Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC Ensures that linkage_tree passes numpydoc validation #21424

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2021

Conversation

chritter
Copy link
Contributor

Reference Issues/PRs

Addresses #21350

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Fixed docstring to allow linkage_tree docstring to pass numpydoc validation.

Any other comments?

Work done with @fortune-uwha.

#DataUmbrella Sprint
@reshamas

@chritter chritter changed the title [WIP] DOC Ensures that linkage_tree passes numpydoc validation DOC Ensures that linkage_tree passes numpydoc validation Oct 23, 2021
@adrinjalali adrinjalali merged commit e4a0bfc into scikit-learn:main Oct 23, 2021
ogrisel pushed a commit to ogrisel/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2021
…n#21424)

* DOC numpydoc removed linkage_tree from FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST

* DOC numpydoc fixed linkage_tree func docstring
samronsin pushed a commit to samronsin/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2021
…n#21424)

* DOC numpydoc removed linkage_tree from FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST

* DOC numpydoc fixed linkage_tree func docstring
glemaitre pushed a commit to glemaitre/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2021
…n#21424)

* DOC numpydoc removed linkage_tree from FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST

* DOC numpydoc fixed linkage_tree func docstring
glemaitre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2021
* DOC numpydoc removed linkage_tree from FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST

* DOC numpydoc fixed linkage_tree func docstring
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants