Clarify Cargo.toml comments #100070
Merged
Clarify Cargo.toml comments #100070
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Existing comments were left in an incoherent state after rust-lang#99768.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Merged
|
Thanks! |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 3, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99933 (parallelize HTML checking tool) - rust-lang#99958 (Improve position named arguments lint underline and formatting names) - rust-lang#100008 (Update all pre-cloned submodules on startup) - rust-lang#100049 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#100070 (Clarify Cargo.toml comments) - rust-lang#100074 (rustc-docs: Be less specific about the representation of `+bundle`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Existing comments were left in an incoherent state after #99768.
r? @RalfJung