-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add STEAM #2453
Add STEAM #2453
Conversation
Thanks for making an Awesome list! 🙌 It looks like you didn't read the guidelines closely enough. I noticed multiple things that are not followed. Try going through the list point for point to ensure you follow it. I spent a lot of time creating the guidelines so I wouldn't have to comment on common mistakes, and rather spend my time improving Awesome. |
@sindresorhus Fixed the link so the check runs correctly. The linting fails, but because of one error regarding the table of contents. In my case, making each section have a list on the same page would make the list unnecessarily messy and difficult to navigate through. To fix the linting issue, I can make it so that each point in the toc like science, tech, etc. links to a section on the main readme and then in each section is one link to the separate GitHub list, however that is adding unnecessary details. I understand that this is not like the usual way the lists are created, however in this case I propose allowing the current structure. I don't see any guideline that explicitly states that the full list must reside on the main readme (correct me if I'm wrong). Other than that issue, everything else completely matches the list guidelines. If you have any other suggestions on how I can structure it, please let me know! |
@RahulBirCodes I think you can:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add your entry to the bottom of the list as per guidelines and shorten description to be concise, objective and non-marketing as well.
Hello Unicorn, [Awesome Certificates](https://github.com/PanxProject/awesome-certificates#readme) [Free computer science certifications & digital badges to earn.] Also reviewed and commented on these PRs: [sindresorhus#2453](sindresorhus#2453 (comment)), [sindresorhus#2418](sindresorhus#2418 (review)) and [sindresorhus#2394](sindresorhus#2394 (review)). Looking forward to be awesome, Thanks!
Hello Unicorn, I've created [Awesome Certificates](https://github.com/PanxProject/awesome-certificates#readme)! **The project's aim is to provide free computer science certifications & digital badges to earn.** I have reviewed and commented on these PRs: [sindresorhus#2453](sindresorhus#2453 (comment)), [sindresorhus#2418](sindresorhus#2418 (review)) and [sindresorhus#2394](sindresorhus#2394 (review)). I've also followed the guidelines and checked project with `awesome-lint` with no issues detected. Looking forward to be awesome, Thanks!
This list is missing quite a few sub categories like Physical Geography. There are a few meta subject lists on Wikipedia. I feel like maybe there should be a page with these items as requested/needed as it is a large task for one person. Otherwise, exited to watch this one grow. Hoping to contribute soon. :) |
@stark1tty I agree, there are a lot of subcategories! That's why I've been mostly trying to focus on specific school courses right now, but would be awesome to add more categories! Excited as well to see more contributions and where this can go! |
Additionally, maybe there should be room (a sub header) on these subcategories for relevant awesome lists? :) I could definitely put a few relevant ones up right now for certain subjects. |
@stark1tty Ya totally, except instead of creating a specific section just for awesome list you can just list the awesome list under the section like calculus. bio, etc. Would be awesome if you could put up a few! I don't want to make a specific section for relevant awesome lists because this content is also published on a website I created awesomeSTEAM.org which the majority of students and teachers who view the list use. In the context of the website, having a section for related awesome lists doesn't make too much sense because most teachers/students using aren't on Github. |
@stark1tty Would be awesome though if you could add some more resources whenever you get a chance :) Would love to see more contributors! |
There are several unhandled pull requests: https://github.com/RahulBirCodes/awesome-steam/pulls |
@sindresorhus I was requesting changes in those pull requests due to typos and the breadth of the of content being added. However, I have closed most that no longer fit with the updated content of the awesome list, and there are only two pull requests left requesting changes. However, since those are outdated and it has been a while without a response, I could close those as well. |
awesome-steam
A curated list of science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) resources to help aid students in specific classes across all grade levels or to provide curious minds with a starting point into numerous topics.
By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖
Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.
Requirements for your pull request
Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions.
Pull Request #2449
Pull Request #2448
You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
This pull request has a title in the format
Add Name of List
.Add Swift
Add Software Architecture
Update readme.md
Add Awesome Swift
Add swift
add Swift
Adding Swift
Added Swift
Your entry here should include a short description about the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb.
- [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
- [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
- [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
- [Framer](…)
- [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
Your entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in
#readme
.- [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.
Requirements for your Awesome list
That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
awesome-lint
on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.main
, notmaster
.Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
Prototyping interactive UI designs.
Resources and tools for iOS development.
Awesome Framer packages and tools.
If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
awesome-name-of-list
.awesome-swift
awesome-web-typography
awesome-Swift
AwesomeWebTypography
# Awesome Name of List
.# Awesome Swift
# Awesome Web Typography
# awesome-swift
# AwesomeSwift
awesome-list
&awesome
as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.Contents
, notTable of Contents
.Contributing
orFootnotes
sections.https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0
(replace<user>
and<repo>
accordingly).license
orLICENSE
in the repo root with the license text.Licence
section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.unicorn
.contributing.md
. Casing is up to you.Contributing
, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.Footnotes
section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.Example:
- [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
Node.js
, notNodeJS
ornode.js
.You can still use Travis for list linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
Inspired by awesome-foo
orInspired by the Awesome project
kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.Go to the top and read it again.