Files that changed from the base of the PR and between da55bec and ed7bc6c.

• config.go (1 hunks)
• schema.json (1 hunks)

schema.json (2)

Line range hint 1-124: Schema structure and validation rules look good

The schema maintains proper JSON Schema standards with:

• Clear property definitions and constraints
• Proper type validation
• Consistent structure between deprecated and new fields

---

31-31: Clarify the service_name reference in default value template

While the change to use <service_name>-<uuid> makes the namespace more meaningful, please clarify:

1. Which service_name is used (root level or resource.service_name)?
2. How is this template processed?

Consider adding documentation about the templating syntax and variable resolution.

Let's check if there's any existing documentation about this templating:

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for more context about this templating mechanism in the codebase.

---

Based on the findings from config.go, I can now generate a final response as we have clear evidence of how the templating works.

The default value template is correctly implemented but needs documentation

The implementation in config.go shows that <service_name>-<uuid> is properly handled:

• It uses Resource.ServiceNameKey for the service name
• Generates a new UUID using uuid.NewString()
• Combines them using fmt.Sprintf("%s-%s", c.Resource.ServiceNameKey, uuid.NewString())

Please add documentation in the schema or README about this templating mechanism to improve clarity for users.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation about templating syntax
rg -i "template|placeholder|<service_name>|<uuid>" README.md || echo "No documentation found about templating syntax"

Length of output: 165

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for service name and UUID related code
rg -i "service.*name.*uuid" -A 5 -B 5

# Search for any code that might be handling these placeholders
rg -i "replace.*service.*name|replace.*uuid" -A 5 -B 5

# Look for any configuration processing code
fd -e php -e go -e js "config|plugin" --exec rg -l "service.*name"

Length of output: 1518

config.go (2)

Line range hint 39-43: LGTM: Proper deprecation handling

The code appropriately handles the deprecation of service_name and service_version fields by:

1. Maintaining backward compatibility
2. Providing clear warning messages
3. Directing users to the new resource structure

---

97-97: Verify impact on existing deployments

The change to use ServiceNameKey instead of the static "RoadRunner" prefix for namespace construction is a good improvement that makes the namespace more meaningful. However, this change might affect existing monitoring/tracing setups.

Let's verify the potential impact:

Consider adding a note to the changelog about this behavioral change, as it affects the default namespace construction pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the service namespace usage and configuration to better understand the impact.

---

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

ServiceNamespaceKey change is safe to proceed

The change from static "RoadRunner" prefix to dynamic service name is safe as:

• No hardcoded dependencies on the RoadRunner-prefixed namespace format were found
• The namespace is only used internally for telemetry identification
• The UUID suffix maintains uniqueness regardless of the prefix
• The schema.json only defines the field structure without any prefix assumptions

The change improves observability by making services more identifiable in monitoring systems while maintaining backward compatibility through the same configuration key (service_namespace).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any hardcoded references to RoadRunner-prefixed namespaces
rg -l 'RoadRunner-[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}'

# Search for any configuration files that might be affected
fd -e yaml -e json -e toml | xargs rg 'service_namespace'

Length of output: 182

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the schema definition for service_namespace
cat schema.json | jq '.[] | select(.service_namespace != null)'

# Look for any tests or code that might be relying on the namespace format
rg -A 3 -B 3 'ServiceNamespaceKey'

# Check for any existing configuration examples
fd -e yaml -e json -e toml -e md | xargs rg -l 'service.*namespace'

Length of output: 1755