Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract implications: unknowns subcommands --duality flag #399

Merged

Conversation

amirlb
Copy link
Contributor

@amirlb amirlb commented Oct 7, 2024

Also add the current results, and correct the data of yesterday's files

Closes #397

@pitmonticone
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot!

Is this PR ready to be merged or are you still working on it?

If it's ready to be merged, please write awaiting-review.

@amirlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

amirlb commented Oct 7, 2024

awaiting-review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting-review the PR passes CI and is ready for review label Oct 7, 2024
@amirlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

amirlb commented Oct 7, 2024

Thanks, I totally forgot about this step

@pitmonticone
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you @amirlb.

I merged main. I will for the CI and then I'll merge.

@pitmonticone pitmonticone merged commit b14d9b3 into teorth:main Oct 7, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-review the PR passes CI and is ready for review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FRONTEND: Add a script that filters unknown implications up to duality
2 participants