Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1986 May;83(9):2807–2811. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2807

Overlapping promoters and their control in Escherichia coli: the gal case.

M Herbert, A Kolb, H Buc
PMCID: PMC323395  PMID: 3010319

Abstract

Two overlapping promoters compete for RNA polymerase in the region that controls the expression of the galactose operon in Escherichia coli. Kinetics of open complex formation at P1 and P2 can be followed through the rate of formation of two specific abortive transcripts. The corresponding forward kinetic constants appear to be identical over a wide range of enzyme concentrations and temperatures, indicating that the two processes are strongly coupled. We propose a scheme accounting for our observations. In a first step, the competition between the two sites is a simple kinetic process, involving the "on" rate constants. In a second step, a slow reequilibration occurs, implicating the "off" rate constants and the conversion of one open complex to the other through a set of closed complexes. The first step is clearly affected when the complex between cyclic AMP and its receptor is bound at the activator site. An estimate of the various rate constants describing open complex formation at P1 and P2 is provided, as well as a qualitative description of the effect of the activator complex on these two pathways.

Full text

PDF
2807

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aiba H., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11905–11910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buc H., McClure W. R. Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps. Biochemistry. 1985 May 21;24(11):2712–2723. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Busby S., Aiba H., de Crombrugghe B. Mutations in the Escherichia coli operon that define two promoters and the binding site of the cyclic AMP receptor protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 15;154(2):211–227. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90061-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Busby S., Dreyfus M. Segment-specific mutagenesis of the regulatory region in the Escherichia coli galactose operon: isolation of mutations reducing the initiation of transcription and translation. Gene. 1983 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):121–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Busby S., Irani M., Crombrugghe B. Isolation of mutant promoters in the Escherichia coli galactose operon using local mutagenesis on cloned DNA fragments. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 15;154(2):197–209. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cech C. L., McClure W. R. Characterization of ribonucleic acid polymerase-T7 promoter binary complexes. Biochemistry. 1980 May 27;19(11):2440–2447. doi: 10.1021/bi00552a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chamberlin M. J. The selectivity of transcription. Annu Rev Biochem. 1974;43(0):721–775. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.43.070174.003445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DiLauro R., Taniguchi T., Musso R., de Crombrugghe B. Unusual location and function of the operator in the Escherichia coli galactose operon. Nature. 1979 Jun 7;279(5713):494–500. doi: 10.1038/279494a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hawley D. K., McClure W. R. Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 25;157(3):493–525. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawley D. K., McClure W. R. The effect of a lambda repressor mutation on the activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter. Cell. 1983 Feb;32(2):327–333. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90452-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hillen W., Schollmeier K., Gatz C. Control of expression of the Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance operon. II. Interaction of RNA polymerase and TET repressor with the tet operon regulatory region. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jan 15;172(2):185–201. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(84)80037-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lowe P. A., Hager D. A., Burgess R. R. Purification and properties of the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 1979 Apr 3;18(7):1344–1352. doi: 10.1021/bi00574a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malan T. P., Kolb A., Buc H., McClure W. R. Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 25;180(4):881–909. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90262-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Malan T. P., McClure W. R. Dual promoter control of the Escherichia coli lactose operon. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):173–180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maquat L. E., Reznikoff W. S. In vitro analysis of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase interaction with wild-type and mutant lactose promoters. J Mol Biol. 1978 Nov 15;125(4):467–490. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90311-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McClure W. R., Cech C. L., Johnston D. E. A steady state assay for the RNA polymerase initiation reaction. J Biol Chem. 1978 Dec 25;253(24):8941–8948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McClure W. R. Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:171–204. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.001131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McClure W. R. Rate-limiting steps in RNA chain initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):5634–5638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Musso R. E., Di Lauro R., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):847–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterson M. L., Reznikoff W. S. Properties of lac P2 in vivo and in vitro. An overlapping RNA polymerase binding site within the lactose promoter. J Mol Biol. 1985 Oct 5;185(3):535–543. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schaeffer F., Kolb A., Buc H. Point mutations change the thermal denaturation profile of a short DNA fragment containing the lactose control elements. Comparison between experiment and theory. EMBO J. 1982;1(1):99–105. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01131.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shanblatt S. H., Revzin A. Kinetics of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation: effects of nonspecific DNA-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 11;12(13):5287–5306. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.13.5287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spassky A., Busby S., Buc H. On the action of the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex at the Escherichia coli lactose and galactose promoter regions. EMBO J. 1984 Jan;3(1):43–50. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01759.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taniguchi T., de Crombrugghe B. Interactions of RNA polymerase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein on DNA of the E. coli galactose operon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 11;11(15):5165–5180. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.15.5165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tatti K. M., Moran C. P., Jr Utilization of one promoter by two forms of RNA polymerase from Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1985 Mar 14;314(6007):190–192. doi: 10.1038/314190a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES