Skip to main content
The FASEB Journal logoLink to The FASEB Journal
. 2012 Nov;26(11):4540–4547. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-213496

Defining the cellular repertoire of GPCRs identifies a profibrotic role for the most highly expressed receptor, protease-activated receptor 1, in cardiac fibroblasts

Aaron N Snead *, Paul A Insel *,†,1
PMCID: PMC3475245  PMID: 22859370

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have many roles in cell regulation and are commonly used as drug targets, but the repertoire of GPCRs expressed by individual cell types has not been defined. Here we use an unbiased approach, GPCR RT-PCR array, to define the expression of nonchemosensory GPCRs by cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) isolated from Rattus norvegicus. CFs were selected because of their importance for cardiac structure and function and their contribution to cardiac fibrosis, which occurs with advanced age, after acute injury (e.g., myocardial infarction), and in disease states (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension). We discovered that adult rat CFs express 190 GPCRs and that activation of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), the most highly expressed receptor, raises the expression of profibrotic markers in rat CFs, resulting in a 60% increase in collagen synthesis and conversion to a profibrogenic myofibroblast phenotype. We use siRNA knockdown of PAR1 (90% decrease in mRNA) to show that the profibrotic effects of thrombin are PAR1-dependent. These findings, which define the expression of GPCRs in CFs, provide a proof of principle of an approach to discover previously unappreciated, functionally relevant GPCRs and reveal a potential role for thrombin and PAR1 in wound repair and pathophysiology of the adult heart.—Snead, A. N., Insel, P. A. Defining the cellular repertoire of GPCRs identifies a profibrotic role for the most highly expressed receptor, protease-activated receptor 1, in cardiac fibroblasts.

Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptors, 7-transmembrane receptors, cardiac fibrosis, thrombin, myofibroblasts


Heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the United States. Cardiac fibrosis, which can result from numerous forms of heart disease, is characterized by the transformation of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) to myofibroblasts, which synthesize and excrete excessive amounts of collagen-rich extracellular matrix (ECM), thereby resulting in reduced cardiac function and eventually in heart failure. CFs, the most abundant cell type in the heart (based on number of cells), play a critical role in regulating the production of ECM but can result in disease if they produce excessive ECM (1). A key step in disease progression can be the activation and phenotypic conversion of quiescent fibroblasts into active matrix-producing myofibroblasts. A variety of stimuli, including angiotensin II (24) and endothelin (5), which act via G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), can induce fibroblast activation and this phenotypic conversion.

GPCRs [also known as 7-transmembrane (7-TM) receptors] reside on the cell surface, transmit extracellular signals into cells, and regulate downstream events through heterotrimeric G proteins, β-arrestins, and effector molecules. GPCRs are the largest family of cell surface receptors (∼3% of the mammalian genome). Based on their important role in signal transduction, patterns of distribution on particular cell types and tissues, accessibility on the plasma membrane, druggability, and ligand selectivity, GPCRs are the largest class of drug targets for FDA-approved therapeutics (6).

Despite their large number and utility as targets for drugs, the repertoire of GPCRs expressed by individual cells is not well defined. Recent evidence has indicated that various tissues express numerous GPCRs, including ones not previously known to be expressed in such tissues (710). To date, however, little is known regarding the number of different GPCRs that individual cells express, the most highly expressed receptors on such cells, or their contribution to cellular function.

We thus set out to define GPCR expression by a particular cell type and chose CFs for this study, hypothesizing that CFs might express previously unappreciated receptors that would contribute to their functional activity and that might be candidates as therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis. Techniques have been described to analyze the expression of GPCRs in a tissue-specific manner (710), albeit certain such methods are proprietary. Here we use RT-GPCR arrays to define GPCR expression in CFs. We find that the most abundant receptor, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), in adult rat CFs (rCFs) is functionally active, i.e., profibrogenic, and stimulates the transformation of CFs to myofibroblasts. These results document the ability of an unbiased approach to identify functionally relevant GPCRs in particular cells types and reveal a previously unappreciated role for thrombin and PAR1 in the regulation of adult CFs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA)except α-thrombin (Enzyme Research Laboratories, South Bend, IN, USA), angiotensin II (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO, USA), or as specified below.

Cardiac fibroblast isolation and culture

CFs were isolated from adult male Sprague-Dawley rats as described previously (11). Briefly, adult (8–10 wk) rats (∼200 g) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylosine (10 mg/kg). The heart was excised and then perfused with medium containing collagenase type 2 (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ, USA) via a modified reverse-Langendorff apparatus. The heart was minced and triturated to separate cells from decellularized matrix. The CFs were separated from myocytes by gravity separation, resuspended in DMEM + 10% FBS + penicillin-streptomycin, and plated on 10-cm dishes. On reaching confluency, fibroblasts were passaged into 6- or 12-well plates (150,000 or 70,000 cells/well, respectively) and serum starved for 24 h before treatment. All experiments were done with cells passaged only once, with the exception of the RT-PCR GPCR array, for which unpassaged CFs were used.

RT-PCR GPCR array

Freshly isolated CFs were plated and grown in DMEM + 10% FBS + penicillin-streptomycin until ∼60% confluent. Cells were then serum starved for 24 h, and RNA was isolated using an RNeasy kit with DNase treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA was converted to cDNA using SuperScript III reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) using the recommended protocol. GPCR expression was determined with Taqman GPCR Arrays (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the recommended protocol, run on an ABI Prism 7900HT system (Applied Biosystems), and analyzed with the Sequence Detection System software (Applied Biosystems). Quantification of GPCR expression was expressed relative to 18S rRNA. Data shown are from the average of 2 independent arrays.

A table is available from the authors that provides average expression [dC(t)] data (with sd) for all 342 GPCRs (190 detected, 152 not detected), 18 control genes, and 20 GPCR-associated genes, in addition to the array-specific identification number, gene abbreviation, formal gene name, U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Reference Sequence (RefSeq), GenBank mRNA ID, and amplicon length for each probe set.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol and converted to cDNA using SuperScript III reagent. Gene-specific primers designed as described previously (ref. 12;1 μM final concentration) were mixed with cDNAs and SYBR green reagent (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for PCR amplification on a DNA Engine Opticon 2 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene expression levels were quantified relative to that of 18S rRNA. Oligonucleotides used for RT-PCR are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotides used for RT-PCR

Gene Sequence, 5′–3′
Forward Reverse
18S GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG
PAI-1 GGAGAAGCGAAACAGGAGTG TCCAGAAGGGGATATGTTGC
αSMA CATCAGGAACCTCGAGAAGC TCGGATACTTCAGGGTCAGG
CCN1 AGCTCCAGCACCATCAAGAC CTGCAGTCCTCGTTGAGTTG
TGFβ1 CCTGGAAAGGGCTCAACA GTTGGTTGTAGAGGGCAAGG
EPAC1 GTGTTGGTGAAGGTCAATTCTG CCACACCACGGGCATC
PAR1 GCCATCGCTGTGTTTGTCTT CAGGAACCGGTCAATGCTTA
β2AR ATAAGGCCCGAGTGGTCATC CTGAGGTTTTGGGCATGAAA
S1PR1 AGCTTCGTCCCGCTTGAG GCCTTAACCACTGGGATGCT
S1PR2 CACAGCCAACAGTCACCAAA CACCAGAAGGTTCTCCACCA
S1PR3 AGATGAGCCTTGCAGAACGA GGTGGTGATGAGGGTGCTAC

Immunoblot analysis

Cell lysates were collected by scraping wells in the presence of 150 mM carbonate buffer (pH 11) and homogenized via sonication. Total protein concentrations were determined using a dye binding reagent (Bio-Rad) and were separated by SDS/PAGE in 10% polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen). Gels were transferred to PVDF membranes using an iBLOT transfer machine (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked using 5% nonfat dry milk (w/v) in PBS Tween-20 (PBST) solution and incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Blots were visualized after binding of secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) using SuperSignal Westdura Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Densitometric quantification of protein expression was done by using ImageJ software (U.S. NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). All data were normalized relative to β-tubulin. Antibodies against α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and β-tubulin were purchased from Invitrogen, BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA), and Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA), respectively.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed with slight modification of a previous procedure (11). CFs were plated onto fibronectin-coated coverslips in 24-well plates (70,000 cells/well) overnight, serum starved for 24 h, and then treated as indicated for 24 h at 37°C. The CFs were then washed with PBS and fixed with 10% buffered formalin, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X in PBS, blocked, and probed with anti-αSMA antibody (Invitrogen). Samples were then washed and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen), washed, and mounted on slides with Vectashield containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Images were obtained with a Deltavision RT Deconvolution Microscope (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA, USA) at the University of California at San Diego, Microscope core facility and analyzed with SoftWorx software (Applied Precision) on a Silicon Graphics Octane workstation (Silicon Graphics International, Fremont, CA, USA).

Collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation

[3H]proline incorporation by rCFs was determined with slight modification of a previously described protocol (11). Briefly, cells were passaged in 12-well plates (70,000 cells/well) in DMEM + 10% FBS + penicillin-streptomycin and grown overnight. Cells were washed, incubated in serum-free DMEM + penicillin-streptomycin for an additional 24 h, and then incubated with test ligands in the presence of [3H]proline (1 μCi/ml final concentration; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for 24 h at 37°C. Following the treatment period, cells were washed with PBS and solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH (300 μl/well) for 5 min at 37°C. Cell lysates were then neutralized with 0.5 N HCl and precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) overnight (final concentration 20%). TCA-insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation (>10,000 rpm for 10 min), washed 3× with 5% TCA, and solubilized with 200 μl of 0.2 N NaOH. pH was neutralized with 0.2 N HCl, and samples were incubated with collagenase II (final concentration 2 mg/ml collagenase in Tris-CaCl2-N-ethylmaleimide buffer) for 1 h at 37°C. After this incubation, undigested material was precipitated with TCA (10% final concentration at 4°C for 1 h) and centrifuged (>10,000 rpm for 10 min). Radioactivity in the supernatants, which contain collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline, representing [3H]proline incorporated into collagen, was quantified using a liquid scintillation counter.

[3H]thymidine incorporation

[3H]thymidine incorporation by rCFs was determined with a slight modification of a previously described protocol (13). Briefly, cells were passaged in 12-well plates (70,000 cells/well) in DMEM + 10% FBS + penicillin-streptomycin and grown overnight. Cells were then washed, incubated in serum-free DMEM + penicillin-streptomycin for an additional 24 h, and then treated with test ligands in the presence of [3H]thymidine (1 μCi/ml final concentration, PerkinElmer) for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed with cold PBS + 7.5% TCA and solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH (5 min at 37°C). Radioactivity in the lysates was quantified using a liquid scintillation counter.

siRNA transfection

CFs were plated in 12-well plates (70,000 cells/well) overnight and were transfected with scrambled negative control siRNA (Ambion, Grand Island, NY, USA) or PAR1-specific siRNA (F2r, s129806; Ambion) at 5 nM final concentration using Lipofectamine RNAi-max (Invitrogen). After 4 h, the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM; incubations were continued for 24 h before the indicated treatments.

Statistical analysis

All data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as means ± se. Statistical calculations were done using 1 way ANOVA with either Dunnett or Bonferroni posttests. Values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

PAR1 is the most abundant GPCR in rCFs

Using a RT-PCR GPCR array to identify nonchemosensory GPCRs expressed in cDNA generated from freshly isolated rCFs, we discovered that these cells express 190 GPCRs with a median dC(t) value of 20.9 and identified PAR1 as the most abundant receptor (Fig. 1 and Table 2; see Materials and Methods, RT-PCR GPCR Array). Among the most abundant receptors are the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3, a number of frizzled homologue receptors, the P2Y2 receptor, and several orphan GPCRs. By contrast, certain receptors that have been the focus of previous studies with CFs, e.g., angiotensin, endothelin, and β2-adrenergic receptors, are expressed to a much lower extent than are PAR1 receptors (Table 3). Expression of select GPCRs was confirmed by RT-PCR with independent primer sets, and the rank order of expression closely matched results from the GPCR arrays (Supplemental Table S1). Limited prior data have indicated expression or a functional role for PAR1 in cardiac fibroblasts (1416), but its actions in inflammation and endothelial barrier function have demonstrated that PAR1 can regulate early stages of wound repair (1719). Since PAR1 expression is >4-fold higher than the next most abundant GPCR in rCFs, we undertook studies to define its functional role.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Real-time-PCR array expression of nonchemosensory GPCRs in adult rCFs. Histogram of the normalized dC(t) values for all detected GPCRs (152 not detected). Table 2 lists the 12 most abundant GPCRs. Cycle threshold values were normalized relative to 18S rRNA, with a lower dC(t) value indicating higher expression.

Table 2.

The 12 most abundant GPCRs in rCFs

Gene Receptor name Average dC(t)
F2r PAR1 11.6
Fzd4 Frizzled homolog 4 13.8
S1pr3 S1P receptor 3 (Edg3) 15.0
Fzd2 Frizzled homolog 2 15.0
Smo Smoothened homolog 15.5
Gpr125 G-protein-coupled receptor 125 16.0
Gpr176 G-protein-coupled receptor 176 16.3
Gprc5b GPCR, family C, group 5, member B 16.5
Mrgprf MAS-related GPR, member F 16.8
Gabbr1 γ-Aminobutyric acid B receptor 1 16.8
Lphn1 Latrophilin 1 16.9
P2ry2 P2Y2 (purinergic) receptor 17.0

See Fig. 1.

Table 3.

RT-PCR GPCR array data for select GPCRs

Gene Receptor name Fold decrease relative to PAR1
Adrb2 β2-Adrenergic receptor 123
Agtr1a Angiotensin II receptor, type 1a 124
Agtr1b Angiotensin II receptor, type 1b 2810
Agtr2 Angiotensin II receptor, type 2 ND
Agtrl1 Angiotensin receptor-like 1 490
Ednra Endothelin receptor type A 873
Ednrb Endothelin receptor type B 201
F2rl1 Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) 699
F2rl2 Protease-activated receptor 3 (PAR3) 277
F2rl3 Protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) 1760
P2ry2 P2Y2 (purinergic) receptor 42
S1p1 S1P receptor 1 (Edg 1) 340
S1p2 S1P receptor 2 (Edg 5) 82
S1p3 S1P receptor 3 (Edg 3) 11
S1p4 S1P receptor 4 (Edg 6) 687
S1p5 S1P receptor 5 (Edg 8) 177

Expression from RT-PCR array is shown as a fold decrease relative to PAR1, the most abundant GPCR detected. ND, not detected.

PAR1 activation is profibrotic in rCFs

PARs are a unique class of GPCRs in that they are activated by proteolytic cleavage of their N termini, which exposes a peptide ligand responsible for the binding and activation of the receptor (20). PAR1, activated physiologically by the protease thrombin, can also be activated by synthetic peptide ligands [e.g., thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (TRAP6; SFLLRN)] that present the amino acid sequence of this cleavage site, thereby mimicking the activity of thrombin.

To define the functional effects of PAR1 activation, we treated rCFs with thrombin or TRAP6 for up to 24 h. Both thrombin and TRAP6 elevated the expression of profibrotic markers in rCFs (Fig. 2): PAI-1 (which regulates ECM turnover; ref. 21), the myofibroblast marker αSMA (1), Cyr61, CTGF, Nov family member 1 (CCN1; aka Cyr61; the CCN family of proteins are important for fibroblast activation, migration, and ECM synthesis; ref. 22), and the profibrotic cytokine transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1; ref. 23). Thrombin and TRAP6 maximally and respectively increased expression of PAI-1 by 8.4- and 10-fold, αSMA by 2.7- and 3.8-fold, CCN1 by 14.7- and 6-fold, and TGFβ1 by 2- and 1.6-fold. Thrombin and TRAP6 decreased the expression of the exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac1), an antifibrotic gene (24), by 2.1- and 1.9-fold, respectively (Fig. 2E, K). We tested whether the increased mRNA levels of PAI-1 and αSMA promoted by PAR1 activation are reflected by changes in protein expression. Thrombin and TRAP6 increased protein levels of PAI-1 (9.1- and 14.3-fold, respectively, with effects peaking at 8 h) and αSMA (2.3- and 2.7-fold at 24 h), results akin to the changes in mRNA levels (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

PAR1 activation alters expression of fibrotic markers in rCFs. mRNA expression of fibrotic markers was determined by RT-PCR in CFs that were initially serum starved for 24 h and then incubated with DMEM (control), thrombin (4.5 nM, A–F), or TRAP6 (20 μM, G–L) for various times up to 24 h. Treatments with thrombin and TRAP6 were staggered so that all samples were collected at the final 24 h time point. Shown are data for PAI-1 (A, G), αSMA (B, H), EPAC1 (C, I), CCN1 (also known as Cyr61; D, J), and TGFβ1 (E, K). Data are summarized in F, L to show the relative magnitude of effects of treatment on each marker. Data are means ± se of ≤4 experiments performed in duplicate. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effects of thrombin on the protein levels of PAI-1 and αSMA. CFs were treated as described in Fig. 2. Cell lysates were prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE and probed for either PAI-1 (A) or αSMA (B) expression. Densitometry and quantification were performed and normalized to β-tubulin expression. Values represent means ± se of 3 experiments performed in triplicate. **P ≤ 0.01.

Certain markers (e.g., CCN1) were transiently affected, while other effects [PAI-1, αSMA, TGFβ1, and the decrease in exchange protein activated by cAMP 1 (EPAC1)] were more persistent, implying that PAR1 activation produces a complex profibrotic response in rCFs (Fig. 2F, L). In addition, thrombin and TRAP6 have different kinetics in their effect on the expression of the fibrotic markers. The effects of thrombin were more persistent than those in response to the peptide, indicating that TRAP6 does not fully mimic thrombin during long-term treatment. Despite these differences in the response of rCFs to thrombin and TRAP6, the overall response is profibrotic and similar to that observed for other profibrotic stimuli, such as angiotensin II and TGFβ1 (22, 2426).

PAR1 activation induces morphological changes and increases cellular collagen synthesis in rCFs

To confirm the profibrotic activity of PAR1 activation on rCFs, we assayed the effects of thrombin on cell morphology, the production of ECM, and cellular proliferation. The activation of fibroblasts and transformation to the myofibroblast phenotype produces morphological changes that we assessed using immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 4AC). Treatment with thrombin (4.5 nM, 24 h) increased αSMA staining and induced reorganization of the actin network: the appearance of αSMA changed from diffuse cytosolic localization into defined actin stress fibers (Fig. 4B). Thrombin-treated cells also were generally larger and had a more rigid appearance. The myofibroblast phenotype induced on thrombin treatment of CFs was similar to that produced by the profibrotic agonist angiotensin II (1 μM, 24 h, Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects of thrombin on cell morphology, collagen synthesis, and proliferation in rCFs. A–C) Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed on CFs plated on fibronectin-coated coverslips, serum starved for 24 h, and incubated for 24 h with DMEM (control; A), thrombin (4.5 nM; B), or angiotensin II (1 μM; C). Cells were stained for αSMA (green) and nuclear staining of DNA with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 30 μm. D) Collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation was determined for CFs grown for 24 h in serum-free medium and then incubated for 24 h in the presence of [3H]proline (1 μCi/ml) with serum-free medium (control), thrombin (4.5 nM), angiotensin II (Ang II; 1 μM), or FBS (2.5% v/v). E) [3H]thymidine incorporation was determined for cells treated as in D but incubated with [3H]thymidine (1 μCi/ml). Data are means ± se of results from ≤4 experiments performed in triplicate. **P ≤ 0.01.

We assayed collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation as a measure of the effects of thrombin on ECM production and assessed cell proliferation by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation. Incubation with thrombin for 24 h increased collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation by 60% (relative to untreated cells), a response similar to that produced by angiotensin II (Fig. 4D). Thrombin had a limited, statistically insignificant effect on [3H]thymidine incorporation, by contrast with the mitogenic effect of the control stimulus FBS (Fig. 4E). Thus, thrombin initiates a proliferation-independent increase in collagen synthesis in adult rCFs.

Profibrotic response of rCFs to thrombin is mediated by PAR1 receptors

We next tested if the responses to thrombin were mediated by PAR1. It is difficult to completely and selectively inhibit these receptors with small-molecule antagonists (at least in part as a consequence of the irreversible activation of PAR1 receptors by thrombin). We thus used a knockdown approach by transfection of a PAR1-specific siRNA. This approach reduced PAR1 mRNA expression by 90% compared with cells transfected with a nonspecific control siRNA (Fig. 5A). The knockdown of PAR1 had no effect on basal PAI-1 or αSMA expression but almost totally eliminated the thrombin-induced increase of these profibrotic markers relative to control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 5B, C). In addition, PAR1 knockdown prevented the thrombin-induced increase in collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation, which was observed in cells transfected with a nonspecific control siRNA (Fig. 5D). Thus, the profibrotic effects of thrombin on CFs are mediated by PAR1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

PAR1-dependence of profibrotic effects of thrombin on rCFs. A–C) CFs were serum starved and transfected for 24 h with either control scrambled siRNA (SCR; 5 nM) or PAR1-specific siRNA (PAR1; 5 nM) and then incubated with DMEM (open bars) or thrombin (4.5 nM, solid bars). After 4 h, lysates were collected, and the expression of PAR1 (A), PAI-1 (B), and αSMA (C) was determined by RT-PCR. D) CFs transfected similarly were also incubated (as in Fig. 4D) with [3H]proline and either DMEM (open bars) or thrombin (4.5 nM, solid bars) for 24 h and analyzed for collagenase-sensitive [3H]proline incorporation. Data shown are means ± se of results from ≤3 experiments performed in duplicate. *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to define the expression of all nonchemosensory GPCRs in an individual cell type, adult CFs in particular. We hypothesized that the GPCRs that have been the main focus of prior research may not necessarily be those most highly expressed or as important as others in terms of modulating cell function (e.g., fibrotic activity of CFs). We speculated that since relatively few GPCRs have been studied in the context of tissue fibrosis, a number of functionally important GPCRs may contribute to this process and thus may be therapeutic targets. Since approaches to develop GPCR-targeted drugs are well established (6), validated GPCR targets might readily translate to new clinical therapies.

Tissue response to injury is a highly complex process that occurs via conserved mechanisms in many tissues. While essential for the repair and functional recovery of tissues and organs, the healing process can lead to disability or disease. There are 3 stages in the classical response to injury: inflammation, new tissue generation, and remodeling (27). Thrombin/PAR1 signaling contributes to this response, in particular via activation of platelets and in cells such as smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells by stimulating proinflammatory responses and cell proliferation (1719). Fibroblasts mediate many aspects of the later stages of wound response, including αSMA-dependent wound contraction, synthesis of collagen and other ECM proteins (thus producing a scar) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-dependent remodeling of the scar (1). PAR1 has been shown to regulate fibroblast-dependent collagen synthesis and remodeling in the liver, kidney, lung, and skin (2832), but a role for PAR1 in CFs has not been clearly defined.

Among the 190 GPCRs that we detected in rCFs, PAR1 is the highest expressed GPCR and is profibrotic. The results thus provide a proof of principle of our approach to identify functional GPCRs. In addition to PAR1, S1P receptors, frizzled homologue receptors, and the P2Y2 receptor are among the most abundant receptors expressed by rCFs. We recently described profibrotic responses of rCF P2Y2 receptors, including via autocrine/paracrine activation; others have described functional roles for frizzled homologue receptors and S1P receptors in CFs (12, 3335). In addition, we identified several orphan GPCRs whose mRNA is highly abundant in CFs.

These results imply that PAR1 has a previously unrecognized role in later stages of the wound healing response in the heart. Both thrombin and the peptide TRAP6 alter the expression of fibrotic markers in CFs in a receptor-dependent manner. Response to thrombin lasts longer than does that to the peptide agonist. Thus, PAR1 is functional in rCFs as a profibrotic receptor, but TRAP6 does not fully mimic the response to thrombin in this system.

While the overall result of PAR1 activation is profibrotic in CFs, this response is qualitatively and quantitatively complex in terms of the number of cellular processes affected and the kinetics of these effects. Kinetically, the responses are of 3 types: fibrotic markers that are rapidly but transiently increased by PAR1 activation (CCN1); those whose expression is rapidly and persistently altered (PAI-1, αSMA, EPAC1); and markers that are only affected after prolonged treatment (TGFβ1). This delay in TGFβ1 expression perhaps results from an indirect effect of PAR1 activation, i.e., the initiation of an autocrine feedback loop that reinforces PAR1 stimulation. PAR1 can couple to numerous signaling pathways via Gi, Gq, G12/13, and non-G-protein pathways, and its activity is regulated through receptor localization, desensitization, and internalization (36). It will be important in future studies to identify the specific signaling pathways that mediate the profibrotic effects of PAR1 in CFs.

Thrombin initiates myofibroblast transformation and stimulates the synthesis of collagen, the primary ECM component, in a proliferation-independent manner in rCFs. Our results do not show effects of thrombin on proliferation in adult rCFs, a finding that contrasts with previous evidence (which we replicate in Supplemental Fig. S1) that thrombin induces proliferation in neonatal rCFs (14). This difference in response to thrombin treatment of neonatal and adult CFs suggests that the proliferative capacity of CFs changes following neonatal life. Perhaps the response of CFs to profibrotic stimuli switches from a proliferative one during development to a more structural adaptation in the fully mature organ. Such a differential response has been suggested for fibroblasts in other tissues (37).

These data thus present a novel approach to identify unique and functionally relevant GPCRs in individual cell types that may lead to potentially novel therapeutic targets (38). As the most abundant GPCR in CFs, PAR1 may be a useful target for inhibition of cardiac fibrosis. Several in vivo models of cardiac injury have implicated an indirect role for PAR1 in cardiac remodeling and fibrosis. Studies using the PAR1 inhibitor SCH79797 have shown promise in this regard (39). Although PAR1-knockout mice are not protected from ischemia-reperfusion injury (40), increased expression of PAR1 seems to be associated with adverse cardiac remodeling after irradiation (41). Further efforts, most likely using a variety of approaches, will be needed to validate PAR1 as a useful therapeutic target in the heart, and specifically in settings of cardiac fibrosis. Moreover, our approach, GPCR array and validation of newly identified receptors, offers promise as one that should have utility in a wide number of cell types and settings.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants 2P01-HL-066941, 5T32-HL-007444, and GM-68524; University of California at San Diego Cancer Center specialized support grant P30-CA-23100; and the Ellison Medical Foundation.

This article includes supplemental data. Please visit http://www.fasebj.org to obtain this information.

Abbreviations:
αSMA
α-smooth muscle actin
CCN1
Cyr61, CTFG, Nov family member 1
CF
cardiac fibroblast
DAPI
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
ECM
extracellular matrix
EPAC1
exchange protein activated by cAMP 1
GPCR
G-protein-coupled receptor
PAI-1
plasminogen activator inhibitor 1
PAR1
protease-activated receptor 1
rCF
rat cardiac fibroblast
TCA
trichloroacetic acid
TGFβ
transforming growth factor β
TRAP6
thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (SFLLRN)

REFERENCES

  • 1. Gabbiani G. (2003) The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J. Pathol. 200, 500–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hunyady L., Catt K. J. (2006) Pleiotropic AT1 receptor signaling pathways mediating physiological and pathogenic actions of angiotensin II. Mol. Endocrinol. 20, 953–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Oro C., Qian H., Thomas W. G. (2007) Type 1 angiotensin receptor pharmacology: signaling beyond G proteins. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 210–226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ruster C., Wolf G. (2011) Angiotensin II as a morphogenic cytokine stimulating renal fibrogenesis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22, 1189–1199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vignon-Zellweger N., Heiden S., Miyauchi T., Emoto N. (2012) Endothelin and endothelin receptors in the renal and cardiovascular systems. [E-pub ahead of print] Life Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Overington J. P., Al-Lazikani B., Hopkins A. L. (2006) How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 993–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hansen A., Chen Y., Inman J. M., Phan Q. N., Qi Z. Q., Xiang C. C., Palkovits M., Cherman N., Kuznetsov S. A., Robey P. G., Mezey E., Brownstein M. J. (2007) Sensitive and specific method for detecting G protein-coupled receptor mRNAs. Nat. Methods 4, 35–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Regard J. B., Sato I. T., Coughlin S. R. (2008) Anatomical profiling of G protein-coupled receptor expression. Cell 135, 561–571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Einstein R., Jordan H., Zhou W., Brenner M., Moses E. G., Liggett S. B. (2008) Alternative splicing of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily in human airway smooth muscle diversifies the complement of receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 5230–5235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Moore-Morris T., Varrault A., Mangoni M. E., Le Digarcher A., Negre V., Dantec C., Journot L., Nargeot J., Couette B. (2009) Identification of potential pharmacological targets by analysis of the comprehensive G protein-coupled receptor repertoire in the four cardiac chambers. Mol. Pharmacol. 75, 1108–1116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Swaney J. S., Roth D. M., Olson E. R., Naugle J. E., Meszaros J. G., Insel P. A. (2005) Inhibition of cardiac myofibroblast formation and collagen synthesis by activation and overexpression of adenylyl cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 437–442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lu D., Soleymani S., Madakshire R., Insel P. A. (2012) ATP released from cardiac fibroblasts via connexin hemichannels activates profibrotic P2Y2 receptors. FASEB J. 26, 2580–2591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yokoyama U., Minamisawa S., Adachi-Akahane S., Akaike T., Naguro I., Funakoshi K., Iwamoto M., Nakagome M., Uemura N., Hori H., Yokota S., Ishikawa Y. (2006) Multiple transcripts of Ca2+ channel alpha1-subunits and a novel spliced variant of the alpha1C-subunit in rat ductus arteriosus. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290, H1660–1670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sabri A., Short J., Guo J., Steinberg S. F. (2002) Protease-activated receptor-1-mediated DNA synthesis in cardiac fibroblast is via epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation: distinct PAR-1 signaling pathways in cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 91, 532–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Obreztchikova M., Elouardighi H., Ho M., Wilson B. A., Gertsberg Z., Steinberg S. F. (2006) Distinct signaling functions for Shc isoforms in the heart. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20197–20204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ozgen N., Obreztchikova M., Guo J., Elouardighi H., Dorn G. W., 2nd, Wilson B. A., Steinberg S. F. (2008) Protein kinase D links Gq-coupled receptors to cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-Ser133 phosphorylation in the heart. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17009–17019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Coughlin S. R. (2005) Protease-activated receptors in hemostasis, thrombosis and vascular biology. J. Thromb. Haemost. 3, 1800–1814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Steinberg S. F. (2005) The cardiovascular actions of protease-activated receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 67, 2–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Leger A. J., Covic L., Kuliopulos A. (2006) Protease-activated receptors in cardiovascular diseases. Circulation 114, 1070–1077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Coughlin S. R. (1999) How the protease thrombin talks to cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 11023–11027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ghosh A. K., Vaughan D. E. (2012) PAI-1 in tissue fibrosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 227, 493–507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jun J. I., Lau L. F. (2011) Taking aim at the extracellular matrix: CCN proteins as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 945–963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Leask A. (2010) Potential therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis: TGFbeta, angiotensin, endothelin, CCN2, and PDGF, partners in fibroblast activation. Circ. Res. 106, 1675–1680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yokoyama U., Patel H. H., Lai N. C., Aroonsakool N., Roth D. M., Insel P. A. (2008) The cyclic AMP effector Epac integrates pro- and anti-fibrotic signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 6386–6391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tomasek J. J., Gabbiani G., Hinz B., Chaponnier C., Brown R. A. (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 349–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dobaczewski M., Chen W., Frangogiannis N. G. (2011) Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling in cardiac remodeling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 51, 600–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gurtner G. C., Werner S., Barrandon Y., Longaker M. T. (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453, 314–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fiorucci S., Antonelli E., Distrutti E., Severino B., Fiorentina R., Baldoni M., Caliendo G., Santagada V., Morelli A., Cirino G. (2004) PAR1 antagonism protects against experimental liver fibrosis. Role of proteinase receptors in stellate cell activation. Hepatology 39, 365–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhang G., Kernan K. A., Collins S. J., Cai X., Lopez-Guisa J. M., Degen J. L., Shvil Y., Eddy A. A. (2007) Plasmin(ogen) promotes renal interstitial fibrosis by promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: role of plasmin-activated signals. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 846–859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chambers R. C. (2008) Procoagulant signalling mechanisms in lung inflammation and fibrosis: novel opportunities for pharmacological intervention? Br. J. Pharmacol. 153(Suppl. 1), S367–S378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sullivan B. P., Weinreb P. H., Violette S. M., Luyendyk J. P. (2010) The coagulation system contributes to alphaVbeta6 integrin expression and liver fibrosis induced by cholestasis. Am. J. Pathol. 177, 2837–2849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cevikbas F., Seeliger S., Fastrich M., Hinte H., Metze D., Kempkes C., Homey B., Steinhoff M. (2011) Role of protease-activated receptors in human skin fibrosis and scleroderma. Exp. Dermatol. 20, 69–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gellings Lowe N., Swaney J. S., Moreno K. M., Sabbadini R. A. (2009) Sphingosine-1-phosphate and sphingosine kinase are critical for transforming growth factor-beta-stimulated collagen production by cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc. Res. 82, 303–312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Laeremans H., Rensen S. S., Ottenheijm H. C., Smits J. F., Blankesteijn W. M. (2010) Wnt/frizzled signalling modulates the migration and differentiation of immortalized cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc. Res. 87, 514–523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Braun O. O., Lu D., Aroonsakool N., Insel P. A. (2010) Uridine triphosphate (UTP) induces profibrotic responses in cardiac fibroblasts by activation of P2Y2 receptors. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 49, 362–369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Russo A., Soh U. J., Trejo J. (2009) Proteases display biased agonism at protease-activated receptors: location matters. Mol. Interv. 9, 87–96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kishi K., Nakajima H., Tajima S. (1999) Differential responses of collagen and glycosaminoglycan syntheses and cell proliferation to exogenous transforming growth factor beta 1 in the developing mouse skin fibroblasts in culture. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 52, 579–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Insel P. A., Murray F., Yokoyama U., Romano S., Yun H., Brown L., Snead A., Lu D., Aroonsakool N. (2012) cAMP and Epac in the regulation of tissue fibrosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 166, 447–456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Strande J. L., Hsu A., Su J., Fu X., Gross G. J., Baker J. E. (2007) SCH 79797, a selective PAR1 antagonist, limits myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat hearts. Basic. Res. Cardiol. 102, 350–358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pawlinski R., Tencati M., Hampton C. R., Shishido T., Bullard T. A., Casey L. M., Andrade-Gordon P., Kotzsch M., Spring D., Luther T., Abe J., Pohlman T. H., Verrier E. D., Blaxall B. C., Mackman N. (2007) Protease-activated receptor-1 contributes to cardiac remodeling and hypertrophy. Circulation 116, 2298–2306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Baker J. E., Fish B. L., Su J., Haworth S. T., Strande J. L., Komorowski R. A., Migrino R. Q., Doppalapudi A., Harmann L., Allen Li X., Hopewell J. W., Moulder J. E. (2009) 10 Gy total body irradiation increases risk of coronary sclerosis, degeneration of heart structure and function in a rat model. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 85, 1089–1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The FASEB Journal are provided here courtesy of The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

RESOURCES