syntax highlight and allow running code from schelp files #1052
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danstowell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2014
syntax highlight and allow running code while editing schelp files in a document window
|
yeah why not. note that your commit-comment "from schelp files" isn't completely obvious - you're referring to editing schelp files, not viewing them. |
|
please note that this violates the design principle behind the IDE: if something is done, it should be done right. if something can only be done incompletely or the only partially correct, it should not be done. but i only wrote the code, i don't have any veto. |
|
I guess you have a point there. I wouldn't mind reverting the commit. |
|
I'm proposing reverting this pull request with another pull request: #1293 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's not pretty but it's better then a completely black text... addresses issue #330