Multi Line #6
Labels
Comments
|
Sorry no it does not and I don't plan to because it's very hard to do it in
an OS agnostic way
…On Nov 7, 2017 1:44 PM, "Brian Voelker" ***@***.***> wrote:
Will this do multi line outputs?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGPyE9-_w4R3P3L-vgFjpK8Z9mc7zZrnks5s0ME2gaJpZM4QVaz3>
.
|
|
If this is mentioned in the readme, it will be greatly helpful |
3 tasks
aviator-app bot
pushed a commit
to alcionai/corso
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2022
## Description Adds a new package- Observe- for owning user- oriented displays like progress bars. This PR adds an initial progress bar to onedrive backups as a proof-of-concept. The API is more important than the specific progress bar package at this time. Future changes may opt for a different pkg. Display format currently looks like: ``` 59% [=============> ] (6.9/12 kB, 14 MB/s) | Item_Name.txt ``` Known Issues: * the `progressbar` package does not support multiline output, and [the author is not planning to add support](schollz/progressbar#6). This causes concurrent items to overwrite each other. We will either need to fork the library, or change to a different one. ## Type of change - [x] 🌻 Feature ## Issue(s) * #1112 ## Test Plan - [x] 💪 Manual - [x] ⚡ Unit test
ryanfkeepers
added a commit
to alcionai/corso
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
## Description Adds a new package- Observe- for owning user- oriented displays like progress bars. This PR adds an initial progress bar to onedrive backups as a proof-of-concept. The API is more important than the specific progress bar package at this time. Future changes may opt for a different pkg. Display format currently looks like: ``` 59% [=============> ] (6.9/12 kB, 14 MB/s) | Item_Name.txt ``` Known Issues: * the `progressbar` package does not support multiline output, and [the author is not planning to add support](schollz/progressbar#6). This causes concurrent items to overwrite each other. We will either need to fork the library, or change to a different one. ## Type of change - [x] 🌻 Feature ## Issue(s) * #1112 ## Test Plan - [x] 💪 Manual - [x] ⚡ Unit test
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Will this do multi line outputs?
If so you may want to add that to the docs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: