Looks like the name and version keyword arguments are not being passed
correctly for the built in models.
On Mar 31, 2015 11:09 AM, "rbiswas4" notifications@github.com wrote:

print model is supposed to return a summary of the SN model at any point.
At present, if a Model is instantiated by

model = sncosmo.Model(source='salt2')
p = {'z':0.5, 'c': 0.1, 'x0': 4.6e-7., 'x1': 1.2}
model.set(**p)
print model

rint model
<Model at 0x103888750>
source:
class : SALT2Source
name : None
version : None
phases : [-20, .., 50] days
wavelengths: [2000, .., 9200] Angstroms
parameters:
z = 0.5
t0 = 0.0
x0 = 4.5999999999999999e-07
x1 = 1.2
c = 0.10000000000000001```

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#82.

Yes, I think there was an intent at some point that users should be able to assign a name of their choice to a source when creating a SALT2Source. But when using a built-in, this should not be None.

It used to be 'salt2' but looks like something changed in the process of
refactoring the built in data.
On Mar 31, 2015 11:33 AM, "rbiswas4" notifications@github.com wrote:

Yes, I think there was an intent at some point that users should be able
to assign a name of their choice to a source when creating a SALT2Source.
But when using a built-in, this should not be None.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#82 (comment).