Abstract
As society increasingly values sustainability and social responsibility, companies are embracing social innovation activities to tackle pressing societal challenges. Understanding the factors that shape consumer participation in Corporate Social Innovation (CSI) activities is vital for their success. Drawing on the legitimacy theory, this study investigates the mediating role of legitimacy and the moderating effect of psychological distance in the relationship between information quality and consumers’ participation intention. To gather insights, a questionnaire survey was conducted, and statistical analysis was performed using data collected from 565 consumers. The results demonstrate that the information content, source, and expression quality of CSI activities significantly and positively influence consumer participation. In addition, the study identifies moral and pragmatic legitimacy as mediators, elucidating the mechanisms through which information quality influences consumers’ participation intention. Moreover, psychological distance is found to negatively moderate the relationship between moral legitimacy and consumers’ participation intention. These findings enrich our understanding of social innovation activities and provide valuable insights for companies aiming to enhance consumer participation in these activities. The research contributes to the existing body of knowledge on social innovation activities by enriching the understanding of the role of information quality in shaping consumer behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1777
Alhouti, S., Johnson, C. M., & Holloway, B. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.007
Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032005
Ben Slimane, K., Chaney, D., Humphreys, A., & Leca, B. (2019). Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 105, 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.042
Chakraborty, U. (2019). The impact of source credible online reviews on purchase intention: The mediating roles of brand equity dimensions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(2), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2018-0080
Charnock, D., Shepperd, S., Needham, G., & Gann, R. (1999). DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
Chen, S., Zhang, J. A., Gao, H., Yang, Z., & Mather, D. (2022). Trust erosion during industry-wide crises: The central role of consumer legitimacy judgement. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04588-0
Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., & Wright, R. T. (2012). Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 1003. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703491
Chou, C.-H., Wang, Y.-S., & Tang, T.-I. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: A social influence perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.001
Clauzel, A., Delacour, H., & Liarte, S. (2019). When cuisine becomes less haute: The impact of expert ratings on consumers’ legitimacy judgments. Journal of Business Research, 105, 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.038
Demirel, B., & Payne, A. K. H. (2018). Social innovation adoption behavior: The case of Zumbara. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 15(02), 1850016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877018500165
Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2019). Factors affecting individual decisions based on business legitimacy. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2018.1443308
Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Finch, D., Deephouse, D., & Varella, P. (2015). Examining an individual’s legitimacy judgment using the value-attitude system: The role of environmental and economic values and source credibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2031-5
Flanagin, A. J., Winter, S., & Metzger, M. J. (2020). Making sense of credibility in complex information environments: The role of message sidedness, information source, and thinking styles in credibility evaluation online. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1547411
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gómez-Carrasco, P., Guillamón-Saorín, E., & García Osma, B. (2021). Stakeholders versus firm communication in social media: The case of twitter and corporate social responsibility information. European Accounting Review, 30(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1708428
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I– method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Invernizzi, A. C., Bellucci, M., Acuti, D., & Manetti, G. (2022). Form and substance: Visual content in CSR reports and investors’ perceptions. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21635
Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019
Ivanova Ruffo, O., Mnisri, K., Morin-Esteves, C., & Gendron, C. (2020). Judgements of SMEs’ legitimacy and its sources. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4063-3
Jiang, Y. N., & Park, H. (2021). The effects of CSR appeals and message sources on consumer responses to branded content on Instagram. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.1973930
Lee, Y.-J., Yoon, H. J., & O’Donnell, N. H. (2018). The effects of information cues on perceived legitimacy of companies that promote corporate social responsibility initiatives on social networking sites. Journal of Business Research, 83, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.039
Li, J., He, H., Liu, H., & Su, C. (2017). Consumer responses to corporate environmental actions in China: An environmental legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2807-x
Li, M., Li, Y., Peng, Q., & Wang, J. (2021). A hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with TODIM to evaluate the information quality of community question answering in a two-dimensional linguistic environment. Expert Systems, 38(2), e12619. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12619
Maltz, E., & Pierson, K. (2022). Maximizing corporate social innovation to enhance social and shareholder value: A systems thinking model of industry transformation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.071
Mirvis, P., Herrera, M. E. B., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5014–5021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.073
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. In Psychometric Theory (3rd ed., pp. 248-292). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Randrianasolo, A. A., & Arnold, M. J. (2020). Consumer legitimacy: Conceptualization and measurement scales. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2019-3124
Raza, A., Farrukh, M., Iqbal, M. K., Farhan, M., & Wu, Y. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior: The role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(3), 1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2109
Saxton, G. D., Gomez, L., Ngoh, Z., Lin, Y.-P., & Dietrich, S. (2019). Do CSR messages resonate? Examining public reactions to firms’ CSR efforts on social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3464-z
Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/253769.253804
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Lazzini, A. (2020). Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders’ perceptions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2373
Tost, L. P. (2011). An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0227
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Tsai, J.-M., Hung, S.-W., & Yang, T.-T. (2020). In pursuit of goodwill? The cross-level effects of social enterprise consumer behaviours. Journal of Business Research, 109, 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.051
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
Wang, T., Gao, J., Jia, Y., & Wang, C. L. (2022). The double-edged sword effect of adaptation strategy on performance: The mediation of legitimacy and synergy. Journal of Business Research, 139, 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.004
Wu, X., Xiong, J., Yan, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Perceived quality of traceability information and its effect on purchase intention towards organic food. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(13–14), 1267–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1910328
Xiao, X., & Shailer, G. (2022). Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. The British Accounting Review, 54(1), 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101002
Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Grønhaug, K. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences. Journal of Business Research, 95, 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.043
Xiong, L., & Zhao, J. (2015). The influence of brand experience on brand trust studies the mediating effect of psychological distance. Journal of Commercial Economics, 679(24), 71–73.
Yang, K., Kim, J., Min, J., & Hernandez-Calderon, A. (2021). Effects of retailers’ service quality and legitimacy on behavioral intention: The role of emotions during COVID-19. The Service Industries Journal, 41(1–2), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1863373
Zeng, Y., & Xu, D. (2020). Liability of foreignness and the constitutive legitimation of foreign firms in a host country. Journal of World Business, 55(5), 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101111
Zhang J. (2021). The practice of CSR development and its performing mechanism——Case study of P&G. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology, 3(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2021.030213
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Zha, X., Yang, H., Yan, Y., Liu, K., & Huang, C. (2018). Exploring the effect of social media information quality, source credibility and reputation on informational fit-to-task: Moderating role of focused immersion. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.038
Funding
National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 20AGL019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhejiang Gongshang University. Informed consent was obtained from all survey subjects participating in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Plots of moderating effects
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, J., He, J. & Zhang, Y. Driving consumer participation in corporate social innovation: the role of information quality, legitimacy, and psychological distance. Curr Psychol 43, 25847–25861 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06202-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06202-2