We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I tried using the FindMarkers() or FindAllMarkers() fc.name parameter in Seurat 4.0.1, but it does not seem to have any effect:
FindMarkers()
FindAllMarkers()
fc.name
> library(Seurat) Attaching SeuratObject > data("pbmc_small") > markers <- FindMarkers(object = pbmc_small, ident.1 = 2, fc.name = "xxx") |++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++| 100% elapsed=00s > head(markers) p_val avg_log2FC pct.1 pct.2 p_val_adj HLA-DPB1 2.667056e-08 2.523409 0.947 0.410 6.134228e-06 MS4A1 7.532290e-08 6.540876 0.526 0.033 1.732427e-05 HLA-DQB1 2.436852e-07 2.956945 0.789 0.246 5.604759e-05 HLA-DRB1 1.341885e-06 2.393562 0.842 0.410 3.086335e-04 HLA-DRA 4.618445e-06 2.614768 0.895 0.623 1.062242e-03 TCL1A 6.943137e-06 5.886009 0.368 0.016 1.596922e-03
The fold change column in still avg_log2FC. Is this expected behavior?
avg_log2FC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pass fc.name parameter; #4474
7cd62d6
This should now be fixed on the develop branch
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I tried using the
FindMarkers()
orFindAllMarkers()
fc.name
parameter in Seurat 4.0.1, but it does not seem to have any effect:The fold change column in still
avg_log2FC
. Is this expected behavior?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: