Abstract
An optical technique for measuring the thickness of thin films has been adapted and evaluated for studying the structure of the adhesion of cells to glass in tissue culture. This technique, which is termed interference reflection microscopy, has been used to study embryonic chick heart fibroblasts. These findings have been observed: in normal culture medium the closest approach of the cell surface to substrate in its adhesions is ca. 100 A, much of the cell surface lying farther away; chemical treatments which bring the cell surface to near its charge reversal point reduce the closest approach of adhesions to <50 A, probably to <30 A; chemical treatments which increase surface charge increase the nearest approach of cell and substrate in adhesions from ca. 100 A; high osmotic concentration of a non-polar substance, i.e. sucrose, does not affect the distance between cell and substrate in the adhesions. In addition, optical evidence indicates that there is no extracellular material between cell and glass in the adhesions. When cells de-adhere from glass, they appear not to leave fragments behind. The adhesive sites in these fibroblasts appear to be confined to the edge of the side of the cell facing the substrate and to the pseudopods. The significance of this is discussed in relation to the phenomenon of contact inhibition. Evidence is presented that the mechanism of cell adhesion does not involve calcium atoms binding cells to substrate by combining with carboxyl groups on cell surface, substrate, and with a cement substance. Osmium tetroxide fixation results in a final separation of 100 to 200 A between cell and substrate: there are reasons for thinking that this fairly close approach to the condition in life is produced as an artefact. The results can be accounted for only in terms of the action of electrostatic repulsive forces and an attractive force, probably the van der Waals—London forces. Biological arguments suggest that these results are equally applicable for cell-to-cell adhesions.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AMBROSE E. J., JONES P. C. Surface-contact microscopy. Studies in cell movements. Med Biol Illus. 1961 Apr;11:104–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CURTIS A. S. Cell contact and adhesion. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1962 Feb;37:82–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1962.tb01605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CURTIS A. S. EFFECT OF PH AND TEMPERATURE ON CELL RE-AGGREGATION. Nature. 1963 Dec 21;200:1235–1236. doi: 10.1038/2001235b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HEARD D. H., SEAMAN G. V. The influence of pH and ionic strength on the electrokinetic stability of the human erythrocyte membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Jan;43:635–654. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.3.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEESON T. S., KALANT H. Effects of in vivo decalcification on ultrastructure of adult rat liver. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 May;10:95–104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PETHICA B. A. The physical chemistry of cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res. 1961;Suppl 8:123–140. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RAPPAPORT C., POOLE J. P., RAPPAPORT H. P. Studies on properties of surfaces required for growth of mammalian cells in synthetic medium. I. The HeLa cell. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Sep;20:465–479. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROBERTSON J. D. Structural alterations in nerve fibers produced by hypotonic and hypertonic solutions. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Jul 25;4(4):349–364. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.4.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SEAMAN G. V., HEARD D. H. The surface of the washed human erythrocyte as a polyanion. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Nov;44:251–268. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]