@osiewicz Are you sure this is set up as intended? You're using the SPDX identifier for the GPLv3, which is different from the AGPL - the AGPL has additional requirements for network distribution.

Usually it's a good idea to drop a LICENSE file that explains which parts of the repo are available under which license alongside verbatim copies of the license.

Hey, I think in this case the title of PR is a bit misleading; we've applied the or-later suffix to both GPL and AGPL crates. Vast majority of our crates are licensed with GPL3, but e.g. collab is AGPL and it had it's license field changed in this PR as well. That's also reflected in a way this PR was structured - changes to GPL crates are in a separate commit from changes to AGPL crates.
Also, we already have LICENSE files at the root of the repo. Each crate also symlinks to the LICENSE file that applies to it.