Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Oct;16(10):5557–5571. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5557

Identification of seven hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 making redundant contributions to transcriptional activation.

B M Jackson 1, C M Drysdale 1, K Natarajan 1, A G Hinnebusch 1
PMCID: PMC231555  PMID: 8816468

Abstract

GCN4 is a transcriptional activator in the bZIP family that regulates amino acid biosynthetic genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal 100 amino acids of GCN4 contains a potent activation function that confers high-level transcription in the absence of the centrally located acidic activation domain (CAAD) delineated in previous studies. To identify specific amino acids important for activation by the N-terminal domain, we mutagenized a GCN4 allele lacking the CAAD and screened alleles in vivo for reduced expression of the HIS3 gene. We found four pairs of closely spaced phenylalanines and a leucine residue distributed throughout the N-terminal 100 residues of GCN4 that are required for high-level activation in the absence of the CAAD. Trp, Leu, and Tyr were highly functional substitutions for the Phe residue at position 45. Combined with our previous findings, these results indicate that GCN4 contains seven clusters of aromatic or bulky hydrophobic residues which make important contributions to transcriptional activation at HIS3. None of the seven hydrophobic clusters is essential for activation by full-length GCN4, and the critical residues in two or three clusters must be mutated simultaneously to observe a substantial reduction in GCN4 function. Numerous combinations of four or five intact clusters conferred high-level transcription of HIS3. We propose that many of the hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 act independently of one another to provide redundant means of stimulating transcription and that the functional contributions of these different segments are cumulative at the HIS3 promoter. On the basis of the primacy of bulky hydrophobic residues throughout the activation domain, we suggest that GCN4 contains multiple sites that mediate hydrophobic contacts with one or more components of the transcription initiation machinery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (531.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arndt K. M., Ricupero-Hovasse S., Winston F. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1490–1497. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07135.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baniahmad A., Ha I., Reinberg D., Tsai S., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Interaction of human thyroid hormone receptor beta with transcription factor TFIIB may mediate target gene derepression and activation by thyroid hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8832–8836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barettino D., Vivanco Ruiz M. M., Stunnenberg H. G. Characterization of the ligand-dependent transactivation domain of thyroid hormone receptor. EMBO J. 1994 Jul 1;13(13):3039–3049. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06603.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlev N. A., Candau R., Wang L., Darpino P., Silverman N., Berger S. L. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor, ADA2, with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 18;270(33):19337–19344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger S. L., Piña B., Silverman N., Marcus G. A., Agapite J., Regier J. L., Triezenberg S. J., Guarente L. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional adaptor required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):251–265. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90100-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blair W. S., Bogerd H. P., Madore S. J., Cullen B. R. Mutational analysis of the transcription activation domain of RelA: identification of a highly synergistic minimal acidic activation module. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7226–7234. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buratowski S. The basics of basal transcription by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90226-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cadwell R. C., Joyce G. F. Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis. PCR Methods Appl. 1992 Aug;2(1):28–33. doi: 10.1101/gr.2.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caron C., Rousset R., Béraud C., Moncollin V., Egly J. M., Jalinot P. Functional and biochemical interaction of the HTLV-I Tax1 transactivator with TBP. EMBO J. 1993 Nov;12(11):4269–4278. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chatterjee S., Struhl K. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):820–822. doi: 10.1038/374820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen J. L., Attardi L. D., Verrijzer C. P., Yokomori K., Tjian R. Assembly of recombinant TFIID reveals differential coactivator requirements for distinct transcriptional activators. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):93–105. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90403-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Choy B., Green M. R. Eukaryotic activators function during multiple steps of preinitiation complex assembly. Nature. 1993 Dec 9;366(6455):531–536. doi: 10.1038/366531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J. Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. Science. 1991 Jan 4;251(4989):87–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1846049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahlman-Wright K., Baumann H., McEwan I. J., Almlöf T., Wright A. P., Gustafsson J. A., Härd T. Structural characterization of a minimal functional transactivation domain from the human glucocorticoid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1699–1703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Drysdale C. M., Dueñas E., Jackson B. M., Reusser U., Braus G. H., Hinnebusch A. G. The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1220–1233. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellenberger T. E., Brandl C. J., Struhl K., Harrison S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted alpha helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell. 1992 Dec 24;71(7):1223–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ge H., Roeder R. G. Purification, cloning, and characterization of a human coactivator, PC4, that mediates transcriptional activation of class II genes. Cell. 1994 Aug 12;78(3):513–523. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90428-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Geisberg J. V., Lee W. S., Berk A. J., Ricciardi R. P. The zinc finger region of the adenovirus E1A transactivating domain complexes with the TATA box binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2488–2492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Georgakopoulos T., Gounalaki N., Thireos G. Genetic evidence for the interaction of the yeast transcriptional co-activator proteins GCN5 and ADA2. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Mar 20;246(6):723–728. doi: 10.1007/BF00290718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Georgakopoulos T., Thireos G. Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J. 1992 Nov;11(11):4145–4152. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gill G., Pascal E., Tseng Z. H., Tjian R. A glutamine-rich hydrophobic patch in transcription factor Sp1 contacts the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex and mediates transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):192–196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodrich J. A., Hoey T., Thut C. J., Admon A., Tjian R. Drosophila TAFII40 interacts with both a VP16 activation domain and the basal transcription factor TFIIB. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):519–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90386-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hagemeier C., Cook A., Kouzarides T. The retinoblastoma protein binds E2F residues required for activation in vivo and TBP binding in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Nov 11;21(22):4998–5004. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.22.4998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hardwick J. M., Tse L., Applegren N., Nicholas J., Veliuona M. A. The Epstein-Barr virus R transactivator (Rta) contains a complex, potent activation domain with properties different from those of VP16. J Virol. 1992 Sep;66(9):5500–5508. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.9.5500-5508.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hengartner C. J., Thompson C. M., Zhang J., Chao D. M., Liao S. M., Koleske A. J., Okamura S., Young R. A. Association of an activator with an RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 15;9(8):897–910. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.8.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hinnebusch A. G. Evidence for translational regulation of the activator of general amino acid control in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(20):6442–6446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.20.6442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinnebusch A. G., Fink G. R. Positive regulation in the general amino acid control of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(17):5374–5378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.17.5374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hope I. A., Struhl K. GCN4 protein, synthesized in vitro, binds HIS3 regulatory sequences: implications for general control of amino acid biosynthetic genes in yeast. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hope I. A., Struhl K. GCN4, a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, binds as a dimer to target DNA. EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2781–2784. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02573.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ingles C. J., Shales M., Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J., Greenblatt J. Reduced binding of TFIID to transcriptionally compromised mutants of VP16. Nature. 1991 Jun 13;351(6327):588–590. doi: 10.1038/351588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacq X., Brou C., Lutz Y., Davidson I., Chambon P., Tora L. Human TAFII30 is present in a distinct TFIID complex and is required for transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):107–117. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kashanchi F., Piras G., Radonovich M. F., Duvall J. F., Fattaey A., Chiang C. M., Roeder R. G., Brady J. N. Direct interaction of human TFIID with the HIV-1 transactivator tat. Nature. 1994 Jan 20;367(6460):295–299. doi: 10.1038/367295a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kerr L. D., Ransone L. J., Wamsley P., Schmitt M. J., Boyer T. G., Zhou Q., Berk A. J., Verma I. M. Association between proto-oncoprotein Rel and TATA-binding protein mediates transcriptional activation by NF-kappa B. Nature. 1993 Sep 30;365(6445):412–419. doi: 10.1038/365412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim T. K., Hashimoto S., Kelleher R. J., 3rd, Flanagan P. M., Kornberg R. D., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Effects of activation-defective TBP mutations on transcription initiation in yeast. Nature. 1994 May 19;369(6477):252–255. doi: 10.1038/369252a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim T. K., Roeder R. G. Proline-rich activator CTF1 targets the TFIIB assembly step during transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 10;91(10):4170–4174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Klages N., Strubin M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):822–823. doi: 10.1038/374822a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. The RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications for gene regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Mar;20(3):113–116. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88977-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee M., Struhl K. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5461–5469. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee W. S., Kao C. C., Bryant G. O., Liu X., Berk A. J. Adenovirus E1A activation domain binds the basic repeat in the TATA box transcription factor. Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):365–376. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin J., Chen J., Elenbaas B., Levine A. J. Several hydrophobic amino acids in the p53 amino-terminal domain are required for transcriptional activation, binding to mdm-2 and the adenovirus 5 E1B 55-kD protein. Genes Dev. 1994 May 15;8(10):1235–1246. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.10.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin Y. S., Green M. R. Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90321-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin Y. S., Ha I., Maldonado E., Reinberg D., Green M. R. Binding of general transcription factor TFIIB to an acidic activating region. Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):569–571. doi: 10.1038/353569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lu H., Levine A. J. Human TAFII31 protein is a transcriptional coactivator of the p53 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 23;92(11):5154–5158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.5154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Melcher K., Johnston S. A. GAL4 interacts with TATA-binding protein and coactivators. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 May;15(5):2839–2848. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.5.2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Metz R., Bannister A. J., Sutherland J. A., Hagemeier C., O'Rourke E. C., Cook A., Bravo R., Kouzarides T. c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6021–6029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Metz R., Kouzarides T., Bravo R. A C-terminal domain in FosB, absent in FosB/SF and Fra-1, which is able to interact with the TATA binding protein, is required for altered cell growth. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3832–3842. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06694.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moehle C. M., Hinnebusch A. G. Association of RAP1 binding sites with stringent control of ribosomal protein gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 May;11(5):2723–2735. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.5.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Narayan S., Widen S. G., Beard W. A., Wilson S. H. RNA polymerase II transcription. Rate of promoter clearance is enhanced by a purified activating transcription factor/cAMP response element-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 29;269(17):12755–12763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paluh J. L., Yanofsky C. Characterization of Neurospora CPC1, a bZIP DNA-binding protein that does not require aligned heptad leucines for dimerization. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):935–944. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Parent S. A., Fenimore C. M., Bostian K. A. Vector systems for the expression, analysis and cloning of DNA sequences in S. cerevisiae. Yeast. 1985 Dec;1(2):83–138. doi: 10.1002/yea.320010202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Peterson C. L., Tamkun J. W. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Apr;20(4):143–146. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88990-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Piña B., Berger S., Marcus G. A., Silverman N., Agapite J., Guarente L. ADA3: a gene, identified by resistance to GAL4-VP16, with properties similar to and different from those of ADA2. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):5981–5989. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.5981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Regier J. L., Shen F., Triezenberg S. J. Pattern of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids critical for one of two subdomains of the VP16 transcriptional activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 1;90(3):883–887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schmitz M. L., dos Santos Silva M. A., Altmann H., Czisch M., Holak T. A., Baeuerle P. A. Structural and functional analysis of the NF-kappa B p65 C terminus. An acidic and modular transactivation domain with the potential to adopt an alpha-helical conformation. J Biol Chem. 1994 Oct 14;269(41):25613–25620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Seipel K., Georgiev O., Schaffner W. A minimal transcription activation domain consisting of a specific array of aspartic acid and leucine residues. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1994 Jul;375(7):463–470. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1994.375.7.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shen F., Triezenberg S. J., Hensley P., Porter D., Knutson J. R. Critical amino acids in the transcriptional activation domain of the herpesvirus protein VP16 are solvent-exposed in highly mobile protein segments. An intrinsic fluorescence study. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 1;271(9):4819–4826. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.9.4819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shen F., Triezenberg S. J., Hensley P., Porter D., Knutson J. R. Transcriptional activation domain of the herpesvirus protein VP16 becomes conformationally constrained upon interaction with basal transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 1;271(9):4827–4837. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.9.4827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tanaka M., Herr W. Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6056–6067. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tavernarakis N., Thireos G. Transcriptional interference caused by GCN4 overexpression reveals multiple interactions mediating transcriptional activation. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Jun 10;247(5):571–578. doi: 10.1007/BF00290348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thut C. J., Chen J. L., Klemm R., Tjian R. p53 transcriptional activation mediated by coactivators TAFII40 and TAFII60. Science. 1995 Jan 6;267(5194):100–104. doi: 10.1126/science.7809597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tong X., Drapkin R., Reinberg D., Kieff E. The 62- and 80-kDa subunits of transcription factor IIH mediate the interaction with Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3259–3263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Walker S., Greaves R., O'Hare P. Transcriptional activation by the acidic domain of Vmw65 requires the integrity of the domain and involves additional determinants distinct from those necessary for TFIIB binding. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5233–5244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xiao H., Friesen J. D., Lis J. T. A highly conserved domain of RNA polymerase II shares a functional element with acidic activation domains of upstream transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7507–7516. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Xiao H., Friesen J. D., Lis J. T. Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5757–5761. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Xiao H., Pearson A., Coulombe B., Truant R., Zhang S., Regier J. L., Triezenberg S. J., Reinberg D., Flores O., Ingles C. J. Binding of basal transcription factor TFIIH to the acidic activation domains of VP16 and p53. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;14(10):7013–7024. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.7013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu X., Prorock C., Ishikawa H., Maldonado E., Ito Y., Gélinas C. Functional interaction of the v-Rel and c-Rel oncoproteins with the TATA-binding protein and association with transcription factor IIB. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;13(11):6733–6741. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.11.6733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yankulov K., Blau J., Purton T., Roberts S., Bentley D. L. Transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II is stimulated by transactivators. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):749–759. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES