Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):330–344. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.330

T-cell regulation of antibody responses: demonstration of allotype- specific helper T cells and their specific removal by suppressor T cells

PMCID: PMC2190372  PMID: 1085324

Abstract

Allotype suppressor T cells (Ts) generated in SJL X BALB/c mice specifically suppress production of antibodies marked with the Ig-1a allotype. The studies presented here show that allotypes Ts suppress by specifically removing helper T cell (Th) activity required to facilitate differentiation and expansion of B cells to Ig-1b antibody- forming cells. We show first that Ts and Th belong to different T-cell subclasses as defined by Ly surface antigens. Ts are Ly2+Lyl- and thus belong to the same subclass as cytotoxic precursor and effector cells; Th are Lyl+Ly2- cells and thus belong to the subclass containing cells which can exert helper functions and initiate delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Placing these cells in these two subclasses shows that Th are different from Ts and suggests that they play different roles in regulating antibody responses. The difference in these roles is defined by the evidence presented here showing that Ts attack Th and regulate the antibody response by specifically regulating the availability of Th activity. We show that in allotype suppressed mice, Ts which suppress Ig-1b antibody production have completely removed the Th activity of helping Ig-1b cells without impairing Th activity which helps other IgB B cells. These findings imply the existence of allotype-specific Th for Ig-1b cells (Ig-1b Th). We directly establish that Ig-1b cells require such help by showing that carrier-primed spleen cells from Iga/Iga congenic hybrids help Ig-1a B cells from hapten-primed Igb/Iga donors but do not help Ig-1b B cells from the same donor in the same adoptive recipient.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Basten A., Miller J. F., Johnson P. T cell-dependent suppression of an anti-hapten antibody response. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:130–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benacerraf B., Kapp J. A., Debré P., Pierce C. W., de la Croix F. The stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in genetic non-responder mice by linear random copolymers of L-amino acids. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:21–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cantor H., Boyse E. A. Functional subclasses of T lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. II. Cooperation between subclasses of Ly+ cells in the generation of killer activity. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1390–1399. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantor H., Boyse E. A. Functional subclasses of T-lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. I. The generation of functionally distinct T-cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1376–1389. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cantor H., Shen F. W., Boyse E. A. Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly components. II. Activation by antigen: after immunization, antigen-specific suppressor and helper activities are mediated by distinct T-cell subclasses. J Exp Med. 1976 Jun 1;143(6):1391–1340. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.6.1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Immune responses in vitro. I. Culture conditions for antibody synthesis. Cell Immunol. 1972 Feb;3(2):264–276. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eichmann K. Idiotype suppression. II. Amplification of a suppressor T cell with anti-idiotypic activity. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Aug;5(8):511–517. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gershon R. K. T cell control of antibody production. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1974;3:1–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3045-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HERZENBERG L. A. A CHROMOSOME REGION FOR GAMMA 2A AND BETA 2A GLOBULIN H CHAIN ISOANTIGENS IN THE MOUSE. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1964;29:455–462. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1964.029.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Short-term and chronic allotype suppression in mice. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1974;3:41–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3045-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herzenberg L. A., Okumura K., Metzler C. M. Regulation of immunoglobulin and antibody production by allotype suppressor T cells in mice. Transplant Rev. 1975;27:57–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jandinski J., Cantor H., Tadakuma T., Peavy D. L., Pierce C. W. Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly components. I. Polyclonal activation: suppressor and helper activities are inherent properties of distinct T-cell subclasses. J Exp Med. 1976 Jun 1;143(6):1382–1390. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.6.1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jerne N. K. The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Julius M. H., Simpson E., Herzenberg L. A. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):645–649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kapp J. A., Pierce C. W., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of immune responses in vitro. VI. Experimental conditions for the development of helper T-cell activity specific for the terpolymer L-glutamic aicd60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) in nonresponder mice. J Exp Med. 1975 Jul 1;142(1):50–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz D. H., Graves M., Dorf M. E., Dimuzio H., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. VII. Cooperative responses between lymphocytes are controlled by genes in the I region of the H-2 complex. J Exp Med. 1975 Jan 1;141(1):263–268. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kishimoto T., Ishizaka K. Regulation of antibody response in vitro. VI. Carrier-specific helper cells for IgG and IgE antibody response. J Immunol. 1973 Sep;111(3):720–732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Loken M. R., Herzenber L. A. Analysis of cell populations with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;254:163–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb29166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McDevitt H. O., Delovitch T. L., Press J. L., Murphy D. B. Genetic and functional analysis of the Ia antigens: their possible role in regulating the immune response. Transplant Rev. 1976;30:197–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1976.tb00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Okumura K., Metzler C. M., Tsu T. T., Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Two stages of B-cell memory development with different T-cell requirements. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):345–357. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Okumura K., Tada T. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. VI. Inhibitory effect of thymocytes on the homocytotropic antibody response. J Immunol. 1971 Dec;107(6):1682–1689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES