Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add error message if old alert rule tokens are read #1561

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2016
Merged

Conversation

fabxc
Copy link
Contributor

@fabxc fabxc commented Apr 16, 2016

@@ -395,6 +405,12 @@ func (l *lexer) errorf(format string, args ...interface{}) stateFn {
func (l *lexer) nextItem() item {
item := <-l.items
l.lastPos = item.pos

// TODO(fabxc): remove for version 1.0.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could even be 0.19.0, or will that be the last 0. release \o/?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see us doing any large breaking changes that justify another 0.x and would like to go straight for 1.0 afterwards.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#1503 will be a large breaking change that we should complete with 1.0.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but that's essentially the last thing and doable within the scope of one minor (which will be the transition to 1.0). No reason for 0.19.

@grobie
Copy link
Member

grobie commented Apr 16, 2016

Awesome! 👍

@fabxc fabxc merged commit 64ed5d0 into master Apr 16, 2016
@fabxc fabxc deleted the fabxc/alerterr branch April 16, 2016 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants