-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support stepTemplate alongside script mode #1653
Conversation
MergeStepsWithStepTemplate now takes into account a step Script, instead of zeroing it out. There's still room for improvement here; Merge can happen after script conversion, if script mode is able to accept template-provided args.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot!
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🙏
@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ func MergeStepsWithStepTemplate(template *v1.Container, steps []Step) ([]Step, e | |||
merged.Args = []string{} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
steps[i] = Step{Container: *merged} | |||
// Pass through original step Script, for later conversion. | |||
steps[i] = Step{Container: *merged, Script: s.Script} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
coming in late to the party, but it looks like we have merge_test.go
, probs makes sense to add a test case for this?
steps[i].Command = []string{tmpFile} | ||
steps[i].Args = nil // TODO(#1652): Don't overwrite this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
similarly for this, can has unit test in script_test.go
?
Adds tests for script preservation and args alongside scripts
Adds tests for script preservation and args alongside scripts
MergeStepsWithStepTemplate
now takes into account a step Script, insteadof zeroing it out.
There's still room for improvement here; Merge can happen after script
conversion, if script mode is able to accept template-provided args (#1652)
Fixes #1647
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
See the contribution guide for more details.