Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been widely investigated, but a generally accepted theoretical framework does not yet exist. This paper argues that the idiosyncrasies of large firms and SMEs explains the different approaches to CSR, and that the notion of social capital is a more useful way of understanding the CSR approach of SMEs, whereas stakeholder theory more closely addresses the CSR approach of large firms. Based on the extant literature, we present a comparison of large firm and SME idiosyncrasies suggesting that both consolidated and emerging strategic orientations toward responsible behaviours exist. Idiosyncrasies of large firms and SMEs are also discussed to provide an assessment of the firm’s strategic CSR orientation, suggesting the key drivers upon which CSR strategies must be based. A twofold consideration emerges. First, the CSR–SME relationship could be better explained if the notion of social capital is taken into account, but this should also be accompanied by a stakeholder view of the SME; second, social capital and stakeholder theory should be taken as alternative ways of explaining CSR in both large firms and SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, R. W. 1975, The Social Challenge to Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. doi:10.2307/4134367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, L., & Easton, G.1999. “A Relational Resource Perspective on Social Capital”, in R.T.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (ed.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Kluwer, Boston, MA), pp. 68-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361–379. doi:10.2307/2098345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.P. 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & King, J. (1982). Small Business Ethics: Influences and Perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management, 20(1), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992, Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi:10.2307/257850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R. (2000). Ethical Issues in International Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Dyadic Examination. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 191–208. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00016-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. (2002a). Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Relationships. Transportation Research, Part E, 38E(1), 37–52. doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00008-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. (2002b). Logistics Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. 2001, Green Paper Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC.2002, European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC.2006, Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on CSR (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.M. 1939, Social Control of Business (McGraw Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95–120. doi:10.1086/228943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. 1990, Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Blackburn, R.1994, Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy? (Paul Chapman, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., Rutherfoord, R., & Lloyd Smith, S. (2000). Is There a Business Community?: Explaining the Non-Participation of Small Business in Local Economic Development. Local Economy, 15(2), 128–143. doi:10.1080/02690940050122686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322. doi:10.2307/255331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W. (1991). Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 23–51. doi:10.2307/3857591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G. (2004). “Global Competition and Corporate Responsibilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 14(1), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E.R. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., D. Laibson and B. Sacerdote: 2000, The Economic Approach to Social Capital. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA, p. 7728.

  • Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and Instruments for Organising CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60. doi:10.1023/A:1026240912016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic-Action and Social-Structure – the Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. 2004, “How CSR Contribute to the Competitiveness of Europe in a More Sustainable World”, The World Bank Institute and the CSR Resource Centre (Netherlands), 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280. doi:10.1177/000765030003900302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., H.P. Meister and R. Schmidpeter: 2001, Corporate Citizenship as Investing in Social Capital (Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasnas, J. (1998). The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T.W. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2004). A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, T.J. 1940, Measurement of the Social Performance of Business (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 251–273. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9183-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M.J., & Brown, M.E. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9038-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, H.G., & Wallich, H.C.1972, The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‹Implicit’ and ‹Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D., & Lozano, J.M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in Their Own Words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9181-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz Avram, D., & Kühne, S. (2008). Implementing Responsible Business Behavior from a Strategic Management Perspective: Developing a Framework for Austrian SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 463–475. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9897-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (2000). Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 629–653. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., A. Russo and A. Tencati: 2007, ‹CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(3), 285-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. and A. Russo: 2008, ‹Illycaffè: Value Creation through Responsible Supplier Relationships’, Journal of Business Ethics Education 5(Special Issue), 83-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S.2002a, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S. (2002b). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L.E., & Post, J.E. 1975, Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F., Becattini, G., & Sengenberger, W. 1990, Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S., Lawson, R., & Nicholls, J. (2006). Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons from Responsibility Northwest. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 275–286. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9184-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, ‹Formal Vs. Informal CSR Strategies. Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Supplement 2), 339-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J. (1999). “Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics”, Business Ethics. A European Review 8(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., Habisch, A., & Schmidpeter, R. 2004, Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, UK/New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., Jeurissen, R., & Rutherfoord, R. (2000). Small Business and the Environment in the Uk and the Netherlands: Toward Stakeholder Cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 945–965. doi:10.2307/3857841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., & Lozano, J.F. (2000). Communicating About Ethics with Small Firms: Experiences from the U.K. And Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 43–53. doi:10.1023/A:1006417425446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5. doi:10.1023/A:1026205109290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., & Schmidpeter, R. (2003). SMEs, Social Capital and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1-2), 93–108. doi:10.1023/A:1024176613469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the Uk. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17–29. doi:10.1023/A:1026284727037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., A. Russo and V. Quaglia: 2008, ‹Unintended Consequences of CSR: Protectionism and Collateral Damage in Global Supply Chains: The Case of Vietnam’, Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society 8(4), 518-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2000). “Small Firm Environmental Ethics: How Deep Do They Go?”, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 9(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven, B., & Jeurissen, R. (2005). Competing Responsibly. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625–1636. doi:10.1023/A:1022452502299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J.A., & White, J.F. (1981). A Small Business Is Not a Little Big Business. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1980). Social Responsibility of Business: What Are the Small Business Perspectives? Journal of Small Business Management, 18(July), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Parthenope University, Naples, Italy

    Angeloantonio Russo

  2. Bocconi University, Milan, Italy

    Francesco Perrini

Authors
  1. Angeloantonio Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Perrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeloantonio Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, A., Perrini, F. Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs. J Bus Ethics 91, 207–221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation