Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Support for Google Cloud Storage #49

Closed
tmspzz opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

Add Support for Google Cloud Storage #49

tmspzz opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 13 comments

Comments

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner

tmspzz commented Mar 22, 2017

Enhancement Suggestion

Add support for Google Cloud Storage

Current and suggested behavior

Currently only Amazon's S3 is supported as remote storage. Supporting Google Cloud Storage would allow users on the Google Cloud to use Rome too

Why would the enhancement be useful to most users

Supporting Google Cloud Storage would allow users on the Google Cloud to use rome too.

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented May 12, 2017

Use this library: https://github.com/brendanhay/gogol

@RafaelPlantard
Copy link

Are you developing it or can I start to do it?

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented Dec 4, 2018

I think this issue is superseded by #146

I don't have an estimate for completing #146

@RafaelPlantard
Copy link

RafaelPlantard commented Dec 5, 2018

I can start it!
So will we follow the approach discussed at #146?

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented Dec 5, 2018

@RafaelPlantard I have done some work here #148.

I think the direction I was going with was to call the engine scripts with the path to the binary to upload and where to upload it, hiding all the rest of the logic for now. In the end the script does not need to know WHY it's uploading/downloading/listing something, it should just do it no questions asked.

I updated the branch with the latest changes from master so at least it's compiling.

@RafaelPlantard
Copy link

I will take a look...

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented Dec 6, 2018

@RafaelPlantard if you are having trouble building, see #158 (comment)

@RafaelPlantard
Copy link

Are you reading my mind? I'm facing some troubles with install Brittany, too

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented Dec 6, 2018

You don’t need Brittany. I can run it after.

@RafaelPlantard
Copy link

I'm super beginner in Haskell, is there a good material to beginners?

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented Dec 6, 2018

http://haskellbook.com or http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~pszgmh/pih.html

However implementing #146 might be not the best beginner task.

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented May 18, 2019

@RafaelPlantard Thanks to @BalestraPatrick you can now use whatever backend you want

@tmspzz tmspzz closed this as completed May 18, 2019
@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner Author

tmspzz commented May 18, 2019

You can try the pre-release at: https://github.com/blender/Rome/releases/tag/v0.22.0.59

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants