Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added GetRemoteBlob interface to support user-specified buffer for data storage. #1956

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

vegetableysm
Copy link
Collaborator

What do these changes do?

As tittled

Related issue number

Fixes #1955

@vegetableysm vegetableysm changed the title Added GetRemoteBlob interface to support user-specified buffer for data storage. [WIP]Added GetRemoteBlob interface to support user-specified buffer for data storage. Jul 23, 2024
…ta storage.

Signed-off-by: vegetableysm <yuanshumin.ysm@alibaba-inc.com>
@vegetableysm vegetableysm force-pushed the add-new-get-remote-api branch from 36ae789 to 6d6f0c8 Compare July 23, 2024 10:48
@vegetableysm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Maybe I can extract a lot of common code from RPCClient.cc

@vegetableysm vegetableysm self-assigned this Jul 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: vegetableysm <yuanshumin.ysm@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: vegetableysm <yuanshumin.ysm@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: vegetableysm <yuanshumin.ysm@alibaba-inc.com>
@vegetableysm vegetableysm changed the title [WIP]Added GetRemoteBlob interface to support user-specified buffer for data storage. Added GetRemoteBlob interface to support user-specified buffer for data storage. Jul 24, 2024
@sighingnow sighingnow merged commit e88263c into v6d-io:main Jul 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@sighingnow sighingnow deleted the add-new-get-remote-api branch July 24, 2024 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add new GetRemoteObject api to support use buffer provided by user.
2 participants