We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This will avoid API signature permutation explosion as we extend the API in the future, thus avoiding a maintenance headache.
We will offer a hybrid API that consists of the following:
Keep the following existing non-fluent API for simple use cases:
send(message) send(topic, message) sendAsync(message) sendAsnyc(topic, message)
Replace all other variants w/ a fluent based DSL as such:
template.prepare() .message("5150") .toTopic("topic-one") //.toDefaultTopic() .withRouter(customRouter) .withInterceptor(customInterceptor) .withCustomizer(messageKeyCustomizer) .send(); // .sendAsync()
PulsarOperations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add fluent API to PulsarTemplate
64247c4
See spring-projects#68
Add docs for fluent API
e8fbc54
Fix formatting for "Add fluent API"
1e1d6de
cca3115
Fixes spring-projects#68
c1d155e
onobc
No branches or pull requests
This will avoid API signature permutation explosion as we extend the API in the future, thus avoiding a maintenance headache.
We will offer a hybrid API that consists of the following:
Keep the following existing non-fluent API for simple use cases:
Replace all other variants w/ a fluent based DSL as such:
Points to consider
PulsarOperations
? Should we keep it?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: