1631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Delaney J. C., Essigmann J. M. (2006) Assays for determining lesion bypass efficiency and mutagenicity of site-specific DNA lesions in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 408, 1–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Shrivastav N., Fedeles B. I., Li D., Delaney J. C., Frick L. E., Foti J. J., Walker G. C., Essigmann J. M. (2014) A chemical genetics analysis of the roles of bypass polymerase DinB and DNA repair protein AlkB in processing N2-alkylguanine lesions in vivo. PLoS One 9, e94716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Gao W., Li L., Xu P., Fang J., Xiao S., Chen S. (2011) Frequent down-regulation of hABH2 in gastric cancer and its involvement in growth of cancer cells. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 26, 577–584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Loeb L. A., Harris C. C. (2008) Advances in chemical carcinogenesis: a historical review and prospective. Cancer Res. 68, 6863–6872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Shrivastav N., Li D., Essigmann J. M. (2010) Chemical biology of mutagenesis and DNA repair: cellular responses to DNA alkylation. Carcinogenesis. 31, 59–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Kalliri E., Grzyska P. K., Hausinger R. P. (2005) Kinetic and spectroscopic investigation of CoII, NiII, and N-oxalylglycine inhibition of the FeII/α-ketoglutarate dioxygenase, TauD. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338, 191–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Shim E.-H., Livi C. B., Rakheja D., Tan J., Benson D., Parekh V., Kho E.-Y., Ghosh A. P., Kirkman R., Velu S., Dutta S., Chenna B., Rea S. L., Mishur R. J., Li Q., Johnson-Pais T. L., Guo L., Bae S., Wei S., Block K., Sudarshan S. (2014) l-2-Hydroxyglutarate: an epigenetic modifier and putative oncometabolite in renal cancer. Cancer Discov. 4, 1290–1298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Krylova S. M., Koshkin V., Bagg E., Schofield C. J., Krylov S. N. (2012) Mechanistic studies on the application of DNA aptamers as inhibitors of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases. J. Med. Chem. 55, 3546–3552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES