Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyze SwiftLint on CI #2387

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 4, 2018
Merged

Analyze SwiftLint on CI #2387

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 4, 2018

Conversation

jpsim
Copy link
Collaborator

@jpsim jpsim commented Sep 3, 2018

No description provided.

@jpsim jpsim merged commit 6cea034 into master Sep 4, 2018
@jpsim jpsim deleted the analyze-swiftlint branch September 4, 2018 15:55
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2387 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2387      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.62%   90.64%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         314      314              
  Lines       15747    15747              
==========================================
+ Hits        14271    14274       +3     
+ Misses       1476     1473       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...SwiftLintFramework/Extensions/File+SwiftLint.swift 97.23% <0%> (+0.46%) ⬆️
...tFramework/Rules/Lint/ValidIBInspectableRule.swift 100% <0%> (+1.36%) ⬆️
...ftLintFramework/Rules/Lint/PrivateOutletRule.swift 100% <0%> (+3.33%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8d73436...4574042. Read the comment docs.

sjavora pushed a commit to sjavora/SwiftLint that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2019
* Enable analyzer_rules in .swiftlint.yml

* Add analyze and analyze_autocorrect commands to Makefile

* Run `swiftlint analyze` on CI

* Run make bootstrap before make analyze
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants