-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros #134865
Conversation
r? @onur-ozkan rustbot has assigned @onur-ozkan. Use |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
8ce1957
to
af9a93b
Compare
af9a93b
to
f3b555e
Compare
f3b555e
to
fc73cfe
Compare
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@bors r+ |
…zkan bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros Fixes rust-lang#134863 1. Checks if a crate name is in a static list before applying the flag 2. Adds a tidy check that gathers transitive deps of proc macros and ensures the list is up to date cc `@bjorn3` - the issue specifies `rustc_fluent_macro` but I assume this applies to all proc macro crates.
…zkan bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros Fixes rust-lang#134863 1. Checks if a crate name is in a static list before applying the flag 2. Adds a tidy check that gathers transitive deps of proc macros and ensures the list is up to date cc ``@bjorn3`` - the issue specifies `rustc_fluent_macro` but I assume this applies to all proc macro crates.
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134865 (bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros) - rust-lang#134884 (Fix typos) - rust-lang#134892 (Added codegen test for elidings bounds check when indexes are manually checked) - rust-lang#134894 (Document how to run the split Docker pipelines) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors r- |
fc73cfe
to
f073462
Compare
@bors r=onur-ozkan |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (c156614): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary -0.1%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary -2.5%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 759.369s -> 759.791s (0.06%) |
Fixes #134863
cc @bjorn3 - the issue specifies
rustc_fluent_macro
but I assume this applies to all proc macro crates.