Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1978 Feb;88(2):285–303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.2.285

Characterization of Temperature-Sensitive, Fertilization-Defective Mutants of the Nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

Samuel Ward 1, Johji Miwa 1
PMCID: PMC1213801  PMID: 580424

Abstract

The isolation and characterization of three Caenorhabditis elegans temperature-sensitive mutants that are defective at fertilization are described. All three are alleles of the gene fer-1. At the restrictive temperature of 25°, mutant hermaphrodites make sperm and oocytes in normal numbers. No oocytes are fertilized, although they pass through the spermatheca and uterus normally. The oocytes can be fertilized by sperm transferred by wild-type males, indicating that the mutant defect is in the sperm. The temperature-sensitive period for the mutants coincides with spermatogenesis. Sperm made by mutants at 25° cannot be distinguished from wild-type sperm by light microscopy. The sperm do contact oocytes in mutant hermaphrodites, but do not fertilize. Mutant sperm appear to be nonmotile. Mutant males are also sterile when grown at 25°. They transfer normal numbers of sperm to hermaphrodites at mating, but these sperm fail to migrate to the spermatheca and are infertile. The phenotype of these mutants is consistent with a primary defect in sperm motility, but the cause of this defect is not known.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beams H. W., Sekhon S. S. Cytodifferentiation during spermiogenesis in Rhabditis pellio. J Ultrastruct Res. 1972 Mar;38(5):511–527. doi: 10.1016/0022-5320(72)90088-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Klass M., Wolf N., Hirsh D. Development of the male reproductive system and sexual transformation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1976 Aug;52(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewis J. A., Hodgkin J. A. Specific neuroanatomical changes in chemosensory mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol. 1977 Apr 1;172(3):489–510. doi: 10.1002/cne.901720306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sulston J. E. Post-embryonic development in the ventral cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 Aug 10;275(938):287–297. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1976.0084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Suzuki D. T. Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1970 Nov 13;170(3959):695–706. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3959.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vanderslice R., Hirsh D. Temperature-sensitive zygote defective mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1976 Mar;49(1):236–249. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ward S. Chemotaxis by the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: identification of attractants and analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):817–821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES