Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix MIPS target #12878

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix MIPS target #12878

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

crabtw
Copy link
Contributor

@crabtw crabtw commented Mar 14, 2014

I ignored AtomicU64 methods on MIPS target
because libgcc doesn't implement MIPS32 64-bit atomic operations.
Otherwise it would cause link failure.

By the way, the patched LLVM doesn't have MIPS split stack anymore.
Should I file an issue about that?

I ignored AtomicU64 methods on MIPS target
because libgcc doesn't implement MIPS32 64-bit atomic operations.
Otherwise it would cause link failure.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

AtomicU64 is going away (see #12430), so we don't have to worry too much about that.

I would rather upstream the mips segmented stacks patch before merging it back into our local branch. Last I checked, it has some rebase conflicts that would need to get sorted out, but it would be cool to support it again!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2014
I ignored AtomicU64 methods on MIPS target
because libgcc doesn't implement MIPS32 64-bit atomic operations.
Otherwise it would cause link failure.

By the way, the patched LLVM doesn't have MIPS split stack anymore.
Should I file an issue about that?
@bors bors closed this Mar 14, 2014
@crabtw crabtw deleted the mips branch March 19, 2014 06:20
matthiaskrgr pushed a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
…lnicola

Find standalone proc-macro-srv on windows too

I forgot that executables end with `.exe` on Windows in:

  * rust-lang/rust-analyzer#12858
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants