Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1993 Jan;12(1):223–232. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05648.x

The determinants for Sm protein binding to Xenopus U1 and U5 snRNAs are complex and non-identical.

A Jarmolowski 1, I W Mattaj 1
PMCID: PMC413195  PMID: 8381350

Abstract

The Sm binding sites of different spliceosomal U small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), the RNA structural elements required for interaction with common snRNP proteins, have been considered to be similar or identical. Here we show that this is not the case. Instead, structural and sequence features unique to U1 or U5 snRNAs that contribute to common protein binding are identified. The determinants of Sm protein binding in both RNAs are complex, consisting in U5 of minimally two and in U1 of minimally four separate structural elements. Even the most conserved features of the two RNAs, single-stranded regions whose generalized sequence is PuA(U)nGPu, are not functionally interchangeable in protein binding. At least one of the newly defined RNA elements functions in assembly with the common proteins, but is not required for their stable binding thereafter. U1, but not U5, snRNP requires a trimethyl guanosine cap structure for its transport to the nucleus. This is not a consequence of the differences in common snRNP binding to the two RNAs, but is due to structural features of U1 RNA that do not contribute to Sm protein binding.

Full text

PDF
223

Images in this article

224Image
on p.224
225Image
on p.225
226Image
on p.226
227Image
on p.227
227Image
on p.227
228Image
on p.228
228Image
on p.228
229Image
on p.229

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bach M., Lührmann R. Protein-RNA interactions in 20S U5 snRNPs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Jan 17;1088(1):139–143. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90164-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black D. L., Pinto A. L. U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein: RNA structure analysis and ATP-dependent interaction with U4/U6. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3350–3359. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branlant C., Krol A., Ebel J. P., Lazar E., Haendler B., Jacob M. U2 RNA shares a structural domain with U1, U4, and U5 RNAs. EMBO J. 1982;1(10):1259–1265. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb00022.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotten M., Gick O., Vasserot A., Schaffner G., Birnstiel M. L. Specific contacts between mammalian U7 snRNA and histone precursor RNA are indispensable for the in vitro 3' RNA processing reaction. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):801–808. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02878.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fischer U., Darzynkiewicz E., Tahara S. M., Dathan N. A., Lührmann R., Mattaj I. W. Diversity in the signals required for nuclear accumulation of U snRNPs and variety in the pathways of nuclear transport. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(4):705–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischer U., Lührmann R. An essential signaling role for the m3G cap in the transport of U1 snRNP to the nucleus. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):786–790. doi: 10.1126/science.2143847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guthrie C., Patterson B. Spliceosomal snRNAs. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:387–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamm J., Dathan N. A., Scherly D., Mattaj I. W. Multiple domains of U1 snRNA, including U1 specific protein binding sites, are required for splicing. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1237–1244. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08231.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamm J., Kazmaier M., Mattaj I. W. In vitro assembly of U1 snRNPs. EMBO J. 1987 Nov;6(11):3479–3485. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02672.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamm J., van Santen V. L., Spritz R. A., Mattaj I. W. Loop I of U1 small nuclear RNA is the only essential RNA sequence for binding of specific U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):4787–4791. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.4787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heinrichs V., Hackl W., Lührmann R. Direct binding of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein G to the Sm site of small nuclear RNA. Ultraviolet light cross-linking of protein G to the AAU stretch within the Sm site (AAUUUGUGG) of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein reconstituted in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 5;227(1):15–28. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90678-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones M. H., Guthrie C. Unexpected flexibility in an evolutionarily conserved protein-RNA interaction: genetic analysis of the Sm binding site. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2555–2561. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07436.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kazmaier M., Tebb G., Mattaj I. W. Functional characterization of X. laevis U5 snRNA genes. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):3071–3078. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02614.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kretzner L., Krol A., Rosbash M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae U1 small nuclear RNA secondary structure contains both universal and yeast-specific domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(2):851–855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kretzner L., Rymond B. C., Rosbash M. S. cerevisiae U1 RNA is large and has limited primary sequence homology to metazoan U1 snRNA. Cell. 1987 Aug 14;50(4):593–602. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehmeier T., Foulaki K., Lührmann R. Evidence for three distinct D proteins, which react differentially with anti-Sm autoantibodies, in the cores of the major snRNPs U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6475–6484. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lerner E. A., Lerner M. R., Janeway C. A., Jr, Steitz J. A. Monoclonal antibodies to nucleic acid-containing cellular constituents: probes for molecular biology and autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2737–2741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lerner M. R., Steitz J. A. Antibodies to small nuclear RNAs complexed with proteins are produced by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5495–5499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liautard J. P., Sri-Widada J., Brunel C., Jeanteur P. Structural organization of ribonucleoproteins containing small nuclear RNAs from HeLa cells. Proteins interact closely with a similar structural domain of U1, U2, U4 and U5 small nuclear RNAs. J Mol Biol. 1982 Dec 15;162(3):623–643. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90392-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lührmann R., Kastner B., Bach M. Structure of spliceosomal snRNPs and their role in pre-mRNA splicing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Nov 30;1087(3):265–292. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(90)90001-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mattaj I. W. Cap trimethylation of U snRNA is cytoplasmic and dependent on U snRNP protein binding. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):905–911. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mattaj I. W., De Robertis E. M. Nuclear segregation of U2 snRNA requires binding of specific snRNP proteins. Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90314-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mowry K. L., Steitz J. A. Identification of the human U7 snRNP as one of several factors involved in the 3' end maturation of histone premessenger RNA's. Science. 1987 Dec 18;238(4834):1682–1687. doi: 10.1126/science.2825355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan Z. Q., Prives C. Assembly of functional U1 and U2 human-amphibian hybrid snRNPs in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1328–1331. doi: 10.1126/science.2970672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Patterson B., Guthrie C. An essential yeast snRNA with a U5-like domain is required for splicing in vivo. Cell. 1987 Jun 5;49(5):613–624. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90537-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riedel N., Wolin S., Guthrie C. A subset of yeast snRNA's contains functional binding sites for the highly conserved Sm antigen. Science. 1987 Jan 16;235(4786):328–331. doi: 10.1126/science.2948278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Siliciano P. G., Guthrie C. 5' splice site selection in yeast: genetic alterations in base-pairing with U1 reveal additional requirements. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1258–1267. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Siliciano P. G., Jones M. H., Guthrie C. Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a U1-like small nuclear RNA with unexpected properties. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1484–1487. doi: 10.1126/science.3306922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Strub K., Galli G., Busslinger M., Birnstiel M. L. The cDNA sequences of the sea urchin U7 small nuclear RNA suggest specific contacts between histone mRNA precursor and U7 RNA during RNA processing. EMBO J. 1984 Dec 1;3(12):2801–2807. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02212.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Séraphin B., Kretzner L., Rosbash M. A U1 snRNA:pre-mRNA base pairing interaction is required early in yeast spliceosome assembly but does not uniquely define the 5' cleavage site. EMBO J. 1988 Aug;7(8):2533–2538. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tollervey D., Mattaj I. W. Fungal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins share properties with plant and vertebrate U-snRNPs. EMBO J. 1987 Feb;6(2):469–476. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04777.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wersig C., Bindereif A. Reconstitution of functional mammalian U4 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein: Sm protein binding is not essential for splicing in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1460–1468. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeller R., Carri M. T., Mattaj I. W., De Robertis E. M. Xenopus laevis U1 snRNA genes: characterisation of transcriptionally active genes reveals major and minor repeated gene families. EMBO J. 1984 May;3(5):1075–1081. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01931.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeller R., Nyffenegger T., De Robertis E. M. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of snRNPs and stockpiled snRNA-binding proteins during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1983 Feb;32(2):425–434. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhuang Y., Weiner A. M. A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5' splice site mutation. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):827–835. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zieve G. W., Sauterer R. A. Cell biology of the snRNP particles. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1990;25(1):1–46. doi: 10.3109/10409239009090604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES