-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Prometheus Remote Write 2.0 #35
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: alexgreenbank <alex.greenbank@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: alexgreenbank <alex.greenbank@grafana.com>
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
See proposal prometheus/proposals#35 which explain rationales. Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
- string interning - metadata - samples vs histogram samples - exemplars Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
Updated proposal: new structure, all decisions outlined.
2376ae2
to
077e1dc
Compare
This proposal is ready for wider review! Some sections are linked by the spec itself to track decision rationales. |
Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
077e1dc
to
90e1801
Compare
Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
See proposal prometheus/proposals#35 which explain rationales. Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
Update: The spec was released in the experimental state https://prometheus.io/docs/specs/remote_write_spec_2_0/ Official comms & blog post will come, but it's rdy for early adoption. Prometheus support & compliance test will be released soon 🤗 We will merge this proposal once the spec will become stable. Feel free to comment/give suggestions! |
Proposal for the Remote Write 2.0 spec.