Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Nov;147(3):1017–1024. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1017

A Role for Rev3 in Mutagenesis during Double-Strand Break Repair in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

S L Holbeck 1, J N Strathern 1
PMCID: PMC1208230  PMID: 9383049

Abstract

Recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), traditionally believed to be an error-free DNA repair pathway, was recently shown to increase the frequency of mutations in a nearby interval. The reversion rate of trp1 alleles (either nonsense or frameshift mutations) near an HO-endonuclease cleavage site is increased at least 100-fold among cells that have experienced an HO-mediated DSB. We report here that in strains deleted for rev3 this DSB-associated reversion of a nonsense mutation was greatly decreased. Thus REV3, which encodes a subunit of the translesion DNA polymerase &, was responsible for the majority of these base substitution errors near a DSB. However, rev3 strains showed no decrease in HO-stimulated recombination, implying that another DNA polymerase also functioned in recombinational repair of a DSB. Reversion of trp1 frameshift alleles near a DSB was not reduced in rev3 strains, indicating that another polymerase could act during DSB repair to make these frameshift errors. Analysis of spontaneous reversion in haploid strains suggested that Rev3p had a greater role in making point mutations than in frameshift mutations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (858.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Wood R. D. Repair of UV-damaged DNA by mammalian cells and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):212–220. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Cao L., Kleckner N. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):541–545. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bebenek K., Beard W. A., Casas-Finet J. R., Kim H. R., Darden T. A., Wilson S. H., Kunkel T. A. Reduced frameshift fidelity and processivity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase mutants containing alanine substitutions in helix H of the thumb subdomain. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 18;270(33):19516–19523. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Foster P. L., Cairns J. Mechanisms of directed mutation. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):783–789. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frank E. G., Hauser J., Levine A. S., Woodgate R. Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8169–8173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedberg E. C. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):70–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.70-102.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R. A., Schiestl R. H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1425–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris R. S., Longerich S., Rosenberg S. M. Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science. 1994 Apr 8;264(5156):258–260. doi: 10.1126/science.8146657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jensen R. E., Herskowitz I. Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:97–104. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson L. M., Snyder M., Chang L. M., Davis R. W., Campbell J. L. Isolation of the gene encoding yeast DNA polymerase I. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):369–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keeney S., Giroux C. N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):375–384. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kunkel T. A., Resnick M. A., Gordenin D. A. Mutator specificity and disease: looking over the FENce. Cell. 1997 Jan 24;88(2):155–158. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81832-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Larimer F. W., Perry J. R., Hardigree A. A. The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis. J Bacteriol. 1989 Jan;171(1):230–237. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.1.230-237.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lawrence C. W., O'Brien T., Bond J. UV-induced reversion of his4 frameshift mutations in rad6, rev1, and rev3 mutants of yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(3):487–490. doi: 10.1007/BF00341451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leach F. S., Nicolaides N. C., Papadopoulos N., Liu B., Jen J., Parsons R., Peltomäki P., Sistonen P., Aaltonen L. A., Nyström-Lahti M. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1215–1225. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90330-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu Y., Alarcon C. M., Hall T., Reddy L. V., Donelson J. E. A strand bias occurs in point mutations associated with variant surface glycoprotein gene conversion in Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3971–3980. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lu Y., Hall T., Gay L. S., Donelson J. E. Point mutations are associated with a gene duplication leading to the bloodstream reexpression of a trypanosome metacyclic VSG. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90116-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McGill C. B., Shafer B. K., Higgins D. R., Strathern J. N. Analysis of interchromosomal mitotic recombination. Curr Genet. 1990 Jul;18(1):29–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00321112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morrison A., Christensen R. B., Alley J., Beck A. K., Bernstine E. G., Lemontt J. F., Lawrence C. W. REV3, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene whose function is required for induced mutagenesis, is predicted to encode a nonessential DNA polymerase. J Bacteriol. 1989 Oct;171(10):5659–5667. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.10.5659-5667.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuberger M. S., Milstein C. Somatic hypermutation. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995 Apr;7(2):248–254. doi: 10.1016/0952-7915(95)80010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Parsons R., Li G. M., Longley M. J., Fang W. H., Papadopoulos N., Jen J., de la Chapelle A., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., Modrich P. Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1227–1236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90331-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rajagopalan M., Lu C., Woodgate R., O'Donnell M., Goodman M. F., Echols H. Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10777–10781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ripley L. S., Glickman B. W., Shoemaker N. B. Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;189(1):113–117. doi: 10.1007/BF00326062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roche H., Gietz R. D., Kunz B. A. Specificity of the yeast rev3 delta antimutator and REV3 dependency of the mutator resulting from a defect (rad1 delta) in nucleotide excision repair. Genetics. 1994 Jul;137(3):637–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steele D. F., Jinks-Robertson S. An examination of adaptive reversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):9–21. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang Z., Wu X., Friedberg E. C. DNA repair synthesis during base excision repair in vitro is catalyzed by DNA polymerase epsilon and is influenced by DNA polymerases alpha and delta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;13(2):1051–1058. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES