I think I made a mistake in the commit message, should I fix it?
Also, I have a commit history that I don't need, can it be merged together?

I think I made a mistake in the commit message, should I fix it?
Also, I have a commit history that I don't need, can it be merged together?

Both can be changed when/if we merge, so don't worry too much about it :)

You need to rebase though, as you have conflicts in test_dis

I think I've probably solved it.

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

I'm not sure about this approach. If we have more then one arg, and they are on different lines, it will report the last line, but that's probably not what we want.

>>> 1 \
 .bit_length(*["aaa"], \
             2,
             3)

I would go for the 3.8, 3.9 behaviour from #89354 (comment)

which means to fix the location for CALL.

After thinking about it for a while, it certainly seems correct that the error location is aligned on the first line.
I have made a commit to correct this.

By the way, should I delete the old NEWS.d and create a new one...?

I believe that some of the tests that this code is failing should change the expected result, what do you think?
a.b() is interpreted as CALL(ATTR(a, "b"), []). It seems odd that the execution location of the CALL does not include the execution locations of all child nodes.

I believe that some of the tests that this code is failing should change the expected result, what do you think? a.b() is interpreted as CALL(ATTR(a, "b"), []). It seems odd that the execution location of the CALL does not include the execution locations of all child nodes.

If the range is too wide then coverage can show code that never executed as if it did execute. As in:

>>> f( 
...     (a + b) 
...     if x
...     else
...    (c + d)
... )

Sorry for the delay in replying.
I thought about it, but was not sure of the impact of this PR in terms of coverage, etc.
My understanding is that it would behave at least the same as a method call involving starg. If the behavior of this method call is undesirable, I think the behavior of the method call containing stararg needs to be changed.