Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Applicability of a Contingent Factors Model to Accounting Ethics Research

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the relevancy of a contingent factors model posited by Jones for conducting accounting ethics research. Using a sample of 37 experienced Australian auditing managers and partners of all of the ‘Big Four’ multinational accounting firms, we find that the contextual model developed by Jones can help guide accounting ethics research by isolating the contingent factors that affect ethical decision making. Moreover, we examine how the factors differ across different accounting settings. Implications for accounting ethics research and accounting practice are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance 23(4):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asare S., J. Cohen and G. Trompeter: 2006, ‘The Effect of Non-Audit Services on Client Acceptance and Staffing Decisions’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 489–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett T. (2001). Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31:1038–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beu D., Buckley M.R. (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 34:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko L.B., Hunt S.D. (1985). Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Research 13:339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, G. A., Fetyko D. F., Pearson M. A. (1990). Reactions to Ethical Dilemmas: A Study Pertaining to CPA’s. Journal of Business Ethics 9:699–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R. and L. Holder-Webb: 2006, ‘Rethinking the Influence of Agency Theory in the Accounting Academy’, Issues in Accounting Education, 21(1), 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., Pant L. W., Sharp D. J. (1996). Measuring the Ethical Awareness and Ethical Orientation of Canadian Auditors. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8(Suppl):98–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas P. C., Davidson R. A., Schwartz B. N. (2001). The Effect of Organizational Culture and Ethical Orientation on Accountants Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 34:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky A. J., Loken B. (1989). Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Business Research 19:83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emby C., Gibbins M. (1988). Good Judgment in Public Accounting: Quality and Justification. Contemporary Accounting Research 4(2):287–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. (1994). Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke G. R., Crown D. E., Spake D. F. (1997). Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices. Journal of Applied Psychology 82:920–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B. F. (2000). The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context. Journal of Business Ethics 26:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaa J. C. (1992). Discussion of a Model of Accountants’ Ethical Decision Processes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11(Suppl):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaa J. C. (1995). Moral Judgment and Moral Cognition: A Comment. Research on Accounting Ethics 1:253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks K., Tyson T. (1995). Gender Diversity Driven Changes in the Public Accounting Workplace: A Moral Intensity Analysis. Research on Accounting Ethics 1:267–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson V. E., Kaplan S. E. (1991). Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Accountability on Auditor Judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10(Suppl):96–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones S. K., Ponemon L. A. (1993). A Comment on A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting. The Accounting Review 68(2):411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M., Gautschi F. H. (1988). Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 7:231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J., Massey D. W., Thorne L. (2003). Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insight from Past Research and Implications for the Future. Journal of Accounting Literature 22:45–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim T. M., Grant C. T. (2003). To Tell or Not to Tell: An Auditing Case in Ethical Decision Making and Conflict Resolution. Issues in Accounting Education 18(2):397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley P. C., Elm D. R. (2003). The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones’ Issue Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 48:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchand A. A., Morris R. E., Shafer W. E. (1999). An Analysis of the Role of Moral Intensity in Auditing Judgments. Research on Accounting Ethics 5:249–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kida T. (1980). An Investigation into Auditors’ Continuity and Related Qualification Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 18(2):506–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. Goslin, and R. McNally (eds,), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Chicago, pp. 347–480

  • Kohlberg L. (1976). Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach. In: Likona T. (eds). Moral Development and Behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe J. C., Finn D. W. (1992). A Model of Auditors’ Ethical Decision Processes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11(Suppl):33–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund D. B. (2000). An Empirical Examination of Marketing Professions’ Ethical Behavior in Differing Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 24:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mautz R. K., Sharaf H. A. (1961) The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association, Sarasota, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K. (1997). Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multi-Campus Investigation. Research in Higher Education 38:379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messier W. F. Jr., Quilliam W. C. (1992). The Effect of Accountability of Judgments: Development of Hypotheses for Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11(Suppl):123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno K., Bhattacharjee S. (2003). The Impact from Potential Client Business Opportunities on the Judgements of Auditors Across Professional Ranks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22(1):14–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A. (1990). Ethical Judgment in Accounting: A Cognitive – Developmental Perspective. Critical Perspectives in Accounting 1:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A. (1992). Ethical Reasoning and Selection – Socialization in Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3/4):239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A., Gabhart D. R. L. (1993). Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing, Research Monograph 21. CGA – Canada Research Foundation, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, S.: 2001: ‘Insights for Accounting Research from Retrospectives on Business Ethics Research’, The ABO Reporter, Accounting, Behavior and Organizations Section, Winter

  • Rest J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. (1994). Background Theory and Research. In: Rest J., Navarez D. (eds). Moral Development in the Professions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger D., King E.W. (1992). A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11,179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107–204 (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.)

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1405 (SEC, Washington, D.C.)

  • Shafer W. E., Morris R. E., Ketchand A. A. (1999). The Effects of Formal Sanctions on Auditor Independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (Suppl):85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer W. E., Morris R. E., Ketchand A. A. (2001). Effects of Personal Values on Auditors’ Ethical Decisions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(3):254–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M., Finn D. W., Munter D. W. (1993). The Effects of Auditors’ Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting 5:145–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M. (1994). An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Cognitive Moral Development of Accountants and Auditing Students. Journal of Accounting Education 12:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S. (1996). The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. Journal of Business Ethics 15:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S., Singer A. E. (1997). Observer Judgments about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 16:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M., Mitchell S., Turner J. (1998). Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgments: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-for-Cognition. Journal of Business Ethics 17:527–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.: 1996, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Science, 3rd edn (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwab, NJ)

  • Sweeney J. T. (1995). The Moral Expertise of Auditors: An Exploratory Analysis. Research on Accounting Ethics 1:213–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne L. (1998). The Role of Virtue on Accountants’ Ethics Decision Making. Research on Accounting Ethics 4:291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne L. (2000). The Development of Context-Specific Measures of Accountants’ Ethical Reasoning. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 12:139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L.K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person–Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. and G. Weaver: 2003, Managing Ethics in Business Organizations. Social Scientific Perspectives (Stanford Business Books, Stanford)

  • Watley L. D., May D. R. (2004). Enhancing Moral Intensity: The Roles of Personal and Consequential Information in Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 50:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Wallace E. Carroll School, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02167-3808, United States

    Jeffrey R. Cohen

  2. Sydney university, Sydney, Australia

    Nonna Martinov Bennie

Authors
  1. Jeffrey R. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nonna Martinov Bennie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Cohen.

Additional information

Jeffrey R. Cohen, PhD is an Associate Professor at the Carroll School of management at Boston College. His research focuses primarily on behavioral ethics issues as well as investigating governance from a behavioral perspective.

Nonna Martinov Bennie is a Senior Lecturer at Sydney University. Her research focuses on ethical issues in auditing as well as issues surrounding materiality judgments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, J., Bennie, N. The Applicability of a Contingent Factors Model to Accounting Ethics Research. J Bus Ethics 68, 1–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9036-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9036-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation