Select a subgroup characteristic from the drop-down menu below to view relevant text and figures.
!Interpret data with caution. The coefficient of variation (CV) for this estimate is between 30 and 50 percent.
NOTE: Percentages are for students who earned any Carnegie credits. The Carnegie unit is a standard of measurement that represents one credit for the completion of a 1-year course. Only calculus courses that public and private high school graduates completed and earned credits for are included in the measures. For a high school graduate to be included in the analyses, their transcript had to meet five requirements: (1) the graduate received either a standard or honors diploma, (2) the transcript had three or more years of delineated courses, (3) at least one course on the transcript was taken during the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and High School Transcript Study (HSTS) assessment year, (4) the transcript contained 16 or more Carnegie credits, and (5) the transcript contained more than zero Carnegie credit in English courses. Although rounded numbers are displayed, figures are based on unrounded data.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2019 High School Transcript Study (HSTS). See Digest of Education Statistics 2021, table 225.46.
NOTE: Percentages are for students who earned any Carnegie credits. The Carnegie unit is a standard of measurement that represents one credit for the completion of a 1-year course. For a high school graduate to be included in the analyses, their transcript had to meet five requirements: (1) the graduate received either a standard or honors diploma, (2) the transcript had three or more years of delineated courses, (3) at least one course on the transcript was taken during the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and High School Transcript Study (HSTS) assessment year, (4) the transcript contained 16 or more Carnegie credits, and (5) the transcript contained more than zero Carnegie credit in English courses. Although rounded numbers are displayed, figures are based on unrounded data.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2019 High School Transcript Study (HSTS). See Digest of Education Statistics 2021, table 225.46.
NOTE: Percentages are for students who took any dual enrollment course. The Carnegie unit is a standard of measurement that represents one credit for the completion of a 1-year course. Dual enrollment courses may include college-level academic courses taught either at the high school or at a local college, advanced career/technical education courses that count for credit at vocational colleges and/or trade schools, and high school-level academic courses that count for credit at liberal arts or community colleges. For a high school graduate to be included in the analyses, their transcript had to meet five requirements: (1) the graduate received either a standard or honors diploma, (2) the transcript had three or more years of delineated courses, (3) at least one course on the transcript was taken during the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and High School Transcript Study (HSTS) assessment year, (4) the transcript contained 16 or more Carnegie credits, and (5) the transcript contained more than zero Carnegie credit in English courses. Although rounded numbers are displayed, the figures are based on unrounded data.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2019 High School Transcript Study (HSTS). See Digest of Education Statistics 2021, table 225.65.
1 Please visit the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)’s Education Across America website for the definitions of locale and sublocale.
2 Unless otherwise noted, total estimates include the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
3 The NAEP HSTS classifies STEM courses into one of three course types: (1) STEM advanced mathematics–algebra II, precalculus, analysis, calculus, and other advanced mathematics courses; (2) STEM advanced science and engineering–advanced environmental science, advanced biology, chemistry, physics, and engineering; and (3) STEM-related technical–engineering and science technology, health science and technology, and computer science.
4 Wang, X. (2013). Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5): 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622.
5 Black, S.E., Muller, C., Spitz-Oener, A., He, Z., Hung, K., and Warren, J.R. (2021). The Importance of STEM: High School Knowledge, Skills and Occupations in an Era of Growing Inequality. Research Policy, 50(7), Article 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104249.
6 Carnevale, A.P., Smith, N., and Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/stem/.
7 Commission on STEM Education. (2018). Charting a Course for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education. National Science & Technology Council. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590474.pdf.
8 For a high school graduate to be included in the analyses of this indicator, their transcript had to meet five requirements: (1) the graduate received either a standard or honors diploma, (2) the transcript had 3 or more years of delineated courses, (3) at least one course on the transcript was taken during the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and High School Transcript Study (HSTS) assessment year, (4) the transcript contained 16 or more Carnegie credits, and (5) the transcript contained more than zero Carnegie credit in English courses. The Carnegie unit is a standard of measurement that represents one credit for the completion of a 1-year course.
9 Courses that public and private high school graduates completed and earned credits for are included in the measures.
10 Allen, D., and Dadgar, M. (2012). Does Dual Enrollment Increase Students’ Success in College? Evidence From a Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Dual Enrollment in New York City. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(158): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20010
11 Kremer, K.P. (2020). Predictors of College Success Outcomes in Emerging Adults: The Role of High School Dual Enrollment Courses. Emerging Adulthood, 10(1): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820916639
12 Gagnon, D., Liu, J., and Cherasaro, T. (2021). Understanding Access to and Participation in Dual Enrollment by Locale and Income Level (REL 2021–089). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=REL2021089.
13 In 2019, the percentage of high school graduates who had taken a dual enrollment course in world language and literature was not measurably different between rural areas and other locales for which data were available.