Linux Journal shuts down
The simple fact is that we’ve run out of money, and options along with it. We never had a wealthy corporate parent or deep pockets of our own, and that made us an anomaly among publishers, from start to finish. While we got to be good at flying close to the ground for a long time, we lost what little elevation we had in November, when the scale finally tipped irrevocably to the negative." Linux Journal was out there tracking what was happening in our community long before anybody else; it will be missed.
Posted Dec 1, 2017 19:57 UTC (Fri)
by kay (subscriber, #1362)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Dec 3, 2017 3:02 UTC (Sun)
by jcm (subscriber, #18262)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Dec 8, 2017 19:39 UTC (Fri)
by solarion (subscriber, #112402)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 8, 2017 20:19 UTC (Fri)
by jcm (subscriber, #18262)
[Link]
Posted Dec 5, 2017 12:55 UTC (Tue)
by xjtuwjp (subscriber, #91330)
[Link]
Posted Dec 1, 2017 20:11 UTC (Fri)
by amacater (subscriber, #790)
[Link]
Posted Dec 1, 2017 20:12 UTC (Fri)
by ArgylePwnage (subscriber, #110409)
[Link] (16 responses)
Posted Dec 1, 2017 20:28 UTC (Fri)
by bcrl (guest, #5934)
[Link] (15 responses)
Posted Dec 1, 2017 20:39 UTC (Fri)
by halla (subscriber, #14185)
[Link]
I'm so down that I recycled my paper copies of LJ some years ago...
It was LJ that brought me into touch with Qt, which is the single most important free software toolkit in existence, it was LJ that was, to me, the successor to Byte, but for the past years, I never ever glimpsed even a glimmer of relevance in their website.
Posted Dec 1, 2017 21:05 UTC (Fri)
by zlynx (guest, #2285)
[Link] (13 responses)
Posted Dec 1, 2017 22:09 UTC (Fri)
by dc123 (guest, #117760)
[Link]
TIA
Posted Dec 1, 2017 22:14 UTC (Fri)
by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75)
[Link] (10 responses)
Sadly, giving subscribers a free download of their whole archive doesn't give anyone else the right to share it.
Posted Dec 2, 2017 0:45 UTC (Sat)
by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
[Link]
http://m.linuxjournal.com/article/6240
Authors who still have their original work can protect it by finding some project documentation where it's a good fit and submitting it.
Posted Dec 2, 2017 7:32 UTC (Sat)
by WolfWings (subscriber, #56790)
[Link] (8 responses)
http://lj.mybigcommerce.com/linux-journal-archive-1994-2017/
I've purchased it and can confirm it works fine at the moment at least.
Posted Dec 2, 2017 16:03 UTC (Sat)
by halla (subscriber, #14185)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 11, 2017 16:12 UTC (Mon)
by cavok (subscriber, #33216)
[Link]
Thanks for all the fish.
Posted Dec 3, 2017 19:09 UTC (Sun)
by salimma (subscriber, #34460)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 3, 2017 20:32 UTC (Sun)
by Thomas (subscriber, #39963)
[Link]
Posted Dec 4, 2017 13:18 UTC (Mon)
by przemoc (guest, #67594)
[Link] (3 responses)
Just downloaded it and to be honest I hoped for PDFs, because HTML/Web publishing doesn't produce as nicely typed or laid out documents as what is usually prepared for print. Sadly, all images are low resolution (and with even smaller duplicates, which I find quite wasteful). Cover images are actually tiny: 162x217. But at least text is text and it's there.
To sum it up, the archive is not some great bargain, but I find the price ($12) to be rather fair for what you can find in their zip. And I hope that by buying it I helped them even if very tiny bit.
All past efforts of LJ crew are appreciated and I wish them good luck with whatever they're doing presently or will be doing in future.
Posted Dec 4, 2017 14:10 UTC (Mon)
by geert (subscriber, #98403)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Dec 7, 2017 18:24 UTC (Thu)
by amk (subscriber, #19)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 14, 2017 14:19 UTC (Thu)
by geert (subscriber, #98403)
[Link]
Posted Dec 3, 2017 23:11 UTC (Sun)
by mdolan (subscriber, #104340)
[Link]
Posted Dec 1, 2017 22:53 UTC (Fri)
by unixbhaskar (guest, #44758)
[Link]
Posted Dec 2, 2017 4:51 UTC (Sat)
by ccchips (subscriber, #3222)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 2, 2017 13:14 UTC (Sat)
by amacater (subscriber, #790)
[Link]
Taking out a new subscription wouldn't help, sadly. Thanks to all the contributors over the years who've made it so worthwhile.
Posted Dec 4, 2017 13:08 UTC (Mon)
by tomponline (subscriber, #120053)
[Link]
Posted Dec 5, 2017 0:13 UTC (Tue)
by dsommers (subscriber, #55274)
[Link]
Later on I wanted to subscribe, but only the digital subscription was available. I did that as well and subscribed for a couple of years. But I don't know if I had grown out of their format - or if they had lost their good path - or both. I honestly thought the quality much lower than in the "old days". And with column promoting non-FOSS software and solutions. Advertisement for various non-Free products. I honestly felt they had forgotten where Linux came from. And whenever there was some editorial articles, it had a strong focus on Ubuntu primarily. When I realized I more generally read Reuven M. Lerners, Dave Taylor, Kyle Rankins and occasionally Doc Searls (and earlier days also Mick Bauers) articles and skipped the rest; I didn't find it worth the subscription. Those three first ones are the primary reason I extended my subscription the last time.
It's sad to see it go; as I truly learnt a lot in the early days and it would be good if they had found a new path forward. But I'm also not surprised it goes away. I did buy a copy of the last archive though; mostly due to nostalgic reasons and the price was fair (I already had an older archive so I mostly knew what I would get). Skimming through the issues, it is depressing to see how much LJ in many regards did not move much forward. It is those I've already mentioned who to me had some consistent path forward. Some of the more guest articles were great too, of course, but most of them didn't catch my field of interest too often.
And just to pile up on this non-FOSS attitude of LJ. The web server provided on the archive is based on a proprietary product (FlyingAnt CD web server by Wrensoft). Is it truly that hard to make something similar using Python or node.js (or whatever) together with SQLite? Okay, I get that cross-platform can be a bit more daunting. But still, why not stay true to the roots of where Linux came from; the free open source communities? I'm quite sure several of their regular article writers could handle such a challenge.
I hope we will see some new magazine(s) appearing, with new ideas and new spirit, to follow up on the new tech within the FOSS landscape. And LWN.net will hopefully stay around for a long time forward, as their work is something I do appreciate.
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
LWN is it now for intelligence and timely information on Linux. (ex)-subscriber and sad person
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
artistic immortality
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
In addition, current subscribers can download all issues since April 2005 in PDF,
and all issues since September 2011 in EPUB and MOBI.
(Personally, I've never used the latter two formats, but storage is cheap, and AMANDA is my friend ;-)
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
The Linux Journal shuts down
Linux Journal shuts down
Linux Journal shuts down
Linux Journal shuts down
Linux Journal shuts down
Linux Journal shuts down