Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI-improvements #962

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2022
Merged

CI-improvements #962

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2022

Conversation

NickCrews
Copy link
Contributor

Makes things a little easier for me, who was drive by editing on github.dev, therefore I didn;t have the local linting tools so I was relying on the CI linters more.

So that you can actually see what you need to change, not
just the fact that there's a problem
Before, if one failed, then it stopped early. It's nice to see all
problems early though so you can fix everything at the same time.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 96.68% // Head: 96.68% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (3bda1c7) compared to base (5fd3e55).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #962   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.68%   96.68%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        4197     4197           
=======================================
  Hits         4058     4058           
  Misses        139      139           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@@ -62,12 +62,15 @@ jobs:
run: pre-commit run isort --all-files

- name: Black
if: always()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this command is new to me, looks helpful!

wondering tho, shouldn't this be ${{ always() }} ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It magically works without the brackets :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cosmicBboy cosmicBboy merged commit 9ac9ed4 into unionai-oss:master Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants