Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Jul 2;122(2):373–386. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.2.373

Components required for cytokinesis are important for bud site selection in yeast

PMCID: PMC2119637  PMID: 8320260

Abstract

Polarized cell division is a fundamental process that occurs in a variety of organisms; it is responsible for the proper positioning of daughter cells and the correct segregation of cytoplasmic components. The SPA2 gene of yeast encodes a nonessential protein that localizes to sites of cell growth and to the site of cytokinesis. spa2 mutants exhibit slightly altered budding patterns. In this report, a genetic screen was used to isolate a novel ochre allele of CDC10, cdc10-10; strains containing this mutation require the SPA2 gene for growth. CDC10 encodes a conserved potential GTP-binding protein that previously has been shown to localize to the bud neck and to be important for cytokinesis. The genetic interaction of cdc10-10 and spa2 suggests a role for SPA2 in cytokinesis. Most importantly, strains that contain a cdc10-10 mutation and those containing mutations affecting other putative neck filament proteins do not form buds at their normal proximal location. The finding that a component involved in cytokinesis is also important in bud site selection provides strong evidence for the cytokinesis tag model; i.e., critical components at the site of cytokinesis are involved in determining the next site of polarized growth and division.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bender A., Pringle J. R. Multicopy suppression of the cdc24 budding defect in yeast by CDC42 and three newly identified genes including the ras-related gene RSR1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9976–9980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender A., Pringle J. R. Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1295–1305. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bi E. F., Lutkenhaus J. FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1991 Nov 14;354(6349):161–164. doi: 10.1038/354161a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Botstein D., Falco S. C., Stewart S. E., Brennan M., Scherer S., Stinchcomb D. T., Struhl K., Davis R. W. Sterile host yeasts (SHY): a eukaryotic system of biological containment for recombinant DNA experiments. Gene. 1979 Dec;8(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(79)90004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chant J., Corrado K., Pringle J. R., Herskowitz I. Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with bud formation gene BEM1. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1213–1224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90016-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chant J., Herskowitz I. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1203–1212. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90015-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen D. C., Yang B. C., Kuo T. T. One-step transformation of yeast in stationary phase. Curr Genet. 1992 Jan;21(1):83–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00318659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Costigan C., Gehrung S., Snyder M. A synthetic lethal screen identifies SLK1, a novel protein kinase homolog implicated in yeast cell morphogenesis and cell growth. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1162–1178. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dever T. E., Glynias M. J., Merrick W. C. GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1814–1818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Egilmez N. K., Jazwinski S. M. Evidence for the involvement of a cytoplasmic factor in the aging of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1989 Jan;171(1):37–42. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.1.37-42.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ford S. K., Pringle J. R. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC11 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. Dev Genet. 1991;12(4):281–292. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020120405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gehrung S., Snyder M. The SPA2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for pheromone-induced morphogenesis and efficient mating. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1451–1464. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodman H. M., Olson M. V., Hall B. D. Nucleotide sequence of a mutant eukaryotic gene: the yeast tyrosine-inserting ochre suppressor SUP4-o. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5453–5457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haarer B. K., Lillie S. H., Adams A. E., Magdolen V., Bandlow W., Brown S. S. Purification of profilin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and analysis of profilin-deficient cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):105–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haarer B. K., Pringle J. R. Immunofluorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm filaments in the mother-bud neck. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3678–3687. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartwell L. H. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Dec;69(2):265–276. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90223-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hieter P., Mann C., Snyder M., Davis R. W. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):381–392. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyman A. A. Centrosome movement in the early divisions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position. J Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;109(3):1185–1193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hyman A. A., Stearns T. Spindle positioning and cell polarity. Curr Biol. 1992 Sep;2(9):469–471. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(92)90660-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hyman A. A., White J. G. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2123–2135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson L. M., Snyder M., Chang L. M., Davis R. W., Campbell J. L. Isolation of the gene encoding yeast DNA polymerase I. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):369–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnston G. C., Prendergast J. A., Singer R. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MYO2 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial transport of vesicles. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(3):539–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim H. B., Haarer B. K., Pringle J. R. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):535–544. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koch E. A., Smith P. A., King R. C. The division and differentiation of Drosophila cystocytes. J Morphol. 1967 Jan;121(1):55–70. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051210106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lutz D. A., Hamaguchi Y., Inoué S. Micromanipulation studies of the asymmetric positioning of the maturation spindle in Chaetopterus sp. oocytes: I. Anchorage of the spindle to the cortex and migration of a displaced spindle. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;11(2):83–96. doi: 10.1002/cm.970110202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Madden K., Costigan C., Snyder M. Cell polarity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;2(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(92)90140-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Madden K., Snyder M. Specification of sites for polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the influence of external factors on site selection. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Sep;3(9):1025–1035. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.9.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mortimer R. K., Schild D. Genetic map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, edition 9. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Sep;49(3):181–213. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.3.181-213.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nottenburg C., Gallatin W. M., St John T. Lymphocyte HEV adhesion variants differ in the expression of multiple gene sequences. Gene. 1990 Nov 15;95(2):279–284. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Page B. D., Snyder M. Chromosome segregation in yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:231–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.001311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. RayChaudhuri D., Park J. T. Escherichia coli cell-division gene ftsZ encodes a novel GTP-binding protein. Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):251–254. doi: 10.1038/359251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saiki R. K., Gelfand D. H., Stoffel S., Scharf S. J., Higuchi R., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saiki R. K., Scharf S., Faloona F., Mullis K. B., Horn G. T., Erlich H. A., Arnheim N. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.2999980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shaw K. J., Olson M. V. Effects of altered 5'-flanking sequences on the in vivo expression of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNATyr gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;4(4):657–665. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sloat B. F., Adams A., Pringle J. R. Roles of the CDC24 gene product in cellular morphogenesis during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jun;89(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Snyder M., Davis R. W. SPA1: a gene important for chromosome segregation and other mitotic functions in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1988 Sep 9;54(6):743–754. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90977-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Snyder M., Gehrung S., Page B. D. Studies concerning the temporal and genetic control of cell polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):515–532. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Snyder M. The SPA2 protein of yeast localizes to sites of cell growth. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1419–1429. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Steensma H. Y., van der Aart Q. J. Sequence of the CDC10 region at chromosome III of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1991 May-Jun;7(4):425–429. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Strome S. Determination of cleavage planes. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):3–6. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90041-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vojtek A., Haarer B., Field J., Gerst J., Pollard T. D., Brown S., Wigler M. Evidence for a functional link between profilin and CAP in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):497–505. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. de Boer P., Crossley R., Rothfield L. The essential bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ is a GTPase. Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):254–256. doi: 10.1038/359254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES