Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Disable scenarios not supported for OCP v4.12 also for OCP v4.13 #1374

Merged

Conversation

pmacik
Copy link
Contributor

@pmacik pmacik commented Jan 20, 2023

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík pavel.macik@gmail.com

This PR is a dependency of openshift/release#35524

Changes

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs
    included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests
    included if any functionality added or changed. For bugfixes please include tests that can catch regressions
  • All acceptance test scenarios included in the PR which verifies a bugfix or a requested feature reported by a non-member are tagged with @external-feedback tag.
  • Follows the commit message standard

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>
@pmacik pmacik added the release/v1.3.x Used to mark PRs to be cherry-picked in release-v1.3.x branch label Jan 20, 2023
@pmacik pmacik changed the title Disable scenarios not supported for OCP 4.12 also for OCP v4.13 Disable scenarios not supported for OCP v4.12 also for OCP v4.13 Jan 20, 2023
@pmacik
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmacik commented Jan 20, 2023

@filariow PTAL

@filariow
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@pmacik
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmacik commented Jan 21, 2023

/retest

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1374 (bc74ae8) into master (f743550) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1374   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.21%   58.21%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        3011     3011           
=======================================
  Hits         1753     1753           
  Misses       1090     1090           
  Partials      168      168           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f743550...bc74ae8. Read the comment docs.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3993218 into redhat-developer:master Jan 22, 2023
service-binding-operator-bot pushed a commit to service-binding-operator-bot/service-binding-operator that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2023
Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>
openshift-merge-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2023
Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pavel Macík <pavel.macik@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved lgtm release/v1.3.x Used to mark PRs to be cherry-picked in release-v1.3.x branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants