Masterdetail different idfield #3272
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think that's a dangerous way to use master-detail relation, e.g. using a field that might change, and smells like a bad design. Anyway, please change AltIdField to MasterKeyField and idField to masterKeyField and will merge this one. |
|
Build broken, you should change in other places as well |
|
Hmm compiles fine on my machine?!? |
|
Thanks for the merge. I really like to participate in this great project... |
|
@hannesb is this supposed to work with MasterFields, that are empty? (ie no details) |
This was referenced Oct 15, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes, it makes sense not to use the primary key field of the master table for a master detail relationship. For example if you have a field with a unique constraint on the master table (like a alphanumeric order number in the northwind orders table) and want the master detail relationship to use that field.
This extension of the MasterDetailRelationBehaviour adds this feature.