Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Weekly cargo update #123580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024
Merged

Weekly cargo update #123580

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2024

Automation to keep dependencies in Cargo.lock current.

The following is the output from cargo update:

    Updating expect-test v1.4.1 -> v1.5.0
    Updating getrandom v0.2.12 -> v0.2.13
    Updating h2 v0.3.25 -> v0.3.26 (latest: v0.4.4)
    Updating pest v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_derive v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_generator v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_meta v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pulldown-cmark v0.10.0 -> v0.10.2
    Updating rustversion v1.0.14 -> v1.0.15
    Updating strsim v0.11.0 -> v0.11.1
    Updating syn v2.0.57 -> v2.0.58
    Updating ui_test v0.22.2 -> v0.22.3
note: pass `--verbose` to see 86 unchanged dependencies behind latest

cargo update
4035c24 
    Updating expect-test v1.4.1 -> v1.5.0
    Updating getrandom v0.2.12 -> v0.2.13
    Updating h2 v0.3.25 -> v0.3.26 (latest: v0.4.4)
    Updating pest v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_derive v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_generator v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pest_meta v2.7.8 -> v2.7.9
    Updating pulldown-cmark v0.10.0 -> v0.10.2
    Updating rustversion v1.0.14 -> v1.0.15
    Updating strsim v0.11.0 -> v0.11.1
    Updating syn v2.0.57 -> v2.0.58
    Updating ui_test v0.22.2 -> v0.22.3
note: pass `--verbose` to see 86 unchanged dependencies behind latest
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 7, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 7, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 7, 2024

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2024

📌 Commit 4035c24 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 13, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 14, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 4035c24 with merge a3269e9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 14, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing a3269e9 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 14, 2024
@bors bors merged commit a3269e9 into master Apr 14, 2024
1 check passed
@bors bors deleted the cargo_update branch April 14, 2024 09:01
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 14, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a3269e9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 9.3% [8.8%, 9.9%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.699s -> 676.944s (-0.11%)
Artifact size: 315.96 MiB -> 315.97 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.79.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@rustbot @Mark-Simulacrum @bors @rust-timer