Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate MergeNQubitGates optimizer #5653

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tanujkhattar
Copy link
Collaborator

Part of #5028

@tanujkhattar tanujkhattar requested review from a team, vtomole and cduck as code owners June 30, 2022 00:22
@tanujkhattar tanujkhattar requested a review from pavoljuhas June 30, 2022 00:22
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@CirqBot CirqBot added the size: S 10< lines changed <50 label Jun 30, 2022
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ def _interaction(
)


@cirq._compat.deprecated_class(deadline='v0.16', fix="Use cirq.merge_k_qubit_unitaries")
class MergeNQubitGates(cirq.PointOptimizer):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This class does more than cirq.merge_k_qubit_unitaries. It calls off to cirq.drop_negligible_operations and cirq.drop_empty_moments as well. Will existing tests for this optimizer pass if only cirq.merge_k_qubit_unitaries is called?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you point me to where MergeNQubitGates optimizer calls off to cirq.drop_negligible_operations and cirq.drop_empty_moments ?

Also, the call sites calling MergeNQubitGates have been updated to call cirq.merge_k_qubit_unitaries and no tests fail right now. But to answer your specific question, cirq.merge_k_qubit_unitaries does not call cirq.drop_negligible_operations and cirq.drop_empty_moments by default.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vtomole vtomole Jul 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, i mistook this for simplify_expectation_value_circuit that's after this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vtomole vtomole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tanujkhattar tanujkhattar added the automerge Tells CirqBot to sync and merge this PR. (If it's running.) label Jul 7, 2022
@CirqBot CirqBot added the front_of_queue_automerge CirqBot uses this label to indicate (and remember) what's being merged next. label Jul 7, 2022
@CirqBot CirqBot merged commit b592ae7 into master Jul 7, 2022
@CirqBot CirqBot removed the automerge Tells CirqBot to sync and merge this PR. (If it's running.) label Jul 7, 2022
@CirqBot CirqBot deleted the deprecate_merge_n_qubit_gates branch July 7, 2022 01:32
@CirqBot CirqBot removed the front_of_queue_automerge CirqBot uses this label to indicate (and remember) what's being merged next. label Jul 7, 2022
rht pushed a commit to rht/Cirq that referenced this pull request May 1, 2023
harry-phasecraft pushed a commit to PhaseCraft/Cirq that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: S 10< lines changed <50
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants