-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release summary for release v2024.01.0 #8617
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Thanks @kmuehlbauer ! |
Note that some new compression filters needs plugins to be installed which may not be available in all netCDF distributions. | ||
By `Markel García-Díez <https://github.com/markelg>`_. (:issue:`6929`, :pull:`7551`) | ||
- Add :py:meth:`DataArray.cumulative` & :py:meth:`Dataset.cumulative` to compute | ||
cumulative aggregations, such as ``sum``, along a dimension — for example | ||
``da.cumulative('time').sum()``. This is similar to pandas' ``.expanding``, | ||
and mostly equivalent to ``.cumsum`` methods, or to | ||
:py:meth:`DataArray.rolling` with a window length equal to the dimension size. | ||
By `Maximilian Roos <https://github.com/max-sixty>`_. (:pull:`8512`) | ||
- Decode/Encode netCDF4 enums and store the enum definition in dataarrays' dtype metadata. | ||
If multiple variables share the same enum in netCDF4, each dataarray will have its own | ||
enum definition in their respective dtype metadata. | ||
By `Abel Aoun <https://github.com/bzah>`_. (:issue:`8144`, :pull:`8147`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm very late to the party, but note that the issue / pr links are after the user links, unlike our previous convention. @TomNicholas, should we fix that before the release?
Also, should we merge #8605 first? The fix for CI, as discussed today in the meeting, was to remove pint
from the environment for now.
If you'd say yes to both, I can push the fix in #8605
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note that the issue / pr links are after the user links, unlike our previous convention
Oh huh - looks like people are inconsistent with that in whats-new. I can fix that.
Also, should we merge #8605 first?
If that's ready to merge now then sure!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, it is. The tests just passed!
Someone give this a thumbs up if it looks good