-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor Dockerfile #245
Merged
Merged
refactor Dockerfile #245
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
It is already set in the golang:1.10.3-alpine3.8 image. Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
The correct value is embedded in the go tool. Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
The latest golang version thus far. Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
First stage does the build in a pristine alpine environment. Second stage is a minimal image with just the necessary stuff to run the compiled binary. Also added packages for gcc and musl-dev so cgo can do its thang. Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
ccojocar
requested changes
Sep 25, 2018
README.md
Outdated
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ You can run the `gosec` tool in a container against your local Go project. You j | |||
`GOPATH` of the container: | |||
|
|||
``` | |||
docker run -it -v $GOPATH/src/<YOUR PROJECT PATH>:/go/src/<YOUR PROJECT PATH> securego/gosec /go/src/<YOUR PROJECT PATH> | |||
docker run -it -v $GOPATH/src/<YOUR PROJECT PATH>:/go/src/<YOUR PROJECT PATH> ./... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You missed the image from the command. I think it this remain the same securego/gosec
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
ccojocar
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refactor the
Dockerfile
:gcc
andmusl-dev
socgo
can operatedocker-entrypoint.sh
(doesn't seem to be needed) withgosec
binaryFinal docker image built should be the same interface.