Abstract
Sequence variation was sampled in cultivated and related wild forms of tomato at fw2.2--a fruit weight QTL key to the evolution of domesticated tomatoes. Variation at fw2.2 was contrasted with variation at four other loci not involved in fruit weight determination. Several conclusions could be reached: (1) Fruit weight variation attributable to fw2.2 is not caused by variation in the FW2.2 protein sequence; more likely, it is due to transcriptional variation associated with one or more of eight nucleotide changes unique to the promoter of large-fruit alleles; (2) fw2.2 and loci not involved in fruit weight have not evolved at distinguishably different rates in cultivated and wild tomatoes, despite the fact that fw2.2 was likely a target of selection during domestication; (3) molecular-clock-based estimates suggest that the large-fruit allele of fw2.2, now fixed in most cultivated tomatoes, arose in tomato germplasm long before domestication; (4) extant accessions of L. esculentum var. cerasiforme, the subspecies thought to be the most likely wild ancestor of domesticated tomatoes, appear to be an admixture of wild and cultivated tomatoes rather than a transitional step from wild to domesticated tomatoes; and (5) despite the fact that cerasiforme accessions are polymorphic for large- and small-fruit alleles at fw2.2, no significant association was detected between fruit size and fw2.2 genotypes in the subspecies--as tested by association genetic studies in the relatively small sample studied--suggesting the role of other fruit weight QTL in fruit weight variation in cerasiforme.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (195.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aquadro C. F., Desse S. F., Bland M. M., Langley C. H., Laurie-Ahlberg C. C. Molecular population genetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1165–1190. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernatzky R., Tanksley S. D. Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):887–898. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boerwinkle E., Visvikis S., Welsh D., Steinmetz J., Hanash S. M., Sing C. F. The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. II. The role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining levels, variability, and covariability of cholesterol, betalipoprotein, and triglycerides in a sample of unrelated individuals. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Jul;27(3):567–582. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320270310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bucher P. Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 20;212(4):563–578. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90223-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K. A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000 Oct;9(10):1657–1659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doebley J., Stec A., Hubbard L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):485–488. doi: 10.1038/386485a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewing B., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M. C., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):175–185. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frary A., Nesbitt T. C., Grandillo S., Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J., Meller J., Elber R., Alpert K. B., Tanksley S. D. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000 Jul 7;289(5476):85–88. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ku H. M., Vision T., Liu J., Tanksley S. D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):9121–9126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160271297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClean P. E., Hanson M. R. Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Divergence among Lycopersicon and Related Solanum Species. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):649–667. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milanesi L., Muselli M., Arrigo P. Hamming-Clustering method for signals prediction in 5' and 3' regions of eukaryotic genes. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Oct;12(5):399–404. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.5.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer J. D., Zamir D. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(16):5006–5010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.16.5006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S., Tanksley S. D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):181–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prestridge D. S. Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 23;249(5):923–932. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proutski V., Holmes E. SWAN: sliding window analysis of nucleotide sequence variability. Bioinformatics. 1998 Jun;14(5):467–468. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rick C. M., Zobel R. W., Fobes J. F. Four peroxidase Loci in red-fruited tomato species: genetics and geographic distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):835–839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.3.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tajima F. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):599–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Templeton A. R., Boerwinkle E., Sing C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):343–351. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R. L., Stec A., Hey J., Lukens L., Doebley J. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature. 1999 Mar 18;398(6724):236–239. doi: 10.1038/18435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M. W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211–2220. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams C. E., Clair D. A. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome. 1993 Jun;36(3):619–630. doi: 10.1139/g93-083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]