Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "print default value in jsonformat" #3943

Merged

Conversation

waynercheung
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #3914

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3943 (ca1cd0e) into release_v4.3.0 (6818029) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##             release_v4.3.0    #3943      +/-   ##
====================================================
- Coverage             52.66%   52.63%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity             7166     7160       -6     
====================================================
  Files                   768      768              
  Lines                 43679    43681       +2     
  Branches               4727     4728       +1     
====================================================
- Hits                  23003    22991      -12     
- Misses                18875    18888      +13     
- Partials               1801     1802       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...n/java/org/tron/core/services/http/JsonFormat.java 10.09% <0.00%> (-1.83%) ⬇️
...mework/src/main/java/org/tron/core/db/Manager.java 56.49% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
.../java/org/tron/common/overlay/server/SyncPool.java 41.12% <0.00%> (-0.94%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ef151b4...ca1cd0e. Read the comment docs.

@waynercheung waynercheung merged commit 624730f into release_v4.3.0 Jul 27, 2021
@ethan1844 ethan1844 deleted the revert-3914-feature/print_default_value_in_http branch March 30, 2022 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants