Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a PackageMaker project file for building OS X pkg installers #748

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

mattrajca
Copy link
Contributor

The "New Releases" wiki page has already been updated with instructions (https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/New-Release). Tested with OS X Lion and OS X Snow Leopard Server running in a VM.

@vperic
Copy link
Contributor

vperic commented Nov 23, 2011

Please don't create directories with spaces in the filename (it's really annoying on Linux). :) OSXPackage is a good enough name, though.

Also, git is complaining about the lack of an ending newline in the .xml files, unless it's a problem to have them there (I don't know the format you're going for), then just put them so shut git up. :) (if they were autogenerated or something, leave them be I guess).

Can't really comment on the content, though, I don't use Mac. Lets wait for @asmeurer to ok it (he's the only one on Mac as far as I know).

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sY-pcFDA

Note A custom interpreter was used: python2.5

Summary: All tests have passed.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sYkJAFDA

Note A custom interpreter was used: python3

Summary: There were test failures.

@mattrajca: Please fix the test failures.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.

@vperic
Copy link
Contributor

vperic commented Nov 24, 2011

Don't worry about the Python 3 errors, they are unrelated (obviously).

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Aaron Meurer
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sYkJAFDA

Note A custom interpreter was used: python3

Summary: There were test failures.

@mattrajca: Please fix the test failures.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#748 (comment)

Vladimir Perić

@mattrajca
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated the directory name. And those XML files were auto generated... Do you need me to do anything else?

@vperic
Copy link
Contributor

vperic commented Nov 25, 2011

If Aaron can test this, it can go in. I really can't as I've no Mac available.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

And those XML files were auto generated...

Auto generated from what? We should put in something that will generate the XML files, not the generated files.

The problem is that, as you can see, the files reference the files on your specific system.

Anyway, this doesn't sem to work. I can create the installer, but the installation itself doesn't seem to work (if it does, I can't really tell where it's installing to).

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

For the last 3 days there was no activity on this, should we close it and reopen the task?
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2011/7131305

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Actually it's 4 days already. The student has not responded here or on melange. The deadline has passed but because it was marked as 'ready for review' the task was not automatically reopened. I'm reopening the task. If the student wishes he can of course reapply and he will be accepted. He could even reopen this pull request.

@Krastanov Krastanov closed this Nov 28, 2011
@asmeurer asmeurer reopened this Nov 28, 2011
@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

No need to close the pull request, though. We generally only do that if there hasn't been any work for a really long time (and even then, always make sure it is referenced in some issue somewhere, so that we can find it again).

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Ok, thanks for the remark.

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sY78MGDA

Interpreter: /usr/bin/python (2.7.1-final-0)
Architecture: Linux (64-bit)
Cache: yes
Test command: setup.py test
master hash: 928c02d
branch hash: 029a046
XPassed tests: 2

Summary: All tests have passed.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sYnLQGDA

Interpreter: /usr/bin/python (3.2.0-final-0)
Architecture: Linux (64-bit)
Cache: yes
Test command: setup.py test
master hash: 928c02d
branch hash: 029a046
XPassed tests: 2

Summary: All tests have passed.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Test results html report: http://reviews.sympy.org/report/agZzeW1weTNyDAsSBFRhc2sY45kHDA

Interpreter: /usr/bin/python (2.5.6-final-0)
Architecture: Linux (64-bit)
Cache: yes
Test command: setup.py test
master hash: 928c02d
branch hash: 029a046
XPassed tests: 2

Summary: All tests have passed.

Automatic review by sympy-bot.

@smichr smichr closed this Dec 5, 2011
@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

Should this actually be merged. It seems there were some problems (see the comments).

@vperic
Copy link
Contributor

vperic commented Dec 7, 2011

I don't think this should be merged, it doesn't even work for Aaron.

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

That's why I'm asking. If you were answering by mail and couldn't check, it actually got merged 2 days ago.

@vperic
Copy link
Contributor

vperic commented Dec 7, 2011

Actually, I am looking at it, I think @smichr just closed the pull request, without merging it in. I also can't seem to find it in my history, so I guess it wasn't merged.

@smichr
Copy link
Member

smichr commented Dec 8, 2011

I closed it about two days ago; I left and issue so it wouldn't be
lost. I didn't merge it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants