-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extern types #601
Extern types #601
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple nits, but pretty straightforward!
tests/test/extern_types.rs
Outdated
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you provide like a one-line comment on each of these for why this test exists (and passes as it is).
Honestly, it's probably:
extern types are always well-formed
and
extern types don't implement any builtin traits
@bors r+ |
📋 Looks like this PR is still in progress, ignoring approval. Hint: Remove [WIP] from this PR's title when it is ready for review. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 404bc7e has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Closes #595.