Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spotlight in the CSR discourse has traditionally been focused on multinational corporations (MNCs). This paper builds on a burgeoning stream of literature that has accorded recent attention to the relevance and importance of integrating small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the CSR debate. The paper begins by an overview of the CSR literature and a synthesis of relevant evidence pertaining to the peculiarities and special relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Noting the thin theoretical grounding in the literature on offer, the paper then presents relevant CSR theoretical perspectives that could be useful in conducting further research on SMEs. In light of this framework, the paper outlines the findings of an empirical study highlighting the peculiar CSR orientations of SMEs in a developing country context in comparison to some of their MNC counterparts. The study is qualitative in nature, capitalizing on a comparative research design to highlight differences in CSR orientations between SMEs and MNCs. The findings are presented and implications are drawn regarding the peculiar relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR generally, and developing countries more specifically, and how this inclination can be further nurtured and leveraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaeshi, K., Adi, B., Ogbechie, C., & Olufemi, O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: Western Mimicry or Indigenous Influences? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A.: 2001, ‹Case Study: Methods and Analysis’, in N. Smelser and P. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Elsevier, The Netherlands), pp. 1513–1519

  • Besser, T., & Miller, N. (2001). Is the Good Corporation Dead? The Community Social Responsibility of Small Business. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(3), 221–230. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00094-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlos, M., Martos, V., & Torraleja, F. (2007). Is Family Business More Socially Responsible: The Case of GRUPO CIM. Business and Society Review, 112(1), 121–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2007.00289.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. doi:10.2307/257850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., Balzarova, M., Bamber, C., & Sharp, J. (2004). How Can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(3), 140-149. doi:10.1002/csr.62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing it. Business & Society, 20(2), 210–219. doi:10.1177/000765030003900205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFillipi, R. J.: 1982, ‹Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Corporate Social Involvement Research’, in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Connecticut)

  • Doh, J., & Guay, T. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy and NGO Activism in Europe and the US: An Institutional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI – Department of Trade and Industry: 2002, Engaging SMEs in Community and Social Issues (DTI, London)

  • Eweje, G. (2006). The Role of MNEs in Community Development Initiatives in Developing Countries. Business & Society, 45(2), 93–129. doi:10.1177/0007650305285394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. and D. Hambrick: 1996, Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West Publishing Co., Minneapolis/St. Paul)

  • Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and Symbolic Capital and Responsible Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Investigation of SME Narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 287–304. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9185-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine publishing: Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., Mazereeuw, C., & Yahia, A. (2006). Islam and Socially Responsible Business Conduct: An Empirical Study of Dutch Entrepreneurs Business Ethics. European Review Chichester England, 15(4), 390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and Instruments for Organizing CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 45–60. doi:10.1023/A:1026240912016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D.: 2006, ‹Inspiring Smaller Firms With the Responsible Business Mindset’, in M. Epstein and K. Hansen (eds.), The Accountable Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility (Praeger, London), pp. 279–298

  • Hannan, M. (1998). Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Formulations. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 126–164. doi:10.1086/210004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., Kaptein, M., & van Oosterhout, J. (2008). Contracts to Communities: A Processual Model of Organizational Virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 100–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41. doi:10.2307/256350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in A Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243–262. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2004). A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H.: 2006, ‹Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 241–256. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, M., Mura, M., & Bonoli, A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs. Corporate Governance, 5(4), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Development Agenda. Inter Economics, 39(3), 157–168. doi:10.1007/BF02933583

    Google Scholar 

  • Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small Business Responsibility in Developing Countries: A Threat or an Opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 38–53. doi:10.1002/bse.427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship Vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non Family Businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. (1983). Case and Situation Analysis. The Sociological Review, 31, 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in Their Own Words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 227–240. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9181-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3 rd edition). Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 305–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9186-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkston, T., & Carroll, A. (1996). A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed? Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 199–206. doi:10.1007/BF00705587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. and A. Hammond: 2002, ‹Serving the World’s Poor Profitably’, Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility (Harvard Business School Press), pp. 1–25

  • Raynard, P. and M. Forstater: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria)

  • Roberts, S., Lawson, R., & Nicholls, J. (2006). Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons from Responsibility Northwest. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 275–286. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9184-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. 1991. ‹Case Studies’, in Handbook for Research Students in the Social Sciences, G. Allan and C. Skinner (Eds.). The Falmer Press: London, New York, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbutts, N. (2003). Can SMEs do CSR? A Practitioner’s View of the Ways Small and Medium Sized Enterprises are Able to Manage Reputation through Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 340–347. doi:10.1108/13632540310807476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, A.: 2006, ‹Case-Based Research’, in Perecman and Curran (eds.), A Handbook for Social Science Field Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California), pp. 21–44

  • Strauss, A. and J. Corbin: 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California)

  • SustainAbility: 2002, Developing Value: The Business Case for Sustainability in Emerging Markets (SustainAbility, London, UK)

  • Visser, W.: 2008, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press), pp. 473–503

  • Vives, A. (2006). Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. (2002). Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, P. 2004. Strategic Entrepreneurship: A Decision-Making Approach To New Venture Creation. FT Prentice Hall, London, pp 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of Environmental Behavior in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-717. doi:10.2307/258977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills, California

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Dima Jamali, Mona Zanhour & Tamar Keshishian

Authors
  1. Dima Jamali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mona Zanhour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamar Keshishian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dima Jamali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamali, D., Zanhour, M. & Keshishian, T. Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR. J Bus Ethics 87, 355–377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9925-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9925-7

Key words

Search

Navigation